Video: Muslims Attack Police And Vandalise Homes In Denmark

Anti social Muslims in Denmark resorting to one of the few things they excel at – violence

Its the same story across Europe. Where ever Muslims go they end up behaving in the same uncivilised way as they do in the backwards Islamic lands they came from. Complete disrespect for the authorities and the indigenous people.

Islamic migration to any non Muslim nation is like cancer invading the human body.Left unchecked, the cancerous cells begin multiplying and spreading  turning previously good working parts  bad. Eventually the body will be totally infested unable to fight back and its game over. Islam will have the same effect on Europe


UK Asylum Guidelines Suggest Accepting Claims From Muslim Brotherhood Members

It is no wonder that the UK is seen throughout the world as a soft touch and safe haven for  no good Islamists and terrorists to claim asylum when the British government publishes guidelines for asylum claims such as the one  for members of the Muslim Brotherhood(Aug 2016). Even post Brexit the lunacy continues.

The Home Office guide recommends accepting asylum claims from high ranking members of  Egypt’s Muslim Brotherhood. The guide also states:  “Additionally, high profile supporters or those perceived to support the MB, such as journalists, may also be similarly at risk of persecution. In such cases, a grant of asylum will be appropriate.” 

The Muslim Brotherhood were behind the Egypts ‘Arab Spring’ in 2011 which saw Islamists seize  power with Muslim Brotherhood frontman  Mohammed Morsi  elected president.  The Islamist group remained in power until 2013 when the military ousted them. MB   has since  been labelled a terrorist organisation by the governments of Bahrain,* Egypt,* Russia,* Saudi Arabia,* Syria,* and the United Arab Emirates.

The Muslim Brotherhood is a transnational Sunni Islamist movement that seeks to implement sharia (Islamic law) under a global caliphate. The group operates through both violent and political means. Founded in Egypt in 1928, the Brotherhood is the country’s oldest Islamist organisation and has branches throughout the world. While these branches operate under a variety of names and use a variety of social, political and/or violent methods, they share a commitment to the overarching goal of establishing rule according to sharia. The most notable and lethal Brotherhood offshoot is Hamas, the Palestinian terror group operating out of the Gaza Strip.  .

The Brotherhood advocates a deceptive strategy in democracies: appear moderate and use existing institutions to gain power by means of stealth jihad. It believes it can conquer Europe and other Western nations peacefully by this method

“After having been expelled twice, Islam will be victorious and reconquer Europe….I am certain that this time, victory will be won not by the sword but by preaching and [Islamic] ideology.” — Muslim Brotherhood Spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi, “Fatwa,” 2003

The Brotherhood uses democracy, but once in power it will replace democracy with fundamentalist shariah law because it is the “true democracy.”

“The final, absolute message from heaven contains all the values which the secular world claims to have invented….Islam and its values antedated the West by founding true democracy.”
—Former Muslim Brotherhood Supreme Guide Muhammed Mahdi Akef, Nov. 2007

UK: Muslim Brotherhood members can claim asylum from Egypt

British government guidance comes less than a year after UK decided not to ban the UK branch of the group

Egyptian members of the Muslim Brotherhood may be able to seek asylum in the UK, according to new guidance from British immigration authorities.

But the move could anger London’s allies in the Middle East – including Egypt and Saudi Arabia – which have declared the Brotherhood a “terrorist” organisation.

‘Each case will need to be considered on its facts’

The Home Office guidance, entitled “Country Information and Guidance Egypt: Muslim Brotherhood”, states that high profile or politically active members, especially those attending protests “may be able to show that they are at risk of persecution, including of being held in detention, where they may be at risk of ill-treatment, trial also without due process and disproportionate punishment.”

It continues: “Additionally, high profile supporters or those perceived to support the MB, such as journalists, may also be similarly at risk of persecution. In such cases, a grant of asylum will be appropriate.”

The documents states however that “low-level, nonpolitical or inactive members and supporters are not generally being targeted” and that they may not be able to show a real risk of persecution” before concluding: “Each case will need to be considered on its facts.”

It also adds that the group “are reported to have released a statement in January 2015 calling on followers to embrace ‘jihad’ and ‘martyrdom’ to fight the current regime” in Egypt.

“Depending on the nature of the person’s involvement, decision makers must consider whether one of the exclusion clauses is applicable.”

UK sends mixed messages about group

During the past two years the UK government has sent mixed messages about the Brotherhood.

In December 2015, then prime minister David Cameron said in a written statement that while the country would not ban the group, it had a “highly ambiguous relationship with violent extremism” and was “deliberately opaque”.

He added that the Uk would “refuse visas to members and associates of the Muslim Brotherhood who are on record as having made extremist comments.”

Cameron’s comments came at the same time as the publication of an of an 11-page summary of a review, which has been repeatedly delayed and has yet to be released in full.

The Jenkins review did not find direct links between the UK Brotherhood and radical Islam, but said that membership could be considered a “possible indicator of extremism” and that the group had been a “rite of passage” to violence for some members.

As a result, it said, the group would be closely monitored to ensure it was not breaking UK anti-terrorism laws.

UK allies in Middle East: Putting pressure on London?

The Jenkins report was commissioned in 2013 as Britain came under pressure from the UAE, Egypt and Saudi Arabia to ban the Brotherhood, which had been proscribed as terrorist in all three countries following the removal of Brotherhood member Mohamed Morsi from the Egyptian presidency.

Critics of the report have accused Britain of conducting the investigation under pressure from Gulf allies.

That concern was heightened last November when reports emerged of documents revealing that the UAE had threatened to cut lucrative arms deals with the UK, stop inward investment and cut intelligence cooperation if Cameron did not act against the group.

British ministers delayed its publication on two occasions, leading to allegations that the results would upset British allies in the Middle East. The final report remains unpublished.

In June foreign policy experts told the UK parliament’s foreign affairs committee that the report overemphasised the group’s connection to violence and was at times inaccurate.

Courtney Freer, a research officer at the London School of Economic’s Kuwait Programme, said the Jenkin’s review “overplayed the connection between the Brotherhood and violence and violent groups”.

The Brotherhood, which was founded in Egypt in 1928 but now has branches in many states, many of which have little connection between one another, has repeatedly denied that it has engaged in or promoted acts of violence.


Muslim Ex-Councillor Jailed For Huge Immigration Scam

A former Muslim councillor has been jailed for being the ringleader of a gang who were involved in a huge immigration scam. Facilitating Muslim immigrants who had no right to here by providing fake documents to make them appear to meet immigration criteria. You can almost be certain that their are countless other Muslim scammers up and down the country doing the same. Go down any main road in a Muslim area and you will see a staggering amount of immigration specialists offering immigration services


Disgraced former councillor jailed for nine years for masterminding family’s immigration racket

First published Friday 14 November 2014 

A DISGRACED former Bradford councillor, who masterminded a cynical and sophisticated immigration scam to make money, has been jailed for nine years.

Four relatives, including three sons, who Khadam Hussain recruited to the conspiracy were locked up with him yesterday for at least seven years.

Judge David Hatton QC said Hussain and his relatives had flouted immigration laws, duped innocent immigrants and put the reputations of respectable solicitors and estate agents at risk.

Hussain, 62, a former Conservative councillor – who was axed from the Council for failing to attend meetings, while claiming thousands of pounds in allowances – held his head in his hands as he was sentenced at Bradford Crown Court.
Hussain, of Box Tree Close, Girlington; his wife Zahida Parveen Hussain, 53, also of Box Tree Close; sons Adam Ashraf, 36, of Northcroft Rise, Girlington, Adnan Hussain, 31, of Hilton Road, Little Horton, and Gibran Hussain, 26, of Box Tree Close, and their cousin Numan Shafi, 24, of Hilton Road, were convicted yesterday of conspiracy to defraud after a trial lasting several weeks.

Zahida Hussain was found guilty by a majority of 10-2, and Adnan Hussain by a majority of 11-1.
Ashraf, Gibran Hussain and Shafi were jailed for seven years. Adnan Hussain, who also pleaded guilty to falsely applying for a carer’s allowance, was sentenced to seven years and three months.

Judge Hatton told the defendants they had all been convicted of a conspiracy to defraud entry clearance officers by the creation and submission of false documents in support of applications for entry into the UK.

The judge said: “This conspiracy involved a thoroughly dishonest, cynical and wholesale assault on the integrity of the immigration procedures, rules and regulations.”

More than 100 false applications had been identified. Judge Hatton said the conspiracy had been for financial gain, mostly on behalf of strangers and committed over a number of years. It was a sophisticated and planned operation.

Applications were supported by false stamps from firms of solicitors, false letters of employment, false property reports on available accommodation and false wage slips.

The judge said that, though some of the applicants were aware of the falsity, some were entirely innocent and were simply duped and deprived of legitimate applications which would likely have succeeded.

Judge Hatton said a number of responsible and respectable firms of solicitors and estate agents had their identities used without their knowledge, putting their good reputations at risk.

Applicants were charged between £200 and £3,000 for the defendants’ service.

Prosecutor Craig Hassall said an investigation revealed a large-scale immigration fraud, led by Khadam Hussain and centred on The Palace, a function venue on City Road, Bradford.

The court heard that, although functions were sometimes held at The Palace, the venue was essentially a front for the family’s principal business of offering immigration advice and documentation in return for payment.

The court was told that Khadam Hussain had never been officially registered as an immigration adviser and did not openly advertise himself as one, but it was common knowledge in the local community that he was the person to go to for help with immigration matters.

The defendants had provided more than 100 applicants with forged documents which suggested their sponsors were able to house and support them financially.

Mr Hassall said: “Few of the defendants’ customers would have been able legitimately to provide this type of information and their application would therefore have failed.

“By this deception, the defendants have assisted numerous people to enter the United Kingdom on fraudulently obtained visas.”

He said the estimate of the financial gain from the false applications was in the region of £175,000.

The crime came to light in February 2011 after Nasreen Karim, a solicitor and partner at Platinum Partnership Solicitors in Bradford, reported fraudulent use of her signature and company stamp.

Judge Hatton told Khadam Hussain he was central to the conspiracy. “You were its originator and its organiser. You recruited others, including your own sons.”

Khadam Hussain’s barrister, Simon Keeley, said the applicants were intending to come to the UK legitimately. “This isn’t a case aggravated by the use of false identities allowing unknown individuals to enter this country.”

Mr Keeley said there was an other side to his client’s character and he had set up an orphanage in Pakistan.

Judge Hatton adjourned sentencing on Zahida Hussain for a pre-sentence report and granted her conditional bail. But he told her: “You must prepare yourself for a prison sentence.”

Speaking after the hearing, Craig Swanston, from Home Office Criminal Investigations, said: “The sentences handed out today come at the end of a complex investigation into the criminal activities of a Bradford based organised crime group led by Khadam Hussain.

“His gang, which included members of his family, used fraudulent practices to cheat our immigration system and facilitate the illegal entry of foreign nationals into the UK.

“Today’s sentences reflect the gravity of these offences, and this gang are now paying the price for their criminality.

“We have specialist Criminal Investigations teams, and our officers are determined to bring anyone involved in this sort of criminality to justice.”

Immigration and Security Minister James Brokenshire added: “The Government is making Britain an ever more hostile place for immigration criminals as part of our determination to build a system that is fair to British citizens and cracks down on those who flout the rules.

“This gang thought they could profit from cheating our immigration laws, but thanks to the dedication of our investigative teams they have been caught and sent to prison.

“These sentences send a clear message to the gangs involved in this sort of organised criminality – the Home Office crime teams have the skills and experience to track you down.”

As Muslims Riot In Sweden, Police Take Action And Arrest Concerned Locals Protecting Their Neighbourhoods

Like the UK, Sweden has been swamped by anti-social Muslim immigrants over the past decade or so. The new uncivilized Muslim immigrants bring with them a whole new set of problems for the natives to deal with. Its a familiar pattern that has been repeated in every non Muslim nation that are unfortunate enough to be hit be Islamic immigration. Constantly demanding their own way,expect respect off everybody else yet giving non in return, unwilling to integrate and contribute to society in general. A surge in crime and violence.Subjecting infidel women and girls to a rape jihad .Political Correctness .leftist government  policies and Muslim appeasing and Muslims loving to play the victim then thrown into the mix has made the Sweden of  today.

Violent Muslim thugs rioting, looting, destroying property and setting cars on fire. All this as the police stand by idly watching their nation getting destroyed bit by bit yet failing to do anything about the problems. Even the fire services are refusing to put out fires in burning cars for fear of upsetting Muslims



Group of English vigilantes on night patrol May 24.  Photo: Submitted by reader

Group of English vigilantes on night patrol May 24. Photo: Submitted by reader

Swedes Take to the Streets to Defend Their Neighborhoods

Posted on May 25, 2013 at 13:56

STOCKHOLM. Faced by another night of terror at the hands of Almeda immigrant rioters, Swedes grown tired of the police’s inability to put an end to the unrest took to the streets Friday night to defend Their neighborhoods.

The vigilantes were described as a motley crew of Homeowners and Concerned Citizens, as well as neo-Nazi activists and football hooligans.

In the Stockholm suburb of Tumba, the police DECIDED to abandon Their EARLIER non-intervention policy as a large group of police officers rounded up and dispersed a group of vigilantes trying to fend off rioters.

The decision to round up vigilantes while, According To Stockholm Chief of Police Mats Löfving , “doing as little as possible” to stop rioters, met with a wave of protests in various social media and on the Internet. Representatives of some vigilante groups contacted Free Times to give their view of last night’s events.

– The number of police officers on the streets is simply staggering. The Police Appear to have focused all Their resources on stopping the Swedes,Fredrik Becklin , spokesman for the nationalist youth organization Youth Nordisk (Nordic Youth), said Friday night.

– It makes me sick to see the police clampdown on us Swedes with full force and without warning, using nightsticks and tear gas, while They do not do a damn thing about the immigrants. We are only trying to help Maintain order, while the immigrants set cars and buildings on fire, said a young man who wished to remainings anonymous.

The police, however, rejected the accusations as unfounded.

– The police Talked to them and checked ID on a few, two of them were removed from the scene, They were not arrested but “removed” as we call it, police spokeswoman Tove Hägg said to Free Times late Friday night.

– They were at the wrong place at the wrong time. They did not understand it themeselves and They had been told to disperse, but refused to do so.

Later during the night the Police Appear to have relaxed Their attitude to the presence of vigilante groups in the streets. The police is reported to have stepped aside and watched as a huge crowd of vigilantes chased immigrants through the streets of Tumba, chanting “the city is ours” and “we will do what the police can not do.” Several independent sources testify about vigilantes managing to scare away groups of rioters torching wastepaper baskets.

Photo: Police
Police in riot gear secure an area where a building has been set ablaze. During the riots firefighters have been popular targets for young stonethrowing rioters.
Photo by: Swedish Police
Unrest in Rinkeby.  Photo: Reader Photo
Cars on fire but no firefighters in sight. During the riots the Stockholm Fire Department has on SEVERAL occasions abstained from putting out fires in order not to provoke the immigrant rioters.
Photo by: Submitted by reader
During the week the riots spread to other cities in Sweden. This photograph by one of Free Times’s readers shows a playground burning in Linköping, Sweden.
Photo by: Submitted by reader

Source     (H/T http://refugeeresettlementwatch.wordpress.com)

Russians Warning to UK : ‘Open Door To Islamic Extremists’ Is A Ticking Timebomb

The Russian government has warned the UK that its open arms immigration policy allowing Muslim extremists to settle here is a ticking timebomb just waiting to explode.Security specialist Igor Korotchenko said has said MI5 should pay far closer attention to Muslim immigrants and those admitted as asylum-seekers. The Russians can see its a problem, patriot groups and anti Islam sites like myself are constantly questioning Britain’s immigration policies and some of the dregs we are letting in know its a problem. Yet our own government seem oblivious to what’s happening to our country, either they have been listening to the leftist and Muslim apologists playing it down or fear being branded racist by the same people if they speak up. Which ever reason it is they don’t want to know and tackle the problem. Its bad enough with the amount of home-grown terrorists the Muslim community has been producing lately. Without being the choice destination of jihadists around the world and seen as a safe haven for them.

Since Russia ditched the totalitarian evil communist ideology which ruled by fear and what will happen if people fail to comply. Its new relaxed attitude has opened the doors to the same Islamic extremism and terrorism as the rest of the civilized world. Britain should be cooperating with them the same as any other nations intelligence services. After all we are all trying to fight a common evil enemy in Islamic terrorists

Warning to UK on its ‘open door to fanatics’: Russian government says MI5 should watch ‘extremist Islamic’ exiles from the country in wake of Boston bombing

  • MI5 should play far closer attention to immigrants, said security specialist
  • Igor Korotchenkosaid has claimed Britain has created a ‘ticking timebomb’
  • Said some admitted as asylum-seekers, and are enemies of Vladimir Putin


PUBLISHED: 01:13, 22 April 2013 | UPDATED: 13:11, 22 April 2013

Britain is at risk from ‘extremist Islamic’ exiles from the North Caucasus who have been allowed to live in the UK, claimed an advisor to the Russian government last night.

The lessons from the Boston marathon bombing is that MI5 should play far closer attention to these immigrants, some who have been admitted as asylum-seekers, and are seen as enemies of Vladimir Putin, said security specialist Igor Korotchenko.

He has claimed Britain has created a ‘ticking timebomb’ for allowing radicalised Muslims into this country.

The Boston bombings should be a reminder that Britain is at risk from 'extremist Islamic' exiles from the North Caucasus who have been allowed to live in the UK, claimed an advisor to the Russian government last nightThe Boston bombings should be a reminder that Britain is at risk from ‘extremist Islamic’ exiles from the North Caucasus who have been allowed to live in the UK, claimed an advisor to the Russian government last night

MI5 should play far closer attention to these immigrants, some who have been admitted as asylum-seekers, and are seen as enemies of Vladimir Putin, said security specialist Igor KorotchenkoMI5 should play far closer attention to these immigrants, some who have been admitted as asylum-seekers, and are seen as enemies of Vladimir Putin, said security specialist Igor Korotchenko

He claimed an FBI ‘failure’ to heed Russian secret services warnings about Tamerlan Tsarnaev  could be repeated in Britain where intelligence co-operation with Moscow has been curtailed due to the diplomatic dispute over the 2006 ‘murder’ of Alexander Litvinenko in London.

‘It was a professional failure by American counter-intelligence,’ said Korotchenko, who is also editor in chief of The National Defence journal in Moscow, and an advisor to military chiefs.

‘The question we should ask America is why are they not co-operating as much as the Russian secret services want them to on matters of terrorism.’

The same threat applies to Britain, he said, ‘which has been willingly accepting terrorists and extremists from the North Caucasus.

‘This is despite the fact that four telecommunications workers from Britain were beheaded in 1998.’

He singled out Britain’s ‘mistake’ in giving asylum to Akhmed Zakayev, 53 year old prime minister of the independent Chechen government in exile who is labelled a terrorist by Moscow, but stressed others had also received a safe haven in London.

He has claimed Britain has created a 'ticking timebomb' for allowing radicalised muslims into this countryHe has claimed Britain has created a ‘ticking timebomb’ for allowing radicalised muslims into this country. Britain’s intelligence co-operation with Moscow has been curtailed due to the diplomatic dispute over the 2006 ‘murder’ of Alexander Litvinenko in London

A friend of actress Vanessa Redgrave and the late Boris Borezovsky, courts in London have refused to extradite Zakayev to Russia claiming he would not receive a fair trial.

‘Britain has created a ticking timebomb which could explode at any time by accepting these people,’ he claimed.

‘If MI5 believes that people who have terrorist experience in the North Caucasus will – coming to London – become decent members of society, they are wrong.’

Britain had allowed in “people who tasted blood and explosions and have learned the skills of terror”, he said.

‘It is very dangerous that a potential terrorist underground network is being created, more dangerous than the IRA.’

At the same time, Britain – like the US – had failed to co-operate closely with Russian secret services in exchanging intelligence on potential terrorist threats linked to the North Caucasus.

‘Russian intelligence in every question related terrorism are prepared to have the most open possible relations with any Western special services,’ he said.

But co-operation had become stymied by difficult ‘political relations and unresolved questions’ in relation to Britain, he said.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2312711/Warning-UK-open-door-fanatics-Russian-government-says-MI5-watch-extremist-Islamic-exiles-country-wake-Boston-bombing.html#ixzz2RCzAA1V7
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Denmark becomes a Muslim country

Reblogged from:  http://ejbron.wordpress.com/2012/11/24/denemarken-verandert-in-een-moslimland/

Denmark becomes a Muslim country


(By:  Soeren Kern )

“We should not get where Denmark Danish traditions disappear when a Muslim majority” – Tom Behnke, spokesman of the Danish Conservative Party.

Muslim Immigrants in a town near Copenhagen have ensured that the traditional Christmas display this year forced not continue, while even lavish money was spent on the Muslim Eid celebration (Eid) at the end of Ramadan to mark.

The controversy has led to a heated nationwide debate on the role of Islam in the post-Christian Denmark, where a rapidly growing Muslim population increasingly assertive in imposing its will regarding a wide range of social and societal issues.

The last riot concerns Egedalsvænget residential complex in Kokkedal, a town located about 30 kilometers (20 miles) north of Copenhagen, where Arab and Turkish immigrants now more than half of the total population.

At a recent meeting of the Egedalsvænget tenants association refused the Muslim majority in the Board consent to 7,000 Danish kroner ($ 1,200) to spend the joint annual Christmas event.

The vote came shortly after the same Board of Directors had authorized up to 60,000 crowns ($ 10,000) to spend a large communal celebration of the Muslim holiday Eid. Five of the nine board members are Muslim.

A Muslim member of the board of directors, Ismail Mestasi, defended the decision to the Christmas tree and party not to go ahead with the argument that no one had offered to organize the celebration. “Nobody wanted to take responsibility. A vote was taken and it ended as it ended. I do not celebrate Christmas, but I was asked to pick the tree. And I did not. ” But a non-Muslim director, Karin Blank Nature Hansen, spoke to him and said that she herself had offered to take responsibility, but they were drowned out by the Muslim Board.

Of the dispute, the latest in a growing number of Muslim-related controversy in Denmark, was first on 7 November report by the Danish Broadcasting Corporation (DR). Since then, the problem escalated into a national scandal and it has become an important topic for public debate in the Danish media as well as in politics.

A spokesman of the Danish Conservative Party, Tom Behnke, says he fears that there are people who want to change Denmark in an Islamic country. In an interview with DR Newssaid Behnke: “I think it’s very worrying that our efforts to achieve integration are so ineffective that, at the time when a Muslim majority, our good old Danish traditions put away and instead Islamic traditions are introduced. We live in Denmark and the people must adapt to the situation that applies here. ”

Asked whether corporations with a Muslim minority Eid party should fund, said Behnke: “We must not forget that in the past Eid festival the victory party was at the slaughter of Christians, so I do not know whether we have in Denmark should remember. However, the people are allowed to re festivals whatsoever to celebrate, but they also need the festivals in the country to which they have accrued respect “.

Behnke added: “There is no point to Denmark to want to change in a Muslim country, because you yourself have a Muslim background. That should never happen. On the contrary, we have mutual respect for each other. This is a lack of respect for the traditions of the Danes and their culture. We should not have a Denmark where Danish traditions disappear, when a Muslim majority. ”

The Danish police now investigating an allegation of racism against Muslim members. In an interview with the ‘ Copenhagen Post , “said the police spokesman, Karsten Egtved:” It must be determined whether the decision of the Muslim members of the board of directors to first ‘yes’ vote for the Eid festival that 60,000 crowns cost, and then ‘no’ vote against a tree crowns from 7000 to Christian tradition to celebrate, violating laws relating to discrimination against Christians and their traditions. ”

The fight over the tree took on 12 November a threatening new twist when a van with two journalists from TV2 News was attacked by 25 masked vandals. The journalists were to Egedalsvænget residential gone to a report on the story on video, but upon arrival was their van bombarded with stones and boulders. The attackers destroyed the van and the unfortunate journalists were expelled from the area.

According to TV2, the perpetrators were Muslim youths who tried to catch the interest of the media for the Christmas tree dispute the silence.

The local police have the side of the Muslim attackers chosen by blaming the journalists to explain, because it primarily a television car in the field had brought. Then Houtved of North Zealand police told  BT News  that he did not go he would have gone as a journalist of TV2.”You choose an area where tension is accessed.One can argue about whether it is wise. I probably would not have done. ”

Houtved refers to the growing number of no-go areas  in the suburbs of Copenhagen and other Danish cities that are increasingly autonomous enclaves ruled by Islamic gangs.These are areas where the  Danish police did not dare to come . (Here is a  new video that shows how the Danish Government native Danes bribes to get them where they live in immigrant neighborhoods).

In March, for example, did more than 140 Muslim gang members raided a courthouse where two fellow Muslims stood trial for attempted murder. The Muslims – all members of criminal street gangs that large parts of Danish cities have taken over – wore masks and bulletproof vests and they threw stones and bottles as they tried to March 6 with violence to enter the courthouse of the county in Glostrup, a highly Islamized suburb of Copenhagen.

Police used batons and pepper spray to the gang members to expel armed with an arsenal of 20 different weapons, including crowbars, darts, hammers, knives, screwdrivers and wooden clubs.

In the process Glostrup two Pakistani immigrants were involved, who were accused of discharging shots, and an attempt to two fellow Muslims to murder as part of a rival gang.The shooting had to do with an escalating gang war between rival Muslim gangs from Værebroparken Bagsværd residential area, a suburb of Copenhagen, and from Nivå Kokkedal and in northern Zealand. Of immigrant gangs are believed to be responsible in 2012 for at least 50 shootings in and around Copenhagen.

The immigrant gangs are involved in numerous criminal activities, including drug trafficking, illicit arms trafficking, extortion, human trafficking, theft, prostitution, theft, extortion and murder. Many of the gang members are ethnic Arabs, Bosnians, Turks and Somalis. There are Iraqis, Moroccans, Palestinians and Pakistanis involved.

In recent years the immigrant gangs geographically across Denmark. The gangs are located south of Copenhagen across the rest of Zealand, about the center of Nørrebro, to the suburbs Ishøj, Greve, and to Køge. The gangs are also active in Albertslund, Herlev, Hillerød, Høje Gladsaxe, Hundige, Roskilde and Skovlunde and many more Danish places.

Danish authorities estimate that each year more than 700 immigrants between the ages of 18 and 25 years for a permanent career in crime elect, by participating in gangs like Black Cobra, the Black Scorpions, the Bandidos, the Bloodz, the International Club or other of the more than 100 gangs currently operating in Denmark.

In August were more than 80 Muslim gang members raided a hospital in Odense, the third largest city of Denmark, in a failed attempt at a 26-year-old rival gang to abduct earlier in a shopping district Vollsmose was shot and stabbed . Hospital Police had to use weapons to prevent the angry mob victims of the shooting in hands would get. An ambulance and four police cars were destroyed during the violence.

More recently, Muslim gangs shops and bars in the Nørrebro district of Copenhagen extorted. They threatened the local entrepreneurs with violence if they refused to pay protection money, because they work on ‘Islamic territory’.

But some non-Muslims have refused to give in to the threats. Take for example the 67-year-old  Jane Pedersen , courageous owner of the ‘Viking Café “, a bar, because of its refusal to pay has been the target of repeated attacks by Muslim gangs. Pedersen has a Facebook page called “No to bullies, yes to beer”, that national and international attention for her case has drawn. (Look at this one video that was produced by the politically correct BBC , who manages to report the problem and of Pedersen Copenhagen with criminal gangs, without once using the word “Muslim”).

In an interview with the  newspaper Jyllands-Posten  Pedersen said: “Some guys came in here and told me that I have to pay to be allowed to stay in their area. I refused. I would be their grandmother, there is simply no justification for their behavior. ”

Soeren Kern  is a Senior Fellow at the New York-based Stone Gate Institute . He is also the Senior Fellow for European Politics at the Madrid-based Grupo de Estudios Estrategicos / Strategic Studies Group. Follow him on Facebook .



Outrage as Incompetent Rotherham Council Remove Foster Children From UK-IP Carers

Rotherham is back in the news once again for all the wrong reasons. It seems those in authority there just cant help but make problems and negative attention  for themselves. Hardly creating a good image of the town with constant controversy. If you was looking to move to Yorkshire , then Rotherham would be right at the bottom of the list. First a couple of months ago was the Rotherham Muslim grooming gang cover up which indicated a massive problem with Muslim men targeting white schoolgirls which police and social services had covered up. Then along came local labour MP Denis McShane. First he stunned the public at an EDL demo in the town by telling them “to fuck off” which he was forced to apologize for. Then he was exposed as a thief for fiddling his expenses.

times_front_page Rotherham Muslim grooming gang cover up which indicated a massive problem with Muslim men targeting white schoolgirls which police and ROTHERHAM  social services had covered up.

Now along comes the latest own goal by the lefty loons from the labour run Rotherham council. The removal of 3 foster children from a couple because they are UK-IP supporters.The council social services in their infinite wisdom have decided that UK-IP a legitimate political party who have had no previous controversies are  far right racists. Down to their manifesto to halt immigration for 5 years and withdraw from the EU. It would now seem anyone with an opinion on immigration or the failings of  multiculturalism is automatically branded a racist like their a white supremacist party like a UK equivalent  of the Klu Klux Klan. I was under the misguided impression that in Britain we lived in a democratic society where people  are allowed to make up their own minds which political party they support.

To brand UK-IP as racist is totally ludicrous.They are hardly anything like the BNP who have  certain views which make them bordering on racists who themselves are a fair way off being on par with neo nazi white power types. UK-IP have landed the same un-justified racist label  that the English Defence League also did for speaking out about Islam. On neither UK-IP or the EDL’s official website or media will you find anything other than party policy’s which the political correctness loving left may not have the same opinion of.Certainly not out and out racism.


The socialist fools behind this decision want to stop listening to  fantasy propaganda that people like the UAF come out with. They will spot 10 nazi’s at a Jewish wedding if it benefited their own communist agenda. Even if they was far right or whatever since when did  some ones  political views make them a bad parent.Why should they be considered any more  a bad parent than any than a Jehovah witness who would refuse a blood transfusion for their child if they became ill.Or any Muslim that has ever attended 1 of the many mosques that has had a hate preacher as speaker.Surely that would make them an extremist. PC lovers who come out with senseless things like that must have that much human rights/pc stuff floating round in their heads that it has blinded them from the reality of the fact it will be those 3 children who will suffer worse from this after being uprooted from a settled environment.

Decision over UKIP couple fostering ‘indefensible’ – Gove

Education Secretary Michael Gove: "This decision is arbitrary, ideological, indefensible" says on idiots from Rotherham  council who removed foster children because the carers were UK independence party supporters

Education Secretary Michael Gove: “This decision is arbitrary, ideological, indefensible”

The foster parents say “no discussions” took place between them and the council prior to the children’s removal.

The children – who are European migrants – were removed by social workers who accused the unnamed couple of belonging to a “racist party”.

Council leader Roger Stone said it was launching an immediate inquiry.

The education secretary said the “wrong decision” was made “in the wrong way for the wrong reasons”.

He added that the Department for Education, under his leadership, would “ask the necessary questions” to determine what happened in this case.

Mr Gove told the BBC: “It is entirely wrong for this couple to have been treated in this way. That’s why I believe we need a full explanation from the local authority as to why this decision was allowed to be taken.

‘Ideological and indefensible’

“If we say you cannot foster children because you’re a member of a mainstream political party or because you have views on multiculturalism then that’s utterly wrong.

“This decision is arbitrary, ideological and indefensible.”

The education secretary added that the government was bringing forward new laws in the Children and Families’ Bill to reverse the current position, which takes into account ethnic and cultural factors when placing children for adoption.

“We want to make it clear that you should not allow ideological matters to preclude what’s in the best interest of the child.”

Rotherham councillor Paul Lakin, cabinet member for children, young people and families Services has ordered an immediate investigation.

He said: “Membership of a political party should not stop someone fostering children. The council takes its safeguarding responsibilities very seriously and always puts the needs of the children at the centre of that care.”

jobsworth loon Joyce Thacker, Rotherham Borough Council: The council's strategic director of children and young people's services, Joyce Thacker, earlier defended the decision, saying it was influenced by UKIP's immigration policy.

Joyce Thacker, Rotherham Borough Council: ”We had to seriously think about the long-term needs of the children”

Mr Lakin added he wanted the report on his desk by Monday morning.

The council’s strategic director of children and young people’s services, Joyce Thacker, earlier defended the decision, saying it was influenced by UKIP’s immigration policy.

She said: “I have legal advice I have to follow for the placement of children and I was criticised before for not making sure their cultural and ethnic needs were met.

“If the party mantra is, for example, ending the active promotion of multiculturalism I have to think about that… I have to think of their longer-term needs.

Ms Thacker added she did not think UKIP was a racist party, but said it had “very clear” immigration policies which she could not ignore.

UKIP immigration policy

  • An immediate five-year freeze on immigration for permanent settlement.
  • After the five year freeze, a strictly controlled, points-based system similar to Australia to be introduced.
  • An aspiration to ensure that future immigration does not exceed 50,000 people a year.
  • Regain control of UK borders by leaving the EU.
  • Repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights.
  • Ensure British benefits are only available to UK citizens or those who have lived here for at least five years.
  • End the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government

SOURCE: UKIP website

The unnamed couple in their late 50s, who have been approved foster parents for seven years, were eight weeks into the placement when they were approached by social workers about their membership of the party.

The wife told the BBC she believed the decision had been taken “prior to the social worker visiting us in person to tell us that the children were being removed because we were UKIP members”.

She insisted they felt they were meeting the cultural needs of the three children.

“We were actively encouraging these children to speak their own language… we enjoyed singing one of their folk songs in their native language.

“Having been told of the religious denomination of these children – we took steps to ensure that a school of their denomination was found.

“The children have now been placed with families who are white British, therefore how are these people going to meet the cultural needs of the children?” she added.

UKIP’s immigration policy states the party wants an “end [to] the active promotion of the doctrine of multiculturalism by local and national government”, and urges Britain to leave the European Union (EU).

‘Very strange’ decision

The party’s leader, Nigel Farage, said he was “very upset and very angry” about the decision and called for “heads to roll” at the council.

He added: “This couple… have been fostering for many years and are very decent people. This was an awful shock to them, not to mention the upset for the children themselves.”

He also accused the Labour-controlled council of bigotry towards his party.

Earlier, Labour leader Ed Miliband called for the council to urgently investigate the circumstances of the case.

even labour party socialist leader Ed Miliband said it should "not be a bar", distancing himself from the decision made by Labour-run Rotherham Borough Council.

Ed Miliband: “What matters is the future of children in Rotherham and elsewhere.”

He insisted: “Being a member of UKIP should not be a bar to adopting or fostering children.

“We need to find out the facts and the council urgently needs to get to the bottom of exactly what happened.

“There are thousands of children who need to be looked after, who need fostering, we shouldn’t have the situation where membership of a party like UKIP excludes you from doing that.

“We need loving homes for children across the country. That can come in different forms, it’s not about what political party you are a member of,” he concluded.

Robert Tapsfield, chief executive of the Fostering Network, said the decision seemed “very strange” considering the council viewed the couple as providing a good standard of care.

“Unless there was something going wrong then I can’t see why they would have been moved, unless it was to a family that could meet their long-term needs.”

He said the placement of foster children should not be influenced by their political affiliations.


Alan SoadyPolitical correspondent, BBC News

There’s been an outbreak of agreement from the main parties on the principle that being a member of a political organisation such as UKIP should not prevent someone from being considered as a foster parent. Michael Gove called it “indefensible”. Ed Miliband said it should “not be a bar”, distancing himself from the decision made by Labour-run Rotherham Borough Council.

The investigation announced by the government and the council will seek to establish the circumstances of this particular case.

But, politically, it will be interesting to see whether it has any bearing on political campaigning in the run up to Thursday’s Parliamentary by-election in Rotherham.


VIDEO: Anti-Muslim Immigration TV Advert From Belgium

Seems like even Belgium are experiencing their own problems with Muslim immigrants  going by this TV advert,

Muslim solicitor jailed for killing his wife

Muslim Solicitor Mohammed Rahman, jailed for a minimum of 18 years after beating his wife to death. His incarceration comes with the added bonus that he was an immigration solicitor so with a bit of luck there will be a few less illegal immigrants with 1 less person to defend them.

Solicitor jailed for beating wife to death

3:45pm Thursday 1st November 2012 in News

Rahman, 32, was told he would have to serve at least 18 years for murdering Jasmin Chowdhury, 32, at their home last December.Rahman, 32, was told he would have to serve at least 18 years for murdering Jasmin Chowdhury, 32, at their home last December.

An immigration solicitor was jailed for life today for beating his wife to death.

Mohammed Rahman, 32, was told he would have to serve at least 18 years for murdering Jasmin Chowdhury, 32, at their home last December.

She had been subjected to domestic violence by Rahman who was having an affair with another woman, the Old Bailey heard.

Judge Timothy Pontius told Rahman: “I have no doubt that you treated Jasmin violently, both verbally and physically, on a regular basis.

”You are a man who habitually tends to lose his temper, particularly with women with whom you are involved.”

The judge added: “You are undoubtedly an intelligent and educated man.”

Jeremy Benson QC, for Rahman, said: “He has had to work really hard to be a solicitor. He has now thrown that away.”

The court heard that after assaulting his wife, Rahman texted her sister telling her to remove her “dead body from my flat”.

Minutes later he sent a further text saying: “Get her out of my flat now before I kick the crap out of her”.Rahman, who worked at the Tower Hamlet Law Centre, killed his wife a day after her birthday and following years of violence and his infidelity, the court heard.

Concerned family members and police went to the flat in Cassilis Road, Isle of Dogs, east London, after receiving the texts.

Gareth Patterson, prosecuting, said: “Jasmin was indeed found inside, what can only be described as in a half-dead state.

”She had been left in bed. She was unconscious. Although still breathing it was with difficulty.”

She died three days later in hospital from a brain injury.

The couple met when they were both working at a supermarket in 1999, but the relationship turned abusive.

”She also disclosed the defendant had been violent towards her over a period of years. Finally it was that violence that was ongoing in the relationship that led to her death.”

After marrying in a religious ceremony, Rahman qualified as a solicitor and his wife worked in the NHS.

Other friends and family saw her finger had been broken, she was often left with black eyes and bruises to her back and shoulders, but she did not contact police.

When arrested Rahman denied causing the fatal injuries claiming his wife was “emotionally unstable” and would self-harm.

Outside court, Acting Detective Chief Inspector John Nicholson said: “Rahman is a violent man and it is clear his wife had suffered at his hands before.

”We would urge anyone suffering from domestic violence to get in touch with police.

”We take all cases extremely seriously and this tragic murder shows just what can happen if matters escalate.”

Mrs Chowdhury’s family said in a statement: “We are devastated by the loss of our sister.

”Jasmin was a kind, caring, thoughtful, selfless and beautiful person