Tag Archives: ISLAMIC

MuslimTeacher Zameer Ghumra Jailed For Showing Beheading Videos To Kids At UK Madrassa

Muslim extremist Zameer Ghumra has been jailed for six years for his attempted brain washing of schoolboys at his madrassa (Muslim school). The Islamofascist from Leicster abused his position of trust at the religious school.Using the opportunity to try and radicalise a future generation of jihadis. During lessons the Muslim schoolboys were shown ISIS beheading videos. Zameer Ghumra also promoted the Islamic jihad in Syria portraying ISIS terrorists as some kind of oppressed victims just defending their homes. He also encouraged the children not to have non Muslim friends and integrate with British society.

British pharmacist jailed for showing beheading video to kids
Zameer Ghumra was found guilty of disseminating terrorist propaganda and trying to brainwash young boys

Image Credit: Social Media/Twitter
Zameer Ghumra
Published: 09:33 October 7, 2017

London: A British man was on Friday sentenced to six years’ imprisonment by a UK court for showing a Daesh beheading video to schoolchildren.
Zameer Ghumra was found guilty of disseminating terrorist propaganda and trying to brainwash young boys into supporting Daesh at Nottingham Crown Court on Friday.

The 38-year-old pharmacist, believed to be of Arabic origin, also told the children they should kill anyone who insulted Islam and instructed them to make only Muslim friends.
“These were shocking crimes which damaged the children and caused offence to the vast majority of law-abiding Muslims,” Judge Gregory Dickson said.
The judge also noted the lack of remorse shown by Ghumra during his trial when determining his sentence.


The jury was told that the children, who came in contact with the accused at a madrassa he had set up, were encouraged to go to Syria to fight with the Daesh where they would have to behead people. Ghumra also followed various Daesh-linked social media accounts and made the two children follow similar accounts. Prosecutor Simon Davis said Ghumra had told a customer that Daesh were “not bad people – they’re only defending themselves”.
Ghumra, from the city of Leicester, was working as a pharmacist in Oundle, Northamptonshire, when he was arrested at Birmingham Airport in September 2015.
He had denied the charges and claimed that the children had been induced to make “false allegations” against him.
Sue Hemming of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said: “Zameer Ghumra tried to brainwash impressionable children with this violent ideology by making one watch beheading videos and urging them both to adopt a hard line religious outlook.”
“The CPS case was that he intended to radicalise them in the hope that they would go on to be involved in terrorism.
“The children were brave to give evidence and we would like to thank them for helping to secure this conviction of a dangerous man,” Hemming said.
Ghumra was found guilty of the charge of disseminating “terrorist propaganda” in the form of a graphic Twitter video on his mobile phone between January 2013 and September 2014.
Detective Chief Superintendent Martin Snowden, head of Counter Terrorism Policing North East, said: “That act alone is unforgivable. His teaching role increases his risk, potentially giving him direct access to young or vulnerable people who may look up to him as an authority figure.”

Muslim School Banned From Taking New Pupils Over Twisted And Extremist Lessons

Islamic school Jamia al-Hudaa in Notts has been banned from taking in any new pupils following an Ofsted inspection of the private Muslim girls school. The report highlighted major concerns regarding ‘extremism’ and ‘twisted ideologies’ being taught in the classroom. 

Jamia al-Hudaa School is run by Madni Trust, an Islamic charity with a £million turnover

It seems the school has taught their hardcore version of Islam for over a decide where community cohesion, integration and British values are non existent as this former pupil at the school explains:


I attended Jamia Al-Hudaa Residential College for Girls in Nottingham for my high school education from 2000-2006. It is a private school which relies on fees paid for by parents and donations from the registered charity Madni Trust which also caters for a boy’s boarding school in Sheffield. It is a Deobandi school which primarily follows the Sunni Hanifi school of thought. In terms of non-religious subjects we took English, Mathematics, Science (without evolution or sex education), Urdu, Arabic, I.C.T and P.E classes were sporadic. Religious subjects included Islamic law, Quranic interpretation, the sayings of Muhammed, Islamic history classes which treated the stories of prophets as actual historical events and memorisation of the Quran.

In 2014 I returned to the school for a university project in my third year after gaining permission from the head teacher. I found that very little had changed, except that they had installed CCTV cameras in the residential corridors.

While most of the below does not necessarily mean that the school broke laws, it is my belief that Jamia Al-Hudaa infringed upon the welfare, freedom and emotional development of its pupils, compromising our secular education in favour of intensive religious study.

We had no choice of beliefs, either we followed the school’s view of Islam or we were breaking school rules. It is important to really understand this – students were not given a choice about whether they wanted to practice Islam or not, and what type of Islam they followed. If we rebelled against the conservative Islamic school rules we could face detentions, suspension, public humiliations, cleaning, fines and expulsion. We sat on the floor with wooden benches to lean on when writing. Often girls would write on these benches, and as a punishment pupils were sometimes told to clean the benches with sandpaper. I remember my fingers aching from the sandpaper grating against them. As a pupil I rebelled and challenged religion often, and so faced a lot of punishments and disapproval from some teachers. I want to make it clear that not all the teachers were horrible, some were brilliant and tried to give us what they could with the little resources they had.

I was expelled in 2006 after a room check (something they did regularly without notice) as I was caught with a disposable camera: the school did not allow us to take pictures. Tellingly the school has never released a single picture of their female students or staff, as though it is too indecent to do so. Jamia Al-Hudaa for Boys on the other hand has uploaded videos of the male students on Youtube. I was publicly expelled along with a few other girls the next day. I was asked to pack and leave as soon as my parents were able to pick me up. The sense of humiliation and shame stayed with me for years.

As a young girl, it felt like almost everything was banned: listening to music, wearing make-up, chewing gum, being gay, challenging religion, teen magazines, befriending pupils that were older than you, locking your bedroom door for too long, having a mobile phone, talking to boys, plucking your eyebrows, wearing nail polish etc. The school expelled students who were accused of being gay. The management did not hide from parents of the accused pupils or students that they were doing this, even though it is illegal for all schools to discriminate on grounds of sexuality.

The school would also make us pray 5 times a day even if we showed that we didn’t want to. For instance, they would wake us up every morning for prayer, sometimes as early as 4:00 am by knocking on doors, switching on lights and telling students off for ‘being lazy’. They made it compulsory for every prayer to be read in the main hall in my third or second year. Wardens aided by older students would tick off the names of girls who attended prayer. If we missed too many without good excuse they made us sit in the main hall and read the Quran for long periods of time. On top of this we were told that our parents would have to pay a pound for ever prayer missed. We were also forced to fast. If you were healthy and not menstruating, the school would not provide you with food until it were time to break the fast. Some pupils had their own food, like noodles or microwavable pasta, but there was little chance of being able to eat a proper meal without someone seeing you, whether it was a roommate or warden.

The school didn’t provide much in the way of entertainment or methods to engage students. No TV, barely any Internet, a dusty and deprived looking library and a P.E cupboard which consisted of a couple of tennis balls and a rounder’s bat. The school also enforced hijab on the pupils. If we were in any part of the school where a man could see us through a window or where CCTV cameras operated, we had to wear hijab. This led to me being told off for much of the time that I was there because I struggled with the hijab. I didn’t like wearing it and I found the abaya (long dress) constricting. In the years that I was there the school did not take us on a single field trip, not even to a mosque or museum. We lived very simple lives consisting of classes, the two meals provided, home work time and spending time with our friends. Naturally I have some fond memories, for 5 years it was home. This does not in any way excuse the school for its poor education and the lack of basic freedoms afforded to pupils such being able to listen to music in the comfort of your own bedroom.

It is my view that the school has proven that it cannot care for the needs of children which can be seen in the most recent Ofsted report and I believe that the head teacher has broken the law by expelling girls on the grounds of sexuality, and she is not fit to run a school.

Posted at : https://faithschoolersanonymous.uk/2016/05/as-a-young-girl-it-felt-like-almost-everything-was-banned/

Is it any wonder so many Muslims  demonstrate such a narrow minded warped outlook of life when basically the only non Islamic things they learn are English and maths

Muslim school Jamia al-Hudaa banned from having new pupils over extremism fears

By DanRussell  |  Posted: October 17, 2016

Principal Raza Ul Haq

A Nottingham school has been told that it can no longer take new pupils and must partly close due to worries over “extremism” and “twisted ideologies” in the classroom.

The Jamia al-Hudaa Residential College has until Wednesday this week to appeal the decision by the Department for Education.

The independent Muslim fee-paying school in Berkeley Avenue, Mapperley Park, provides education for pupils aged four to 19-years-old, the vast majority of them girls.

There are currently 252 pupils on roll, with 171 of those named as boarders, but the Government has said the boarding provision must now close. The majority of the pupils pay up to £3,500 a year to study at the school.

Although it is an independent school the Government ordered Ofsted to inspect the school, which is part of the Madni Trust – a registered charity at the same address.

A spokesman for the Department for Education said: “Extremism has no place in our society and when we find schools promoting twisted ideologies or discrimination in classrooms, we will take action, up to and including closing the school or working with the police as necessary.‎”

Concerns were first raised in April 2015 when the school was judged to be inadequate. At that time, 15 of the independent school standards and 10 of the national minimum standards for boarding schools were not met. A follow-up unannounced inspection has revealed that standards have still not been met.

Her Majesty’s Inspector Deirdre Duignan released a report following the visit in April.

She said: “Inspectors found that the school does not promote balanced views. Pupils can access books in the library that have been written by controversial authors, for example by one who is not allowed to enter this country.

“Leaders were not able to say how these books supported the school’s curriculum, or how pupils who accessed such books would be helped to understand a different point of view.

“Staff do not have a clear understanding of the specific risks that girls at this school may be vulnerable to, for example female genital mutilation. Some members of staff have gaps in their employment history that have not been checked.”

Inspectors also found that training for staff is not up to date, there were “widespread” problems with bullying and that staff were not able to say where some pupils were.

Although the school has not been fully shut down, it could decide that the restrictions mean it is not viable for it to stay open.

The Post visited the school, which officially opened in August 1996, and spoke to members of staff.

Principal Raza Ul Haq said: “All of the inspection which was carried out was flawed, and we are going to appeal to the court against this order, and we hopefully will win it and this school will never close.

“We have been working for the last 20 years and will carry on working. We are providing a big community service and we will carry on providing this service.”

Nottingham East MP Chris Leslie said: “There have clearly been some serious findings by Ofsted. It is vital the school now answers.

“We have to make sure all education establishments comply with modern standards of education. I hope that the problems are resolved urgently because there will be a number of worried families.”


Paedophile Islamic Teacher Named Mohammed Islam Jailed For 19 years

Mohammed Islam :now there is a name that has a great deal of relevance to his kiddie fiddling crimes. A name made from 2 of the most vile words ever. Mohammed, after his false prophet who was a serial sex offender and paedophile. Islam, after his outdated backward religion which treats women as 2nd class, allows child marriages and promotes sexual abuse.

Mohammed Islams abused a Muslim girl who he taught Islam to. Muslim on Muslim sex crimes are something that we dont hear much of due to the fact his own community will ostracise him. While abuse of non Muslim girls is rife, it is also easier to justify others turning a blind eye to by citing various verses of the koran and haddiths . 

An Islamic studies tutor who raped a pupil has been jailed for 19 years after she delayed her abortion to prove he was the father.

Mohammed Islam, 31, started molesting the girl while teaching the Koran to children in the East End.

The sex attacks escalated in seriousness and continued until she moved to an address in Hayes, West London.

Snaresbrook Crown Court heard she ‘felt powerless to stop him’ when he eventually raped and impregnated her in July last year.

The 14-year-old delayed having an abortion so she could prove Islam was the father

‘A profile was obtained that was identical to this defendant,’ said Robert Brown, prosecuting.

‘The Crown say he was clearly the father of that foetus.’

Islam initially claimed his victim had initiated sex but admitted rape and sexual activity with a child on the first day of trial when she turned up to give evidence against him.

A victim impact statement provided by the girl’s father highlighted the ‘pain and distress’ the abuse has put his family through.

‘What Mohammed has done to my daughter has broken me,’ the statement read.

‘In our religion she is no longer considered a virgin and is therefore unable or unlikely to get married to have a family.

‘I am devastated. I am so angry.

‘I only hope and pray for her that this abuse will not have a long term effect on her.’

Judge Sarah Paneth told Islam: ‘I do not accept that a nine-year old child could possibly have instigated any sexual activity with you.

‘I do not accept that she could in any sense encourage you.

‘You were respected as a religious man teaching young children the Koran and while I fully accept that the community centre had no difficulties with you teaching children, what you did over a long period of time – five years – to this young child demonstrates to me that there is a significant risk of serious harm being caused by you to members of the public, as it is young children in this case, particularly young girls.

‘These offences have had a devastating effect on a beautiful and brave young girl who I was fortunate enough to meet when she attended court.

‘I hope that over time you will show greater empathy than you have for her position.

‘You seem, both from the pre-sentence report and from what has been said, to be most concerned about the effect of all this on you.’

Islam, of (Flat 22,) Trevelyan House, Morpeth Street, Bethnal Green, admitted rape, four counts of sexually assaulting a child and two of sexual activity with a child.

He was jailed for 19 years for rape and handed concurrent sentences of five years and two and a half years for four counts of sexually assaulting a child and two of sexual activity with a child respectively.

Islam was also made subject to an indefinite sexual harm prevention order and notification on the sex offender’s register.

Rape Jihad: Huge Muslim Grooming Gang Charged In West Yorkshire

coming soon to a town or city near you, Muslim rape jihad

Twenty five men have been charged with child sex offences in West Yorkshire following a major police operation. It comes as no surprises that once again the names of the paedophile sex ring are all non-English and very much Muslim. No doubt this will be another of those grooming gang cases that are kept as low key as possible for community cohesion reasons.

The men, mainly from Halifax, have been charged with various offences including rape, trafficking for the purposes of sexual exploitation, sexual activity with a child under 16, sexual assault, voyeurism, sexual grooming, conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16, causing a child under 16 to engage in sexual activity without consent and supply of a Class B drug.

The allegations, which date between 2006 and 2011, relate in the main to one girl who was aged under 16 at the time. However, one of the allegations relates to a second victim and occured in the same time period. All the alleged offences took place in Calderdale

All 25 men were charged at Halifax Police Station  and have been released on bail. They will appear before Calderdale Magistrates’ on Thursday, February 12.

The men are:

HEDAR ALI, 35, of Nantwich, Cheshire. He is charged with rape (x2) and trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation (x2)

FASIL MAHMOOD, 35, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 and supply of a class B Drug

ZAMEER ASIF, 24, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child

MOHAMMED RAMZAN, 34, of Bradford. He is charged with Conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16, rape and trafficking for the purpose of sexual exploitation.

KHALID ZAMAN, 37, of Bradford. He is charged with conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16, rape (x2) and supply of a class B drug

ATAF ALI, 32, of Bradford. He is charged with conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16 and voyeurism.

MOHAMMED FIAZ ASKAR, 32, of Bradford. He is charged with conspiracy to engage in sexual activity with a child under 16

AESAN PERVEZ, 26, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual assault (x3)

MANSOOR AKHTAR, 23, of Huddersfield. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2) and the supply of a class B drug.

FURQAAN GHAFAR, 30, Derby. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16

AFTAB HUSSAIN, 35, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual grooming, sexual assault and sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)

TALIB SADDIQ, 29, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)

AMAAR ALI DITTA, 25, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)

SIKANDER MALIK, 30, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16

AKBAR AZIZ HUSSAIN, 29, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 and supply of a class B drug

AZEEM SUBHANI, 23, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x2)

TAHIR MAHMOOD, 42, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x3) and sexual assault

MOHAMMED AHMED, 41, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16

HAARIS AHMED, 31, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x3) and supply of a class B drug (x3)

TAUKEER BUTT, 29, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16 (x4)

ARSHAD MAJID, 24, of Shipley. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16

CHRISTOPHER MULQUEEN-BENNETT, 36, of Newport (Gwent). He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.

MUHAMMED ASIM JANJUHA, 33, of Bradford. He is charged with rape.

HAIDER ALI, 39, of Halifax. He is charged with rape, sexual activity with a child under 16 and causing a child under 16 to engage in sexual activity without consent

SIKANDER ISHAQ, 30, of Halifax. He is charged with sexual activity with a child under 16.

Expect the usual Muslim head burying in the sand pretending there is no problem within their community and leftards attempting to concur their taqiyya with ‘Saville wasn’t a Muslim’ when quizzed about Muslims being massively overrepresented in grooming gang members. 

Video: ISIS Muslim Scholar Gives Lesson On How To Cut Heads Off

This video shows how Islam is evil to the core. Unlike other religions whose spiritual leaders try to lead their flock in a peaceful way. In Islam it is often those who are most religious and devout followers who are the most fundamentalist blood thirsty savages. 

In this video a radical cleric associated with the barbaric ISIS in Syria and Iraq gives lessons to his brainwashed followers on the best practices in chopping heads off

Police Could Be Sent Into Failing Muslim School

Another Muslim school in the spotlight for improper conduct.

Al-Hijrah SchoolThe school was placed in special measures last year

A council has said it will send police into a failing school if staff “refuse” to allow it to replace its governors.

Al-Hijrah School, in Bordesley Green, was placed in special measures by Ofsted last year after inspectors found evidence of inconsistent teaching and poor governance.

Birmingham City Council said it tried to replace the school’s governors on Thursday but staff had not cooperated.

The council said it would call on support from police “if it had to”.

But the chairman of governors said he will ask police to prevent a takeover.

Waseem Yaqub said the school would take all legal means necessary to stop the new board moving in.

He said a group of eight officials from the Interim Executive Board, as well as officers from the council turned up unannounced at the start of the school day on Thursday.

The school said that because the head teacher was not there, the chairman of governors not in the country and the official letter giving notice of the dismissal of the board of governors and its replacement had not been sent, they were right to refuse them entry.

‘Serious problems’

Mr Yaqub accused the authorities of perpetrating an anti-Muslim witch-hunt, and said he believed it was linked to the separate investigations into allegations of Islamification in a number of other schools in Birmingham

The council confirmed the Islamic school is not one of 25 being investigated as part of the Trojan Horse allegations – an alleged plot by Muslim hard-liners to seize control of governing bodies in Birmingham.

Peter Hay, the city council’s director for education, said the school had “serious problems in its governance” and Ofsted had visited it five times in the past year.

“There is a significant financial deficit – £400,000 and rising – and concerns about the level of support for improving education,” he said.

He added a quarter of the school’s parents did not like the standard of education, while one in five did not believe their child was safe.

“The local authority successfully applied to remove the governors and replace them with an interim executive board. We tried to put that board in place last week but the school refused,” he said.

But Mr Yaqub claimed that £250,000 of the school’s shortfall of £400,000 was largely the fault of the council, which he said failed to secure proper planning permission for temporary classrooms at Al-Hijrah.

The authority said it plans to return to the school on 2 June.

“It’s important the head teacher and the school cooperate with that interim board so we can quickly get to grips with the issues and secure the education of those children,” Mr Hay added.

“What happened last week was regrettable, but we have the right legally to do what we are doing.”

Muslims Demand Sharia Patrols in Deaborn, Michigan

Reblog fron: http://wizbangblog.com/2014/02/22/muslims-demanding-their-own-sharia-patrols-in-michigan/

Muslims Demanding Their Own Sharia Patrols in Michigan

During the public comment time at the Dearborn city council meeting, a Muslim stood to demand that the city institute sharia patrols to keep young people out of parks and to prevent the sale of “offensive” magazines in stores.

The man named Hassan took his place in line during the public comments and when it was his turn to speak he prefaced his comments with loud chanting of Islamic prayers. He then went on to demand that the city begin patrols of the parks because people used them for “sexual activities.”

The Muslim would not tell the council where he lived claiming he feared for the safety of his family but said he lived near Westland.

As reported, “Hassan also stated that there were magazines and newspapers at the public libraries and civic center that can ’cause colossal damage to a child’s health,’ asking the city to review and monitor literature before they are distributed.”

So, Mr. Hassan wants sharia compliant patrols to prevent people from using parks and he wants the city to perpetrate sharia compliant censorship at libraries.

Fortunately, the city council shot down Hassan’s demands. This time.

But this is how we begin to lose our nation to invading Islam just as it has happened in Europe, Britain, and elsewhere. Muslims use our own system against us, using democracy to destroy democracy.

First they have a few people complain at a public meeting. Next they have a dozen. Then they shame the government to concede in a few demands. Next they demand more and government gives them, more. Then they are allowed their own enclaves where they have full power and can ignore the rule of law (this has happened in Britain). Then they branch out from their enclaves and begin to force other areas to observe their medieval rule.

Be ware of this, America. Sharia is coming if these Muslims have any say at all over it. Sharia is un-American, anti-democratic, anathema to freedom and liberty and it must be stopped.

More 2 Tier Justice: Muslim Woman Who Scammed £35k Gets Suspended Sentence

A  woman from Yorkshire is the latest winner in Britain’s 2 tier justice why lucky Muslim criminals are given ridiculously soft sentences for crimes anybody else would be sent to prison for . Sidra Fatima and her taxi driver husband conned £35,000 in a marriage scam from 6 men. She was also charged with a £170,000 mortgage fraud and 3 fake burglary in order to claim the insurance. 

The judge said  ‘You both benefited from these frauds and it is clear you lived a very comfortable lifestyle.’ and then let her walk away with a suspended sentence and no mention of proceeds of crime payment. Instead of being a deterrent its a fill your boots incentive to other sinister Muslims 

Conwoman who posed as a ‘simple and sincere’ bride-to-be to trick unsuspecting suitors out of £35,000 with a dating website honey trap escapes jail

  • Sidra Fatima, 33, ran cruel scam for nearly two years, conning seven men
  • Judge says she left potential suitors humiliated, miserable and deep in debt
  • Mother-of-two, from Dewsbury in West Yorkshire, tricked men out of £35,000
  • But Fatima escaped jail, being given only a 12-month suspended sentence
  • Husband Raja Haider Ali, 45, threatened those who ask for their money back
  • Court heard how he told men he had already murdered 20 people in Pakistan


PUBLISHED: 19:30, 10 January 2014 | UPDATED: 00:17, 11 January 2014

Cruel: Sidra Fatima ran the scam for nearly two years, conning seven men out of £35,000Cruel: Sidra Fatima ran the scam for nearly two years, conning seven men out of £35,000


A conwoman who posed as a ‘simple and sincere’ potential bride in order to trick men out of money on an Asian marriage website has escaped jail.

Sidra Fatima, 33, carried on her cruel charade for nearly two years, and in that time managed to pull the wool over the eyes of seven men, getting them to part with over £35,000.

But the mother-of-two from Dewsbury in West Yorkshire today avoided jail, being given a 12-month suspended sentence despite the judge saying her suitors ‘had to put up with humiliation, debt and misery’.

Fatima said she was divorced and looking for a husband ‘who knows the meaning of love’ on dating website Shaadi.com.

But she was already married, setting up the scam with her husband Raja Haider Ali, 45.

Once they found a victim Fatima would arrange to meet him and occasionally meet their families.

Ali would often chaperone Fatima while pretending to be her cousin or brother

John Harrison, prosecuting, today told Bradford Crown Court that Fatima even had two profiles on the website to enable the defendants to catch more hopeful men in their trap’.

At the top of one of her pages Fatima described herself as ‘simple and sincere’.

Mr Harrison said: ‘The various suitors were not told that Fatima and Ali were married. Following the initial meeting, Fatima would agree to marriage.

‘She would then insist that the complainant hand over money to pay for the wedding and also to purchase items to for the wedding to give to her in the form of a dowry.

‘After purchases had been made and money handed over, Fatima would terminate the relationship, either by telling the complainant that she no longer wished to pursue the relationship of by simply not returning his phone calls.

‘The defendants made significant sums from this fraudulent activity.’


Misery: Potential suitors were left humiliated and deeply in debt by Sidra Fatima (left). Her husband Raja Haider Ali (right) threatened men who ask for their money back, telling them he had murdered 20 people in Pakistan


On one occasion, when a suitor asked for his money back, Ali threatened him, telling him he had murdered 20 people in Pakistan and showing him a picture of an AK-47 machine gun on his phone.

Some of the young men they targeted were left ‘burdened by debt’ as a result of the scam.

Reading from one victim impact statement Mr Harrison said: ‘[The victim] is still traumatised and embarrassed and has lost the faith and confidence in himself.’

Reading from another, he said: ‘She [Fatima] convinced him that she was a good person. He was convinced she was telling the truth and spent all his savings on her.’

Sidra Fatima said she was looking for a husband 'who knows the meaning of love' on a dating websiteSidra Fatima said she was looking for a husband ‘who knows the meaning of love’ on a dating website


One victim said in his statement: ‘She is good at using emotional blackmail so I spent more on her than I wanted to.’

Unemployed Fatima and her taxi driver husband pleaded guilty in the middle of their trial last year.

The court heard the marriage scam was part of a variety of fraud offences committed by Fatima and Ali.

Sentencing Fatima to a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two-years and Ali to two-and-a-half years in jail, Judge Colin Burn said: ‘You both benefited from these frauds and it is clear you lived a very comfortable lifestyle.’

‘You cheated suitors who had to put up with humiliation, debt and misery.’

The court heard when arrested a Jaguar car was in Fatima’s drive and a Volvo was in Ali’s garage.

Fatima had previously admitted providing false details about her employment and income in relation to a £171,000 mortgage fraud involving a former home.

The pair had also admitted charges involving insurance claims for three ‘staged burglaries’ at the same property.

Ali, who also goes under three other different names, had admitted six of the marriage deceptions committed between May 2009 and January 2011.

He also admitted fraud charges in relation to money he obtained from a man who he thought would buy their house.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2537319/A-conwoman-posed-simple-bride-trick-unsuspecting-suitors-35-000-dating-website-honey-trap-escaped-jail.html#ixzz2q89SFtCs
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

FA’s Investigation Into Muslim Footballers Racist Quenelle Going At Snail’s Pace

The Football Association has released a statement regarding Muslim footballer Nicolas Anelka’s Nazi-style quenelle salute saying it is still ongoing.The also refused to reveal any details of its investigation, or even explain why they should remain secret.

According to press reports this week the FA rejected repeated requests to explain what form the investigation would take, who is conducting it, or even how long it was expected to last — although a knowledgeable source outside the FA said it could take up to four months for any progress to be made.

It has now been two weeks since the West Bromwich Albion player made the gesture as part of a goal celebration during a Premier League match against West Ham United. If their investigation goes any slower it will stop still. Personally i don’t see what exactly they have to investigate.Its pretty straight forward as the pictures are there for all to. Anelka has even admitted making the gesture, only claiming he didn’t know it was a racist sign.

Anelka’s claims he didn’t know the quenelle was racist  is a load of rubbish. Anybody who is non-Muslim or UAF with any common sense knows that he is a liar . The creator of the racist salute some Muslim bigot called Dieudonné, is good friends with Anelka and who he claimed his celebration was a to tribute. The man is a well-known Islamofascist in France with numerous convictions for racial hatred. So Anelka happily poses with his racist mate for his picture making the quenelle and didn’t ask why, yea OK! Did somebody who is that good a friend that he honoured him in a goal celebration, never mention all his racist convictions or that he has started a racist trend off amongst Muslims.The French public are fully aware of what it signifies, so why wouldn’t Anelka know that its racist also.

He is full of it and in a way insulting both the public and the FA’s intelligence by thinking were all idiots.

Did the FA act like snails when Luis Suarez made racist comments to Patrice Evra? Did they say an investigation will take up  to four months? No they came down on him like a ton of bricks and charged him because the victim was an ethnic minority even though it was all based on hearsay and one persons word against another. The whole word saw Anelka thinking he was clever and that he could do it and get away with it.

What kind of message does it send out from the FA with all their anti racism stuff they keep pumping out. They will stamp out racism from football……but only if it is a white person being racist…..if your non white its OK especially if your Muslim as well because we definitely can’t be upsetting the Muslims in case they feel victimized and it leads to a surge of anti Muslim attacks like TellMama claim everything else does.

If the FA are going to run all these kick it out campaigns and ram it down our throats like they did after the John Terry incident. Then at least play it fairly and treat everyone the same irrespective. If not then they only have themselves to blame in future when it carries on happening and they are considered a joke.

Pakistani Asylum Seekers Married Mentally Handicapped Women To Stay In UK

Pakistani men targeting women with severe learning difficulties (pc way of saying retarded or mentally handicapped) in order to be able to remain in the UK is absolutely despicable. Is there any level they will not stoop to in order to benefit themselves. The cases were brought before the courts because the police and social services didn’t think the women were capable of consenting to marriage or to sex. That shows how severe their mental illnesses must have been if they didn’t even understand what they were agreeing to.

Both of the Pakistani men had entered the UK on student visas and had been denied further stay when they began relationships with the two vulnerable women who they then married in Islamic weddings. It goes to show the kind of low morales the Muslim clerics have by agreeing to marry them when they could see the women were not of sound mind to consent.

In one of the cases a tip off alleged the stepfather of one of the women  had received £20,000 for his daughter to marry the Pakistani asylum seeker. Despite the judge ruling the woman lacked the capacity to consent to sexual relations and lacked “sufficient understanding” to consent to marriage. She fell pregnant almost straight away after the wedding. What sort of life will that child have with a mother unable to care for it and a low life father who is that selfish and spineless he is willing to pay to marry a mentally handicapped woman then get her pregnant in order not to be deported. 

Judges rule on Muslim marriages

Two vulnerable women with learning disabilities were involved in Muslim marriages to Pakistani students fighting to stay in the UK, High Court judges have heard.

January 1, 2014 2:40 pm

The Court of Protection is part of the High Court and judges make decisions about sick and vulnerable people

One man had begun a relationship with a woman in her late teens two months after exhausting his rights of appeal.

The second married a woman in her 30s about six weeks after his application to stay was refused by immigration authorities. An anonymous informant had called to tell officials that the woman’s stepfather had received £20,000 “in consideration” of that marriage.

Details have emerged in two written rulings published on a legal website following separate hearings in the Court of Protection in London. Judges said no-one involved in either case could be named.

The Court of Protection is part of the High Court and judges make decisions about sick and vulnerable people.

In the first case, a local authority had asked Mr Justice Keehan to make rulings about whether the teenager had the mental capacity to make decisions about her life – including the capacity to decide about entering into a “contract of marriage”.

He said social workers became aware that she had begun a relationship with a Pakistani man in his 20s.

Local authority officials and police had warned that the man might commit an offence because the woman was unlikely to have the capacity to consent to sex and marriage. Nevertheless the couple had “entered into a purported Islamic marriage ceremony” at the man’s home about 18 months ago.

Mr Justice Keehan said the man had arrived in the UK to study in 2009 but an application to stay was refused after an immigration tribunal concluded that he had submitted forged documents and attempted to deceive officials.

“His rights of appeal were exhausted in June 2011,” said the judge. “It is in this context that he began a relationship with (the woman) in August 2011.”

The judge said that days after the marriage ceremony the man had claimed asylum because “he feared he would be killed by his family who disapproved of his marriage to a white British woman”.

He said the man had been refused asylum and deported in August 2012.

Mr Justice Keehan concluded that the woman had the capacity to consent to sexual relations but said she did not have the capacity to enter into a marriage contact. And he ruled that the wedding ceremony she had been involved in was a “non-marriage”.

In the second case, a local authority had asked Mrs Justice Parker to make decisions about whether the woman in her 30s had the capacity to consent to marriage and sexual relationships.

The judge said the woman had taken part in a Muslim marriage ceremony with a Pakistani man in his 30s in late 2011. She said the woman had become pregnant “almost immediately” and had given birth to a son in the summer of 2012.

“A Muslim marriage, not recognised in this jurisdiction, was performed between them,” said Mrs Justice Parker. “An anonymous informant had telephoned to state that the (woman’s stepfather) had received £20,000 in consideration of the marriage.”

She said six weeks earlier the man’s application to stay in the UK following the expiry of a two-year student visa had been refused.

He had subsequently applied for “leave to remain on the grounds of his marriage”. The judge said “immigration proceedings” were “as yet unresolved”.

The judge concluded that the woman lacked the capacity to consent to sexual relations and lacked “sufficient understanding” to consent to marriage.

Mrs Justice Parker said the man was basing a claim to remain in the UK on his right to family life enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights.

“The reality is that he is now relying on his marriage and fatherhood… in support of his claim to remain,” said the judge. “So, the reality is that whatever his original motivation, (the woman) is being used.”

She added: “(The man’s) position is bound to be self- serving.”

Mrs Justice Parker said the case had been about the woman – not her son. She was told that man wanted stay in England with the baby. She said plans for the little boy’s care would need “rigorous evaluation”.