Tag Archives: CPS

Justice For Chelsey Demo – May 13th – Sunderland : Victim Of Muslim Gang Rape Failed By Police

The residents of Sunderland will take to the streets on May 13th in show of support for local woman Chelsey Wright. She had first been subjected to a sickening gang rape at the hands of a group of vile Muslim sex fiends , then badly let down by the Police with their failure to prosecute the immigrant offenders. They hope to make people aware of her horrific ordeal and the authorities incompetence, in refusing to prosecute the asylum seekers allowing them to still roam the streets of Sunderland putting other women at risk  

Chelsey Wright was your average British woman, a mother of 3 children who rarely went out drinking and lived a very normal life. She could quite easily have been your wife, your sister, your friend or neighbour. This puts things into perspective and makes her story all the more horrifying. It is not only vulnerable teenagers in care homes or from dysfunctional families that are at risk from Muslim committed rape jihad. ALL WOMEN are potential victims to these sexual predators.

Chelsey has bravely waivered her right to anonymity to speak of her ordeal. In the video below she speaks to activist Tommy Robinson about how she had been on a rare night out with her mother and friend. After having only a few drinks, the rest of the night is a blank until coming round in a grotty bedsit  in just her knickers when she realised that she had been violated without consent.

Like waking up into a nightmare realising you have been raped isn’t bad enough, in the room with her was one of the Muslim sexcases responsible who refused to let her leave the flat, giving her a severe beating in the process. Eventually she managed to escape running naked down the road screaming hysterically.

Tests carried out following the attack showed multiple men had been involved in the rape. Blood tests also revealed the presence of date rape drug Rohypnol. Police later raided the bedsit and arrested 6 Muslim rapefugees from Syria and Iraq, though despite the DNA and drug test results Police failed to prosecute the Muslim deviants 


https://www.facebook.com/events/221881648306583/   -Justice For Chelsey Facebook event page 

https://www.gopetition.com/petitions/justice-for-chelsey.html sign the petition demanding action from the authourities

https://www.therebel.media/justice_for_chelsey  – Justice For Chelsey on Rebel media 

CPS Drop Trumped Up Assault Charges Against Tommy Robinson Due To Lack Of Evidence

Trumped up assault charges against Tommy Robinson have now been dropped due to a lack of evidence. Which is no surprise really as there was none to start with. Just another state stitch up to try and silence any kind of opposition to the spread of Islam. Reading Tommy Robinson’s book ‘Enemy Of The State’ will leave you in no doubt as to the lengths the establishment will go to do this.


13:06Saturday 16 April 2016
The former leader of the English Defence League has had a court case against him dismissed.

It was announced on Thursday that charges against Stephen Yaxley-Lennon – better known as Tommy Robinson – of assault by beating were dropped and the case dismissed because of a lack of evidence.
Yaxley-Lennon, 33, of Bedfordshire, had been accused of assaulting a man at HMP Peterborough in July last year.

After the case he called it a “stitch up” and thanked people for their support.

Read more: http://www.peterboroughtoday.co.uk/news/latest-news/assault-charges-against-former-edl-leader-tommy-robinson-dropped-1-7332865#ixzz460K4soYE

UK Street Preacher Charged By Muslim Appeasing CPS With ‘Religious Aggravation’ for Comparing Jesus and Mohammed

Muslim appeasing by British authorities has reached the point of utter stupidity. Apparently comparing the lives of the sinless Jesus Christ with Islam’s very sinful prophet Mohammed is now against the law !!!!

Despite hearing on a daily basis,  countless Muslim related issues including many which are of a sickening nature, on the whole i try not to let the things wind me up to much. This is one of the few occasions that has really got my back up and blood to boiling point.

Christian street preacher Mike Overd has been told by police that the CPS are bringing 3 charges of  ‘Religious Aggravation’ against him for doing just that. The charges are in relation that during one of his street preachings in Taunton, Somerset he made comparisons between the lives of Jesus and Mohammed which somebody took offence to. Why somebody should take offence at the truth is beyond me.  Even if they did take offence at the street preacher stating facts. It still does not make telling the truth a crime no matter if it offended every Muslim in the land.

Islam and its outdated, sexist, racist ,violent sharia law that permits paedophilia, bestiality and women beating offends me . it offends me not just a little bit, it offends me greatly. Whats more all those things that it allows are contrary to the laws of our land. So why is Mr Overd being treated different from the imams in any mosque in the UK ??? Why is he facing charges when his Muslim equivalents don’t ??? In fact why is he charged when every week radical Islamofascist hate preachers give sermons in Mosques up and down the UK promoting hatred with lies??? 

The evangelist preacher insists he did no wrong saying of the incident  “It was a simple comparison and it was factual. Muhammad did marry a 9-year-old girl. I have no hatred of Muslims in me at all and only preach the truth of the gospel “

FACT:  Mohammed married Aisha at 6 years old and had sex with her at 9 years of age.

Narrated ‘Ursa: The Prophet wrote the (marriage contract) with ‘Aisha while she was six years old and consummated his marriage with her while she was nine years old and she remained with him for nine years (i.e. till his death).    Sahih Bukhari 7:62:88 

I can think of much harsher things to say about Muhammed than Mike Overd did regarding his marriage to child  bride Aisha and still be stating truthful facts.  

  • If some crank next week said he was Gods prophet and wanted to marry a child in the infants in primary school would it be allowed or considered acceptable???  No, social services would be round taking the child into care at the first opportunity.
  • Is having sex with a 9-year-old considered paedophilla ?? Yes it most certainly is

 Therefore he was a paedophile pure and simple.!!!! If he was alive today he would either be locked up in prison on a segregation wing for sex offenders or held in a secure mental hospital for the criminally insane like Broadmoor. Like it or not that’s the truth, end of story !!!

Obviously the truth must hurt, for Muslims to run to the police and claim that the preachers comments offends them despite them being exactly as Islamic scriptures say.  If the CPS are making it illegal for somebody to state what it says in the quran, which to Muslims is Gods final words, perfect and to remain unchanged. Then the quran and Islam should also be made illegal.

Street Preacher Charged With ‘Religious Aggravation’ for Comparing Jesus and Muhammad

Street evangelist Mike Overd is being prosecuted in Britain for an alleged religious aggravation public order offense. (Facebook)

Street evangelist Mike Overd, a client of the Christian Legal Centre, is being prosecuted in the United Kingdom for an alleged religious aggravation public order offense.

The charges follow a complaint to police in Taunton, that Overd made a comparison between the perfect life of Jesus and the life of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad.

Police have informed the former paratrooper that the Crown Prosecution Service wishes to bring three charges against him under Section 5 of the Public Order Act.

A Taunton police sergeant recently gave an interview to BBC television and a newspaper locally, urging residents to film the evangelist’s preaching as it was alleged that Overd’s preaching was “causing offense.”

The officer has also asked local traders to film Overd if they believed he was preaching “offensively.”

Overd insists that when he made a comparison between the perfect life of Jesus and the life led by Muhammad, he did not speak in a hateful way.

“It was a simple comparison and it was factual. Muhammad did marry a 9-year-old girl. I have no hatred of Muslims in me at all and only preach the truth of the gospel. Recently a Muslim man came to my defense when I was preaching and a local shopkeeper started to shout at me.

“The Muslim gentleman didn’t take offense because he said he knew I was simply preaching what I believed and agreed there was no hatred in me. I’ve got this incident on video, and I also have video evidence of the incidents which have led to this forthcoming prosecution.”

Overd has been told his case will come to court before the end of this year.

Who Said Crime Doesn’t Pay? It Does If Your Muslim

When i was growing up i was often told by my parents, teachers and other peers that crime doesn’t pay. Now i have come to realise that what they should of said was “crime doesn’t pay unless your a Muslim” as the case of Shagufta Mahmood shows. Caught red handed by police with 877  blank visas worth potentially as much as £8 million, that had been stolen during a robbery from a courier van. In court she pleaded guilty to handling stolen goods with a value of 1 million pounds. As you can see this isn’t just £100 worth of shoplifted make up or a couple of car radios were talking about here. Its a very large amount of money so you would expect her to be looking at a big prison sentence.  

Even Greater Manchester Police serious crimes division, said it was an ‘extremely serious’ offence. Not only the amount of money the blank visas were worth on the black market but also “The ramifications of blank passports and visas falling into the hands of offenders both in the UK and then abroad, who could seek to those them to commit serious criminality and potentially terrorism, are huge.”

But as we have come to expect from British law courts and its 2 tier justice that favours Muslims for some bizarre reason. Mahmood was spared prison and given a suspended sentence like is all to common. The pathetic punishment for such a large offence even goes against the CPS sentencing guidelines for handling stolen goods.

Relevant Sentencing Guidelines:

Property >£100K or the offence is highly organised and bears the hallmarks of a professional commercial operation, a sentence of 4 years and upwards is likely to be appropriate, and it will be the higher where the source of the handled property is known by the handler to be a serious violent offence such as armed robbery. 4 -14 years.

Relevant Sentencing Case Law:

R v Hutchings and Others [1993] 15 Cr. App. R. (S) 498
Convicted of handling stolen property. The defendants handled bags stolen in a £65K armed post office van robbery. The defendants did not commission the offence and were not professional receivers. 7 years.

R v Leitch and Others [1986] 8 Cr. App. R. (S) 290
Convicted or pleaded guilty to charges of theft, handling stolen goods, or conspiracy to handle stolen goods. The defendants were baggage handlers variously concerned in stealing blank traveller’s cheques from mail bags at Heathrow Airport, and arranging for them to be encashed. The total loss was in excess of £1 million. Breach of trust in excess £100K carefully planned. 7 to 4 years.

http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/s_to _u/sentencing_manual/handling/

She must of  been laughing all the way back to the mosque when the judge gave her a suspended sentence. What a deterrent to other Muslims thinking about getting involved in major crime eh!! British justice don’t you just love it !!

Woman who had £8m worth of stolen visas spared jail

12 Feb 2013 17:58

A woman who was caught with up to £8m worth of stolen visas has been spared jail.

Police launched an investigation in 2009
Police launched an investigation in 2009

Shagufta Mahmood, 22, was caught red-handed with 877 stolen visas taken during a robbery in 2008.

Thieves took 3,600 blank passports and 4,500 visas from a courier van parked outside a newsagent in Chadderton, Oldham.

The visas were said to be worth up to £10,000 each on the black market.

The documents were on their way to RAF Northolt where they would have been sent to British Embassies worldwide.

Special units from Greater Manchester Police launched an investigation and recovered nearly 1,500 visas and more than 2,000 passports in January 2009.

In October 2009, five men were jailed for their parts in the theft.

Mahmood was an associate of the convicted men and had previously been in a relationship with one of the offender’s sons.

Following a raid at her home in June last year, police found a black plastic bin liner containing 877 of the stolen visas in the loft.

Detective Inspector Chris Mossop, from GMP’s serious crime division, said it was an ‘extremely serious’ offence.

He added: “The ramifications of blank passports and visas falling into the hands of offenders both in the UK and then abroad, who could seek to those them to commit serious criminality and potentially terrorism, are huge.

“With every document we recover we are substantially reducing that risk and that is a fantastic result not just for people in Manchester but across the UK and even further afield.

“Mahmood was clearly caught up in a far bigger conspiracy but by storing these documents in her loft she played a role in supplanting the dangerous circumstances I have already outlined.”

Mahmood, of Rosewood Crescent, Chadderton, pleaded guilty to handling £1m worth of stolen goods. But police said criminals could pay up to £10,000 each for one of the stolen visas on the black market.

She was sentenced to seven months imprisonment, suspended for two years, at Manchester Crown Court.

An investigation to recover the outstanding documents is ongoing.

Jury Dismissed In Hate Crime Trial of Man Who Ripped Pages Out Of Koran

I was going to write a post about the stupid hate crime trial of the man who exercised his right to freedom of speech and ripped pages from the Koran. Until i read this on fellow counter jihadists fahrenheit211 blog which somes it up perfectly

Below reblogged from fahrenheit211

Time for the DPP to put his money where his mouth is regarding free speech

Posted on December 22, 2012 by Fahrenheit211

The jury in a case where an athiest had ripped up his own copy of the Koran in a protest about freedom of speech has been discharged because they couldn’t come to a decision.

The ‘This Is Leicestershire’ website said:

“The eight women and four men on the jury at Leicester Crown Court failed to agree on a verdict.

They sent a note to the judge saying there was no prospect of them reaching either a unanimous or a majority verdict on which at least 10 of them agreed.

Peter James Crawford (52) was said to have torn pages from his own copy of the Koran and thrown the holy book on the ground next to a stall run by the Islamic Information Centre, near the Clock Tower, in Leicester city centre, on the afternoon of May 12.

Crawford, of Mere Road, Spinney Hill, Leicester, denied causing religiously aggravated intentional harassment, alarm or distress by demonstrating hostility based on membership of a particular religious group. The Crown Prosecution Service has 14 days to decide whether or not to proceed with a retrial.

Crawford was released on bail with a condition imposed that he should not to go within half-a-mile of the Clock Tower on Saturday afternoons.”

This case is an ideal opportunity for the CPS to act for free speech by dropping the case completely. He wasn’t, or didn’t appear to be physically threatening them, all he did was rip up a copy of a book, his own copy.

Recently, Keir Starmer, the Director of Public Prosections said that nobody should be prosecuted for insulting someone and said that there are many things that could be perceived as an insult to someone.

He said; “‘The clear problem of the outlawing of insult is that too many things can be interpreted as such. Criticism, ridicule, sarcasm, merely stating an alternative point of view to the orthodoxy, can be interpreted as insult.’

This case, with its Jury who seemed unable to reach a verdict as to whether he had intentionally set out to harass or whether it wasn’t, would be an ideal opportunity for Keir Starmer, the DPP, to put his money where his mouth is and send this case to the rubbish bin where it deserves to be.

Link to original story in This Is Leicestershire


Link to Daily Mail ‘DPP backs free speech’ article



CPS defend decision not to press criminal charges against taxi driver Malik Mannan who went on to kill his wife Sabina Akhtar | Manchester Evening News – menmedia.co.uk

CPS defend decision not to press criminal charges against taxi driver Malik Mannan who went on to kill his wife Sabina Akhtar

October 26, 2012

| Printable Version Previous | Next

Sabina Akhtar

A lawyer today stood by his decision not to authorise criminal charges against a man who went on to murder his young wife.

Mum Sabina Akhtar, 26, was stabbed to death by taxi driver Malik Mannan in September 2008.

Mannan, of Meldon Road, Longsight, was convicted of murder and jailed for life, with a minimum sentence of 17 years.

An inquest into Sabina’s death is taking place at Manchester Civil Justice Centre after the criminal trial heard that she told police Mannan had attacked her at least 25 times before.

Bangladeshi-born Sabina had also warned officers in Manchester that he would one day murder her.

Mannan was released without charge just four days before the murder after being arrested over the earlier attacks.

Today former CPS Direct prosecutor Richard Johnson, who ruled that charges should not be brought against Mannan over earlier attacks, gave evidence.

He told Manchester’s coroner Nigel Meadows that he did not believe that there was a realistic prospect of a conviction on the evidence presented to him.

Mr Johnson added that the case did not meet the ‘evidential threshold’.

Sabina’s family, who are represented at the inquest by a QC, are hoping the hearing will provide fresh answers into the roles played by the authorities.

They believe Mannan should have been charged over the earlier attacks, the inquest was told.

via CPS defend decision not to press criminal charges against taxi driver Malik Mannan who went on to kill his wife Sabina Akhtar | Manchester Evening News – menmedia.co.uk.

One third of whites claim they are victims of racism. reblogged from casuals

Reblog from Casuals United

One third of whites claim they are victims of racism #edl #uaf #evf


A growing number of white people believe they are the victims of racial prejudice in Britain, official research has found.

Almost one in three – 29 per cent – said they now expected to be treated worse than other races by key public services.

And the number of whites claiming to have been refused a job or discriminated against at work for reasons of race has doubled in the last five years, according to the Government study.

Flashback: Riots in Burnley, Lancs, 2001 when whites and Asians clashed. Many white residents claimed Asians were favoured by the authorities

Seven per cent believed they had failed to win a promotion because of their race, up from three per cent in 2003.

Three per cent alleged they had been turned down for a job for the same reason, up from one per cent.

In addition, the study reveals that most ethnic minorities living in Britain feel stronger ties to the nation than whites.

One in six white Britons feel only a slight sense of belonging to the nation.

Whites also now feel less able than other ethnic groups to influence decisions affecting their local area and the country as a whole.

For example, 41 per cent of black African, 36 per cent of Bangladeshi and 35 per cent of Indian people feel they have a say in decisions affecting Britain, compared to 19 per cent of white people.

The survey of 15,000 people – ordered by Communities Secretary Hazel Blears – is likely to prompt a fierce debate about the disillusionment of the white majority.

The Tories blame Labour’s race relations strategy.

Tory communities spokesman Baroness Warsi said: ‘It’s no wonder more people feel there is an increase in racism when Labour’s multicultural industry is forever talking up what divides us rather than concentrating on what unites us.’

The research found that overall, whites are more likely than those from ethnic minorities to believe that racial prejudice and discrimination is getting worse.

Fifty-eight per cent said they believe there was more racial prejudice now than five years ago, compared to 44 per cent who were interviewed in 2001.

The figure for ethnic minority communities has hardly changed, at 32 per cent.

The survey found that 29 per cent of white people expect to be treated worse than other groups by at least one of eight public services, including the police, prisons, courts, Crown Prosecution service, probation service, local housing organisations, schools or GPs.

Whites identified council housing departments or housing associations as the most likely to discriminate against them.

The proportion of members of ethnic minority groups who expected to face discrimination from one of the eight bodies fell from 38 per cent in 2001 to 34 per cent.

But it remains higher than for white people in many categories, particularly the police.

Tory MP Greg Hands, a member of the Commons communities and local government select committee, said: ‘It’s a dangerous phenomenon if any part of the population feels they are being systematically discriminated against.’

Overall, 84 per cent of people felt they belonged strongly to the country, including 45 per cent who said they belonged very strongly.

However, nine out of ten Pakistani and Indian people said they felt a strong sense of belonging, compared to 84 per cent of whites.

via One third of whites claim they are victims of racism #edl #uaf #evf #mfe « Casuals United Blog.

Sabina Akhtar inquest: Police told of husband’s ‘slaughter’ threats

Sabina Akhtar inquest: Police told of husband’s ‘slaughter’ threats

Sabina AkhtarSabina Akhtar had contacted police two months before her death

An inquest into the death of a woman murdered by her husband has heard details of his threats to kill her.

Sabina Akhtar, 26, was stabbed through the heart by Malik Mannan at their Levenshulme home in 2008.

Manchester Coroner’s Court was told she had reported his threats to “get a knife and slaughter you” to police two months before she died.

Her inquest was ordered to be reopened in 2011 due to concerns over breaches to her human rights in the case.

Mannan was arrested four days before the murder for breaching bail conditions put in place following her reporting of the death threats, but was released without charge.

The 36-year-old was jailed for life in March 2009 for stabbing Ms Akhtar to death at their home on Charlton Road in Levenshulme in September 2008.

Following his conviction, the Crown Prosecution Service apologised to Ms Akhtar’s family before Mannan was sentenced, saying it had been “wrong” not to charge him earlier.

Ms Akhtar’s relatives allege “stupidity, lack of organisation and inertia” on the part of Greater Manchester Police in the case.

‘Mental torture’

At the reopened inquest, Ms Akhtar’s police statements taken two months before she was killed were read out by Andrew Tattersall, a senior investigating officer from Greater Manchester Police.

In them, Ms Akhtar said Mannan had assaulted her and made threats to kill.

Malik MannanMannan was jailed for life in March 2009 for stabbing Ms Akhtar to death

She told police that she was suffering from “mental torture” and that her husband had told her “you have to listen to me, your opinion does not matter here. One day I will kill you”.

She had added that Mannan had grabbed her by the throat several times and said he was “going to get a knife and slaughter you”.

Mannan was arrested, questioned and then released on police bail.

He was re-arrested four days before murdering Ms Akhtar for breaching that bail but was released and continued harassing her.

In August 2011, Mr Meadows quoted “an arguable breach” of Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which relates to the right to life, for the unusual step of reopening the inquest.

At the start of the reopened case, he said although there was no intention to blame any individual for her death, he could recommend action to be taken to “prevent something like this happening again”.

The inquest is expected to last for three weeks.