Tag Archives: UK

UK Asylum Guidelines Suggest Accepting Claims From Muslim Brotherhood Members

It is no wonder that the UK is seen throughout the world as a soft touch and safe haven for  no good Islamists and terrorists to claim asylum when the British government publishes guidelines for asylum claims such as the one  for members of the Muslim Brotherhood(Aug 2016). Even post Brexit the lunacy continues.

The Home Office guide recommends accepting asylum claims from high ranking members of  Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood. The guide also states:  “Additionally, high profile supporters or those perceived to support the MB, such as journalists, may also be similarly at risk of persecution. In such cases, a grant of asylum will be appropriate.” 

The Muslim Brotherhood were behind the Egypts ‘Arab Spring’ in 2011 which saw Islamists seize  power with Muslim Brotherhood frontman  Mohammed Morsi  elected president.  The Islamist group remained in power until 2013 when the military ousted them. MB   has since  been labelled a terrorist organisation by the governments of Bahrain,* Egypt,* Russia,* Saudi Arabia,* Syria,* and the United Arab Emirates.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a transnational Sunni Islamist movement that seeks to implement sharia (Islamic law) under a global caliphate. The group operates through both violent and political means. Founded in Egypt in 1928, the Brotherhood is the country’s oldest Islamist organisation and has branches throughout the world. While these branches operate under a variety of names and use a variety of social, political and/or violent methods, they share a commitment to the overarching goal of establishing rule according to sharia. The most notable and lethal Brotherhood offshoot is Hamas, the Palestinian terror group operating out of the Gaza Strip.  .

The Brotherhood advocates a deceptive strategy in democracies: appear moderate and use existing institutions to gain power by means of stealth jihad. It believes it can conquer Europe and other Western nations peacefully by this method

“After having been expelled twice, Islam will be victorious and reconquer Europe….I am certain that this time, victory will be won not by the sword but by preaching and [Islamic] ideology.” — Muslim Brotherhood Spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi, “Fatwa,” 2003

The Brotherhood uses democracy, but once in power it will replace democracy with fundamentalist shariah law because it is the “true democracy.”

“The final, absolute message from heaven contains all the values which the secular world claims to have invented….Islam and its values antedated the West by founding true democracy.”
—Former Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide Muhammed Mahdi Akef, Nov. 2007

UK: Muslim Brotherhood members can claim asylum from Egypt

British government guidance comes less than a year after UK decided not to ban the UK branch of the group

Egyptian members of the Muslim Brotherhood may be able to seek asylum in the UK, according to new guidance from British immigration authorities.

But the move could anger London’s allies in the Middle East – including Egypt and Saudi Arabia – which have declared the Brotherhood a “terrorist” organisation.

‘Each case will need to be considered on its facts’

The Home Office guidance, entitled “Country Information and Guidance Egypt: Muslim Brotherhood”, states that high profile or politically active members, especially those attending protests “may be able to show that they are at risk of persecution, including of being held in detention, where they may be at risk of ill-treatment, trial also without due process and disproportionate punishment.”

It continues: “Additionally, high profile supporters or those perceived to support the MB, such as journalists, may also be similarly at risk of persecution. In such cases, a grant of asylum will be appropriate.”

The documents states however that “low-level, nonpolitical or inactive members and supporters are not generally being targeted” and that they may not be able to show a real risk of persecution” before concluding: “Each case will need to be considered on its facts.”

It also adds that the group “are reported to have released a statement in January 2015 calling on followers to embrace ‘jihad’ and ‘martyrdom’ to fight the current regime” in Egypt.

“Depending on the nature of the person’s involvement, decision makers must consider whether one of the exclusion clauses is applicable.”

UK sends mixed messages about group

During the past two years the UK government has sent mixed messages about the Brotherhood.

In December 2015, then prime minister David Cameron said in a written statement that while the country would not ban the group, it had a “highly ambiguous relationship with violent extremism” and was “deliberately opaque”.

He added that the Uk would “refuse visas to members and associates of the Muslim Brotherhood who are on record as having made extremist comments.”

Cameron’s comments came at the same time as the publication of an of an 11-page summary of a review, which has been repeatedly delayed and has yet to be released in full.

The Jenkins review did not find direct links between the UK Brotherhood and radical Islam, but said that membership could be considered a “possible indicator of extremism” and that the group had been a “rite of passage” to violence for some members.

As a result, it said, the group would be closely monitored to ensure it was not breaking UK anti-terrorism laws.

UK allies in Middle East: Putting pressure on London?

The Jenkins report was commissioned in 2013 as Britain came under pressure from the UAE, Egypt and Saudi Arabia to ban the Brotherhood, which had been proscribed as terrorist in all three countries following the removal of Brotherhood member Mohamed Morsi from the Egyptian presidency.

Critics of the report have accused Britain of conducting the investigation under pressure from Gulf allies.

That concern was heightened last November when reports emerged of documents revealing that the UAE had threatened to cut lucrative arms deals with the UK, stop inward investment and cut intelligence cooperation if Cameron did not act against the group.

British ministers delayed its publication on two occasions, leading to allegations that the results would upset British allies in the Middle East. The final report remains unpublished.

In June foreign policy experts told the UK parliament’s foreign affairs committee that the report overemphasised the group’s connection to violence and was at times inaccurate.

Courtney Freer, a research officer at the London School of Economic’s Kuwait Programme, said the Jenkin’s review “overplayed the connection between the Brotherhood and violence and violent groups”.

The Brotherhood, which was founded in Egypt in 1928 but now has branches in many states, many of which have little connection between one another, has repeatedly denied that it has engaged in or promoted acts of violence.


Attempted Abduction Of Serviceman Outside RAF Base By 2 Arabs Police Say Possibly Terrorism

Lets be honest it was only a matter of time before the jihad against the civilised infidels landed on our own doorsteps. The French had the Paris massacre and this weeks truck attack in Nice killing 85 innocents.  In the USA 49 killed in a Florida gay nightclub by an Islamist savage. Earlier this week in Germany they had a terror attack on a train by a fundamentalist Afghan knife-man. Now it seems its the UK’s turn for the brain-dead Islamofascists to bring their backwards savagery in the name of Allah to.

RAF Marham: Serviceman threatened with knife treated as abduction

Soldier on patrol at RAF MarhamImage copyrightPA
Image captionSoldiers are patrolling the exterior of RAF Marham following the abduction attempt

A serviceman who was threatened with a knife near an RAF base was the victim of an attempted abduction, police said.

Officers said he was approached by two men as he was out jogging near RAF Marham in Norfolk on Wednesday.

He was threatened with a knife and attempts were made to grab him but the victim, who was not in uniform, fought them off and escaped unharmed.

Norfolk Police said it was “unable to discount terrorism” as a motive.

Follow live updates on this story

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) confirmed RAF Marham is home to some of the Tornado bombers that have recently taken part in air strikes against so called Islamic State.

Det Supt Paul Durham said the serviceman was jogging along a fairly isolated route used regularly by base personnel when he was grabbed by a man from a parked, dark coloured people carrier.

He was wearing headphones and listening to music at the time so did not hear what the first attacker said to him, police said.

He managed to wrestle him to the ground before a second man, armed with the knife, tried to attack him.

The men then fled in the car.

The knife was described as a “military type” with a three inch handle and blade measuring about 2.5 – 3 inches long.

Media captionNorfolk Police are hunting two suspects over the attempted kidnap, Asst Ch Cons Nick Dean says

Det Supt Durham said the force were examining CCTV footage outside the base and that tracing the vehicle was “hugely important to the investigation”.

“We want to recover that vehicle and its occupants”, he said.

Police have issued descriptions of the two suspects involved.

One is described as between 20 and 30 years old, approximately 6ft (1.81m) tall, of athletic but stocky build, with dark hair, long on top, and a well-groomed beard. He was of Middle Eastern appearance with dark skin and wore dark casual clothing.

The other is said to be around the same age but younger than the first suspect and of a slimmer build, 5ft 10ins (1.78m) tall, and clean shaven with short dark hair. He was also of Middle Eastern appearance and wore a white t-shirt and dark shorts.

Det Supt Durham said they were keen to hear from anyone who may have seen the people carrier in the King’s Lynn area “but particularly towards Marham between midday and 6pm yesterday”.

He added: “The motivation for the attack remains unclear and whilst we are currently unable to discount terrorism, there are a number of other possible hypotheses.”

Media captionHeightened security at RAF Marham following the “attempted kidnap” of serviceman

A dedicated hotline for anyone who has information about the abduction has also been set up.

Detectives are urging members of the public to call 0800 056 0154 or 0207 158 0011 particularly if they saw a dark coloured people carrier in the King’s Lynn area yesterday afternoon.

Assistant Chief Constable Nick Dean said vigilance at RAF Marham and the wider community would be enhanced.

He added: “But in terms of the threat to national security, and particularly the military, there has been no change in terms of the security threat.”

The MoD said it was aware of the police operation but would not comment further.

The Burnthouse Drove and Ladywood Road area remains closed as police carry out patrols, house-to-house inquiries and more detailed searches.

Families arriving at base
Image captionPeople attended the base’s families day which went ahead despite the attempted abduction

The base is home to almost 10,000 people, including members of the RAF, Navy and Army, as well as the civil service and other staff.

A spokeswoman said an event for base friends and families went ahead as planned.

Iceland Stores Selling Inhumanely Slaughtered Halal Meat To The Public

Post from Boycott Halal UK

Letter to ICELAND from UK Member [JD]
How can Iceland condone selling halal meat to the general public?
This is against the law. It is also immoral. The exemption from the laws covering slaughter of animals in the UK for ritually slaughtered meat is only for meat to be consumed by muslims and jews. It’s no good saying that the animals are stunned first because this would make the meat haram (nothalal).
The meat you sell has been subjected to so called “lo-stun” where a lower voltage is used to paralyse the animal without rendering it unconscious so the poor animals final seconds are spent in sheer terror as it has it’s throat slit whilst listening to a muslim prayer.
I will never set foot in an Iceland store again. Shame on you.
I hope your customers desert you in droves.

Two More Homegrown Terrorists Given Life For Plotting London Bomb Attack

Two more homegrown terrorists lifed off for plotting  an attack against innocent people on British soil. How much longer can the government and Muslim apologists keep up the charade that these jihadists are not representative of British Muslims when the amount getting caught suggests otherwise 


LONDON—A British couple who plotted Islamic State-inspired suicide bomb attacks against targets including a popular London shopping mall and the city’s subway system were both handed life sentences on Wednesday.

Mohammed Rehman, 25, will spend at least 27 years behind bars, while his wife, Sana Ahmed Khan, 24, will serve a minimum of 25 years in prison, judge Jeremy Baker ruled in a short hearing at the Old Bailey.

Mr. Rehman, from Reading, west of London, and Ms. Ahmed Khan, from the nearby town of Wokingham, were Tuesday convicted of preparing terrorist acts. Mr. Rehman was also convicted of an additional charge of possessing an article for terrorist purposes.

The couple assiduously set about constructing explosives capable of causing mass casualties and were on the brink of executing their plans when specialist counterterrorism police arrested them in late May, police and prosecutors said.

Prosecutors said Mr. Rehman and Ms. Ahmed Khan intended to time their attacks to coincide with the 10th anniversary of the July 7, 2005, suicide bombings on the London transportation system that killed 52 people and injured hundreds more.

“The pair had been very close to carrying out an attack, all they required was to purchase the chemicals to make a detonator,” said Susan Hemming, head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s counterterrorism division after the guilty verdicts were delivered on Tuesday.

The husband and wife, who married in secret in 2013 and lived separately, had been under surveillance after police noticed a series of social-media posts by Mr. Rehman that made clear his intention to carry out violence in the name of radical Islam. Using theTwitter alias “Silent Bomber” in an account featuring images of Islamic State executions, Mr. Rehman called on his Twitter followers to vote on possible targets in the capital.

A Twitter account used by Mohammed Rehman, who used the pseudonym ‘Silent Bomber.’ ENLARGE
A Twitter account used by Mohammed Rehman, who used the pseudonym ‘Silent Bomber.’ PHOTO: THAMES VALLEY POLICE

In one tweet, Mr. Rehman wrote: “Westfield shopping centre or London underground? Any advice would be appreciated greatly.”

Mr. Rehman stockpiled fertilizer and carried out minor test blasts in his garden, the court heard. Police who raided Mr. Rehman’s Reading home found more than 10 kilograms of highly explosive urea nitrate, which prosecutors said would have caused “multiple fatalities” if detonated in the tight confines of a subway train or station. They had also considered bombing the Westfield Shopping Centre, prosecutors said.

“There is little doubt that, had Rehman and Ahmed Khan not been stopped when they were, they would have attempted to carry out an act of terrorism in London,” said Ms. Hemming said.

During the six-week trial, jurors heard how Ms. Ahmed Khan helped her husband by taking out loans and depositing nearly $21,000 into his bank account for the purchase of explosive chemicals. Prosecutors said Ms. Ahmed Khan was a “supporter of violent and extreme Islamic ideology” who played a key role motivating her husband.

The pair shared Islamic State video clips, which police and prosecutors said was proof of their radicalization and malign intent.

The two defendants denied the charges. In an interview with police presented in court as evidence, Mr. Rehman admitted manufacturing explosives but said it wasn’t with the intention of hurting anyone. His wife, Ms. Ahmed Khan, refused to answer questions from police and denied any knowledge of his social media posts.

Speaking after the sentencing on Wednesday, the police officer who led the unit that tracked Mr. Rehman and his wife welcomed the court’s decision.

“It was clear that Rehman and Khan shared a radical and violent extremist ideology,” saidLaura Nicholson, the head of the South East Counter Terrorism Unit. “They actively accessed extremist material on the Internet and used social media to develop and share their views as they prepared acts of terrorism. The sentences at court here today reflect this and the threat they posed with their actions,” Ms. Nicholson said.


Here We Go Again, Muslims Now Want EID As A Bank Holiday

If ever proof was needed of Muslims demanding their own way and the threat to our futures from Islam then this is it. Demanding that EID should become a Bank Holiday. Stealth jihad is happening all around us, Islamization is a serious reality that we should all be aware of. Attempting to get EID made a Bank Holiday and Islam part of law is  one step closer to sharia.

Britain could get Muslim and Hindu Bank Holidays

Britain could get Muslim and Hindu Bank Holidays
Eid festival in Trafalgar Square (Picture: Flickr/ Nathan Meijer)

Britain could soon get its first Muslim and Hindu Bank Holiday days after a petition to Downing Street reached 119,000 signatures.

Any petition to the Government that hits more than 100,000 signatures must be debated in Parliament under rules established in 2011.

If a new Bank Holiday weekend is created it would be the first non-Christian religious holiday in the UK.

Diwali is celebrated by Hindus in the Autumn as the ‘Festival of Lights’.

Eid is held at the end of Ramadan when Muslims break their fast.

(Picture: epetitions.co.uk)
(Picture: epetitions.direct.gov.uk)

The petition, on epetitions.direct.gov.uk, was created by Jon Timmis calls for the Muslim festval Eid and Hindu festival of Diwali to become public holiday days.

Mr Timmis says doin gthis would go some way ‘to help recognise the importance of these faiths to many within the community’.

The petition is due to close on July 12th but is understood to have already been passed to the Backbench Business Committee, which considers the suitability of petitions for debate.

Vinod Popat, chairman of The ­British Hindu Voice, said he didn’t think it was a good idea- especially as Diwali is not given a set date and depends on a lunar calendar,.

‘I don’t think it is a very good idea. How many festivals are there for other religions. Should they all be marked with a ­public holiday?,’ he told the Sunday Express.
Britain currently has eight bank holidays each year – the second lowest in the world. Mexico has the lowest.

Death Threats Issued To New UK Anti-Sharia Campaign Group

A new campaign group against sharia law being implemented in Britain and to highlight the threat of Islamism in our society has received death threats on its launch. Followers of ‘the religion of peace’ once again show how peaceful Islam really is with the usual threats of violence and death to anybody who speaks out against them. If Islam was a person it would be a spoilt child who has a tantrum everytime they cant have their own way and bullies smaller children in the school playground.


Death threats issued as Sharia Watch launches in London

24 April 2014, 13:56  

A new group has been launched at the House of Lords to campaign for greater recognition of the threat posed by Islamic Sharia law. Sharia Watch UK says it wants to highlight the impact of Islamism in Britain and campaign against the prevalence of Sharia tribunals, particularly where it relates to women’s rights. VoR’s Tim Ecott spoke to Anne Marie Waters, spokesperson for Sharia Watch, and to Aina Khan, a solicitor in London who specialises in applying Sharia law within the English legal system.

“Our aim is quite simply to tell the truth,” says Waters. “There is a large lack of knowledge of what Sharia Law actually stands for, what it does to women, how it treats women. And our aim is simply to tell the public – warts and all – what Sharia is: its views of women, its views of free speech, its threat to democracy, how it is operating in Britain, the organisations behind it and what their agendas are, and, indeed, the public support that such organisations receive from public figures.

Where do you see the threat coming from?

“It’s acceptance of it by the mainstream, that is a huge issue. If you look at what Sharia says about women, for example, it essentially advocates the slavery of women. If you strip it away and bear it down, that’s what it is, it’s the slavery of women, it’s the ownership of women. It degrades and humiliates women and yet it is accepted by the mainstream and supported by mainstream figures.”

You say it’s accepted; Britain still applies the rule of British Law, where do you see Sharia law coming in or being accepted in a way that makes you fearful?

“We have a network of Sharia councils and tribunals which are dealing increasingly with matters of family law, such as divorce, child custody, but also with domestic violence, which is a criminal matter. No private tribunal or council has any right, any legal right, to adjudicate on criminal matters and yet they are doing it without a murmur of protest from the Establishment.

“We’re consistently told that the English law is there for everyone who needs it. This is a non-answer, a non-response. It’s cowardly.

“”What they’re essentially saying is that women who are brutalised often don’t speak English, often are newcomers to this country. The government’s response is that those women should somehow find the confidence and courage to stand up and demand rights they don’t even know they have.”

You believe there are a number of women in Britain – Muslim women -who you think are facing Sharia justice in some kind of community set-up?

“We know it’s happening. The Islamic Sharia Council’s quite open about this, as is the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal. So we know it happens.

“In research for Baroness Cox’s [Arbitration and Mediation Services (Equality)] Bill, for example – the bill she is introducing into the {House of] Lords to bring these places into line with human rights laws, many women who have been through them were interviewed. It was confirmed to us, for example, that Muslim women need a witness for every testimony she gives, because a woman’s word is worth half of a man’s. This is even confirmed by, for example, Aina Khan, who is a pro-Sharia advocate and a lawyer, so we don’t suspect it’s going on, we know it’s going on.”

Presumably you oppose the Law Society’s recent decision to issue guidance to British lawyers who are asked to draw up Wills according to Sharia Law?

“Absolutely! It’s the same message, it’s the sanitising of Sharia. It creates in the public mind an impression that there’s nothing wrong with Sharia, that it’s not misogynistic. It sanitises Sharia. It makes people think, ‘well if the Law Society is issuing guidance on it, it can’t be that bad’.”

You feel the authorities, the Establishment are turning a blind eye – why would they do that?

“There are many reasons…. fear is chief among them. I think they’re afraid of being accused of Islamophobia, for example. Individuals are afraid of violence. I get death threats.”

You personally have had death threats?

“Yes. I get threats into my e-mail inbox on a regular basis. For example, I was due to give a speech in a university in East London. A man came in with a camera, filmed everyone there and said he knew who we were and he would track us down if we said anything negative about the Prophet. The government is afraid of upsetting the Islamist establishment.”

Do you have any notable figures or MPs who are behind Sharia Watch?

“I am not a one-woman band. I do not have any specific MPs, but we are very new, we are only launching today and we hope to gain support as we go along.

Are you prepared for an outcry among those Muslims and non-Muslims who say Britain is a multi-faith, multi-ethnic society, the setting-up of Sharia Watch is going to be labelled at best racist?

“I’m used to it. This has got nothing to do with race. Islam is not a race. Sharia is not a race. This is a civil rights issue, a human rights issue, a democracy issue, a freedom-of-speech issue. We’re not against anyone, we are defending gender equality, defending freedom of speech. If that brings us into conflict with Sharia, then so be it.”

VoR’s Tim Ecott also spoke to Aina Khan, head of the Islamic department at Duncan Lewis, solicitors.

Download podcast

What do you make of the charges made by Sharia Watch that Muslim women in this country are facing discrimination because in their words, Sharia Law values women less than men?

“I am not able to agree with that at all because the Sharia that I practise under English law, which I provide solutions under for my clients, works extremely well in favour of women, particularly those who can’t be helped by English law.

“For example, a woman who believes she is married under English law, but only had a Muslim ceremony in the UK – that marriage is not recognised under English law unless it is registered. If she didn’t know that that wasn’t a valid marriage she stands to lose all her matrimonial rights to property and a share of the family assets. English law will do nothing because she will be classed as a girlfriend or co-habitee, and co-habitees don’t have any rights under English law.

“Sharia law actually gives that woman and others like her great security by giving her the Islamic financial settlement that is in every Muslim marriage. So I take those cases to court under English contract law. If a woman has been promised a lump sum by her husband and then he divorces her, it’s only Islamic law that will help her get back to the position she was in before the marriage.”

That seems to imply that you see a way of allowing Sharia to operate in parallel with the official English legal system.

“I would never say that it’s in parallel – it’s always under the English legal system. Over a century ago, the Jewish communities started the beth din (Rabbinical court of Judaism) in this country and indeed around the world, and they’ve been happily providing those solutions for the Jewish community under English law. What on earth is wrong with other communities doing the same?”

If any community’s laws coincide with English law in this country, all well and good. But what about the assertion that under Sharia law, women’s rights as not as forceful or as equal as they would be under English law?

“In certain situations that can happen because Sharia law was brought into being 1,400 years ago, and we had laws in England even 100 years ago that were discriminatory. Women couldn’t own property – Islamic law gave women the right to own property 1,400 years ago.

“My view is Sharia is not set in stone, it should move with the times and also the country it finds itself in. As long as it’s not producing inequalities in society, Sharia law can accommodate all levels of debate.”

And you don’t believe it puts women in an inferior position?

“It doesn’t if we apply it correctly under English law. It will put women in an inferior position if you apply it in a country where there is no progression since 1,400 years ago – that’s where we have issues.”

Next week there are to be protests against the Law Society because the Law Society has issued guidance to British solicitors about how to advise clients who come with a Sharia dispute or contention.

“This was a non-story that was blown out of proportion. The law has not changed in any way. There are certain mischievous elements that want to create discord in our society, and it’s the same groups again and again who use an emotive word – Sharia.

“The Law Society did a simple thing – they told solicitors what the guidance would be if they wanted to make a Will according to Islamic law. It doesn’t change the law in any way regarding Wills, you’re still free to give all your money to the local dogs’ home. The only thing Islamic law would do is not allow that – it says you can only give one third away, the rest has to go to your family in certain set shares.”

For many, Sharia represents a different system that in some parts of the world allows for the amputation of hands, the stoning of unfaithful women – you can see why that worries people.

“Absolutely, and it’s the Muslim community’s duty to explain how one system can apply different ways of law to different situations. Criminal law we won’t accept in the UK, family law people want to accept in the UK.

“It’s not about an alien system, which many people see. There are countless thousands of Muslim converts in the UK alone who are born in Britain – they may be African-Caribbean, Irish, Scottish… What are you going to do about those who are voluntarily choosing Islam as a faith? You can’t just get emotive, you have to increase your knowledge and understand what attracts them to that faith, and then we can have a dialogue.”

Do you think it’s a malicious movement where people are projecting a fear of all things Islamic, and are using Sharia as an example of something they fear which may eventually be so popular it will demand official recognition, such as Sharia law equals English law?

“I can understand where the fear comes from. I would probably find it frightening if I didn’t understand it. It also plays into the hands of extremism, and people like the English Defence League, and other right-wing groups. It’s important to stay calm because we don’t want to see victimisation of any one community.”


Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/uk/news/2014_04_24/Death-threats-issued-as-Sharia-Watch-launches-in-London-6217/

More KFC Halal Muslim Appeasing By Withdrawing Big Daddy Burger Due To Bacon Slice At Rochdale Branch

More Muslim appeasement by the dhimmis at KFC. A couple of weeks back i posted a list of KFC branches that were now serving halal food to the public. Brought in on the quiet without consulting the general public.

Boycott KFC. Halal food funds Islamic terrorist groups

Now the Muslim loving has gone a step further at KFC Rochdale on Kingsway Retail Park. Where they have withdrawn the Big Daddy Burger from sale because it contains a slice of bacon and is therefore non halal. KFC seem to forget or don’t give a damm that the majority of Brits are non Muslim. Rochdale is in Greater Manchester not Greater Mecca.

They would rather discriminate against the majority than upset the minority Muslims. I would rather starve to death than give KFC a single penny

If you wish to express your disgust like i will be doing to the Muslim appeasers at KFC here is their contact details:

KFC Customer Services
PO Box 57984
London W4 9AX

Customer Careline
0845 753 2532
10am – 5pm Mon – Fri 

By Online Form

Big Daddy Burger not sold at ‘halal’ KFC in Rochdale

Reporter: Amy Westlake
Date online: 27 March 2014

KFC, which is located on Kingsway Retail Park, will not sell the Big Daddy Burger, which contains a whole chicken breast fillet, a hash brown, bacon and a slice of cheese all in a toasted sesame bun, as the store is being run as a ‘halal’ store.

Some customers have complained to the store about the fact that they are not selling the companies most popular burger but despite these complaints KFC state that there has been a positive reaction to the store being a halal store.

A spokesperson for KFC said: “We have been running a halal trial for several years in areas where there has been demand from our customers, and our Kingsway Retail Park restaurant has been a halal store since 2009.

“Our strict animal welfare standards have not changed, and the Big Daddy burger is the only item we’ve removed from our menu at trial stores.

“Feedback has been very positive, however we understand that some customers want a choice, and anybody wanting a non-halal option can visit our restaurant in Bury.”

Illegal Immigrant Who Fathered 5 Children While In The UK Is Jailed For Using Fake Passport

No doubt this illegal immigrant who entered the UK on a false passport and fathered 5 children in the 12 years since arriving, will now use those children as a tool to avoid deportation after his release from prison claiming a right to a family life.

I have an even better idea….. Deport him immediately on release from prison. If he is that desperate for a family life, the UK Border Agency should pay for his children and their mother to join him back in Pakistan. It will be far more cost effective than going through the courts and it will all be money saved by the DWP from their years of  benefit claims should they remain here.

Illegal immigrant who fathered five children while in the UK is jailed for 21 months

An illegal immigrant who fathered five children after arriving in the UK on a fake British passport has been sent to jail.

Mohammed Zulfiqar, 55, of Amberley Street, Bradford Moor, Bradford, was caught after he applied for a licence to get work as a doorman in the security industry and used the passport to support his application.

Further inquiries revealed the person named in the passport had reported his stolen, while a national insurance number quoted by Zulfiqar belonged to a dead man.

Martin Robertshaw, prosecuting, said Zulfiqar’s home in Bradford was searched on August 28 last year and a Pakistani passport was found with counterfeit entries on it including one that said there was no limit to the period he could stay in Britain.

In fact Zulfiqar accepted entering the country illegally in 2002 having paid an agent in Pakistan around £15,000.

Lisa Julian representing him said Zulfiqar now had five children under the age of six and a wife with health difficulties and was trying to fight deportation proceedings.

Zulfiqar was found guilty by a jury at Bradford Crown Courtof using the fake British passport to gain employment and possessing the Pakistan passport with counterfeit endorsements.

Jailing him at Leeds Crown Court yesterday for a total of 21 months, Recorder Keith Miller said the fake British passport was a sophisticated forgery and it was only an expert who was examining it in minute detail who would spot some spelling mistakes in the small print.

But it had been spotted and when immigration officials went to his home they found the other passport with counterfeit stamps on it, including one purporting to be a visit to Islamabad.

“I believe you know very much more than you are prepared to divulge about the circumstances in which you acquired the British passport and the stamps on the Pakistani passport. What is clear is that you are in this country illegally.

“There is no record of your having entered the UK and during your evidence you stated you paid £15,000 to an agent in order to come here,” said Recorder Miller.

He said in the worst cases such false documents could be used to engage in acts of terrorism, although that was not the case here.

“In this and similar cases to yours the misuse of false passports undermines the legitimate purpose of the authorities in seeking to regulate immigration and the influx of people who wish to use our health, education and housing services.”

Recorder Miller told Zulfiqar it would be up to the Home Office what happened over his deportation but it was open to his family to go to Pakistan themselves.


Boycott KFC: Halal Only Chicken At These UK Branches

 Halal Meat=  Animal Cruelty,Funds Terrorism, Slaughtered To A Pagan Moon God,  Aids Islamization, Muslim Job Creation Scheme At The Expense Of British Workers

Halal Meat=

  • Animal Cruelty
  • Funds Terrorism
  • Sacrificed To A Pagan Moon God 
  • Aids Islamization
  • Muslim Job Creation Scheme At The Expense Of British Workers 

Boycott KFC. Halal food funds Islamic terrorist groups

Below is a list of halal only KFC branches from their own website. Boycott and hit them where it hurts hardest, in their profits. 


At KFC we listen to our customers to help us to evolve our menu and the choices we offer. For some time, we have received requests to provide halal food in parts of the UK and as a result of this, we are running a halal trial within communities where we anticipate a strong demand for halal products.

We are running the trial in the following stores:

  • Newport West DT
  • Renfield Street RST
  • Birmingham Yardley DT
  • Festival Heights DT
  • Junction 9 – DT
  • Colliers Wood DT
  • Metro Centre FC
  • Manchester Fort DT
  • London Road DT
  • Central Croydon HSR
  • Colindale DT
  • Harrow Road EXP
  • Bethnal Green EXP
  • Wembley EXP
  • Colindale EXP
  • Hounslow West EXP
  • Edmonton RST
  • Tottenham Court Road RST
  • Bishopsgate RST
  • Baker Street RST
  • Tottenham Hale DT
  • Beckton DT
  • Oxford EXP
  • Derby DT
  • Edge Lane DT
  • Merry Hill DT
  • Elk Mill DT
  • Heaton Chapel DT
  • Pollokshaws Road DT
  • Teeside Retail Pk DT
  • Arndale Centre FC
  • Bristol Union Street HSR
  • Broadstreet RST
  • Earls Court HSR
  • Rochdale Kingsway DT
  • Helen Street DT
  • Alfreton Road HSR
  • Upton Park RST
  • Barking RST
  • East Ham RST
  • Meadowbank DT
  • Halifax RST
  • Junction 27 DT
  • Leeds Road DT
  • Meanwood DT
  • Haley Hill DT
  • Handsworth RST
  • Cape Hill DT
  • Kings Heath RST
  • Perry Barr DT
  • Star City RST
  • Barlow Moor Road DT
  • Northampton DT
  • Sheffield Arena DT
  • Dewsbury DT
  • Tyrell Street HSR
  • Keighley DT
  • Queens Road DT
  • Ingleby Road DT
  • Southall HSR
  • Courthouse Green DT SLAM
  • Kilburn HSR
  • Acton Vale EXP
  • Streatham RST
  • Burnley EXP
  • Derby St, Bolton DT
  • Deepdale RST
  • Seven Sisters HSR
  • Hackney EXP
  • Whitechapel EXP
  • Stratford HSR
  • Stoke Newington RST
  • Lea Bridge Road DT
  • Walthamstow FC
  • Seven Kings EXP
  • Forest Gate EXP
  • Slough HSR
  • Wycombe RST
  • Luton EXP
  • Harrow Weald DT
  • Leicester DT
  • Leicester High Street HSR
  • Birstall DT
  • Finsbury Park EXP
  • Wood Green HSR
  • Camden Town EXP
  • Leyton EXP
  • Leyton Mills RST
  • Woking HSR
  • Fulham EXP
  • Tower Hill RST
  • Peacocks Centre FC
  • Paddington RST
  • Leytonstone EXP
  • Edgeware Road EXP
  • Westgate Retail Park DT

We have worked with the Halal Food Authority to understand the requirements involved in supplying and producing halal approved products. We are delighted that the HFA have certified KFC’s products in these stores, and the store environments, as halal.

Another key consideration for us was that we were able to ensure that the halal certified chicken would also meet the rigorous animal welfare standards we employ in the UK, and we consulted leading animal welfare groups about this. We are pleased to say that there will be no compromise to our welfare standards.

We continue to insist that our poultry is stunned before slaughter, using a technique called ‘stun-to-stun’. We only buy high quality, Grade A, farm-assured chicken from trustworthy suppliers, who are contractually required to meet or exceed all relevant UK and EU legislation and this will not change.

You will find that our food is just as tasty and finger lickin’ good as it has always been!

– See more at: http://www.kfc.co.uk/about-kfc/halal#sthash.Du2JQuTH.dpuf

Women Only Muslim Event 20th December Called The Attack On Gender Segregation

H/T: The Islamic Far Right In Britain

Pretty ironic that this Fridays event at the Waterlilly in London called “The Attack On Gender Segregation In Islam” is for women only. Wouldn’t that be as sexist as a male only event? The gender segregation issue isn’t about sexism against women. Because a male who may wish to sit with his wife can’t exactly the same as if it was the other way round. Its about Muslim ways being pushed on students in a British university. Basically the extremist nutjobs dictating what is and isn’t permissible in a nation that promotes freedom of choice.

Opening peoples eyes to the threat that Political Islam poses to all our futures. Counter Jihad, Opposing the Islamization And Stealth Jihad of our infidel lands, Anti Rape-Jihad, Exposing Muslim Grooming Gangs, Reverse Dawah, Highlighting Pro Muslim Media Bias And Reverse Racism, Campaigning Against New Mosque Building, Against Inhumane Halal Slaughtered Food. Hater Of All Terrorism And Violence

%d bloggers like this: