Tag Archives: CLERIC

Muslim Mullah Chops Wife Into Pieces For Refusing To Wear Veil

A Pakistani religious cleric of the ‘religion of peace’ has murdered his wife and chopped her to bits for refusing to wear a veil. In a note left with the body he tries to justify her killing by claiming  ” she went against Allah’s orders”  by not covering her face. In his twisted mind corrupted by Islam he feels he has done no wrong. Clearly he holds his extremist version of Islam far higher than his own wife’s life.
You wouldn’t be far wrong if you was thinking to yourself, are these barbaric actions committed by this cleric how a true man of religion would act. After all you never hear of a priest committing such violent and un-religious acts in the name of God. That’s because Islam doesn’t have any kind of hierarchy as say the Catholic church which has the Pope at the top and an organized structure and a process for promotions from priest to bishop to cardinal etc.
Anybody can become a Muslim imam all that is required is a little knowledge of the Koran. There is no ordination process so it’s not unheard of for somebody to bully their way to that position.  Hence extremist hate preachers such as Abu Qatada getting a platform to spew their hateful views from to the Muslim masses.

Cleric confessed that he had deemed his action the best way to “punish his wife for rebelling against Allah’s orders”. PHOTO: FILE

MULTAN: A cleric cut his wife into pieces on Wednesday for refusing to wear a veil and sending their children to school, police said.

They said the body was recovered from near their house. They said they found his confession on the body and had also recovered the weapon he had used.

The body has been handed over to the family following a post-mortem examination.

A case has been registered against the confession-killer, who the police said had been missing.

Ahmad Aziz, father of the deceased Farzana Bibi, 36, said that she married Muhammad Sharif, 42, a resident of Bakkhal Bhir in Mumtazabad Colony.

They had three children.

Aziz said that Sharif led prayers at the neighbourhood mosque and also gave Quran lessons at their home. He said Sharif was short-tempered and would often beat up Farzana Bibi. He had been telling her to cover her face when she left the house.

Aziz said Farzana Bibi wore an abaya (gown), but did not want to cover her face.

He said they often quarreled over the matter.

Police said Aziz was informed about the incident by the police shortly after they found Farzana Bibi’s body. Police said it had first been seen by a neighbour, who informed the police.

Police said in his note, Sharif had confessed to killing Farzana Bibi.

He wrote that he had deemed his action the best way to “punish his wife for rebelling against Allah’s orders”. He wrote that he wanted all women to learn from their example.

He said he had not wanted his children to study at a school. Instead they should have gone to a religious seminary. He said Farzana Bibi had enrolled their children into an English medium school against his will. He said he had wanted to punish her for that, too.

He said he had been telling her to cover her face with a veil when she stepping outside, but she had not listened. He also wrote that he did not want to be responsible for her sins and thus killed her.

He said it had taken him time to make up his mind for this.

On Wednesday morning, after the children left for school, he wrote, he attacked her with a sharp knife, used to slaughter animals. He later cut the body into 10 pieces.

The station house officer said a police team was looking for Sharif. He said the children had been handed over to the parents of the deceased.

Published in The Express Tribune, August 22nd, 2013.

Great News – Islamic Terrorist Abu Qatada’s Family Have Left The Uk – Don’t Come Back

Fantastic news concerning the Muslim family of  terrorist hate preacher Abu Qatada doing one out of  the UK. It is one less burden on the British taxpayer,  who were being extorted to the tune of over 800 pounds a week in states benefits  to support the Islamic fundamentalist family of scroungers. Unfortunately as things stand at the minute. For every Muslim parasite leeching off the state that stops claiming like the Qadada’s. There is another 2 Muslim Asylum seekers or new immigrants at the job centre making a claim.


Family of hate preacher Abu Qatada leave the UK after dropping application to stay

THE family of hate preacher Abu Qatda have left the UK after dropping an application to stay in the country, the Home Office announced this evening.

Published: Fri, August 16, 2013

The-family-of-Abu-Qatda-have-left-the-UK-the-Home-Office-announced-tonightThe family of Abu Qatda have left the UK, the Home Office announced tonight

The Government department said Qatada’s wife and five children have left the country but the location they have travelled to is unknown.

Qatada flew back to Jordan in July to face terror charges after an almost decade long battle that cost the taxpayer millions to extradite him.

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Abu Qatada’s wife and five children have now left the UK.

“The family has formally agreed to drop an outstanding application for Indefinite Leave to Remain.”

abu qatada, jordan vile muslim terrorist bastardQatada flew back to Jordan in July to face terror charges after an almost decade long battle

Abu Qatada’s wife and five children have now left the UK

A Home Office spokesperson

The Daily Express reported last month that Qatada’s family were set to join him in Jordon following his extradition.

Their departure is expected to save the taxpayer over £40,000 a year and free up the scores of police officers who were protecting them.

The family had lived in Stanmore, north west London, where they had received over £800 a week in housing, council tax and child benefits and income support.

Qatada, 53, fled to Britain in 1993 with his wife and their first three children in 1993.

He claimed asylum on the grounds of religious persecution and was allowed to stay in Britain the following year.

abu qatada, home officeQatada’s fight to stay in the UK cost the taxpayer millions

In his absence the radical cleric was charged of conspiring to carry out terrorists attack against Israelis, Americans and other Westerners in Jordan.

The hate preacher went on the run in 2001 after being questioned over alleged links to a German terrorist group and was arrested in 2002.

He was detained at Belmarsh high security jail in south east London but was never charged.

Repeated attempts to deport him to Jordan were resisted by the European Courts on the grounds of infringement to his human rights.

abu qatada, home office, radical cleric, hate preacherThe Daily Express reported last month that Qatada’s family were set to join him in Jordon

Brussels ruled that evidence could be coerced from him under torture in Jordan and then used against him in a new trial.

Qatada gave up his fight to stay in Britain after the Jordanian government ratified a treaty guaranteeing him to fair trial.

His family have apparently been living in a council house in Middlesex for the past few months.

There presence has been protested against by neighbours and members of the English Defence League (EDL).


Finally Its Good Riddance To Islamic Hate Preacher Abu Qatada

Finally its good riddance to Islamic hate preacher Abu Qatada who has been deported at last. The jihad supporting cleric has been nothing but a drain on the UK’s taxpayers since he arrived in Britain as an asylum seeker after trying to enter Britain on a false passport. Unfortunately some halfwit who dealt with his case didn’t deem the passport offences serious enough to reject his asylum bid and instead granted it. Living off handouts leeching off the state system he paid nothing into, whilst plotting and inciting murder of non Muslims from his new London base.

Its took long enough to get rid of him, now we finally have all i can say is don’t bother coming back. Your not wanted here!!!

Abu Qatada: the making of Britain’s most notorious Islamist

How Abu Qatada, born in to a non-religious family in Bethlehem grew to become the Islamist terror risk that has seen him deported to Jordan, in the words of his friends, Islamist colleagues and family members.

Final preparations are underway for the deportation of Abu Qatada.

Abu Qatada was born Omar Othman in biblical town of Bethlehem in the Palestinian West Bank Photo: MATT DUNHAM/AP

By Ruth Sherlock, Amman

1:36PM BST 07 Jul 2013

Omar Othman was born in biblical town of Bethlehem in the Palestinian West Bank. A happy young boy, he would help pass hours in the family falafel restaurant watching his father serving Christian tourists and locals alike.

Today, Mr Othman, 53, or Abu Qatada as he is widely known, is being deported from the UK, labelled one of Britain’s most feared terrorist risks: a radical Islamist cleric whose sermons and writings have been found in the hands of Islamic extremists and anti-western bomb plotters.

Over the past year, the Telegraph has interviewed friends and relatives of Abu Qatada, building a profile of the hate figure that tracks his dramatic descent into extremism.


Little has changed in the downtown neighbourhood of Ras al-Ain in Amman, where Omar Othman spent most of his childhood. As war broke out in 1967 his family left Bethlehem, then administered by Jordan, resettling as refugees in this ramshackle neighbourhood.

Rows of small restaurants, and shops – selling everything from porcelain lavatories to books are crammed along the main street. Small grey concrete apartment blocks are crammed together on a steep mountainside, with a maze of narrow alleyways running between them.

“Omar was a normal child,” said Hassan Abu Hanieh, a childhood friend of Abu Qatada. “He was a popular boy in school. He was smart, kind and had charisma.

He took part in the drama committee, acting in plays. In the afternoons, when school was finished, we would play football in the street”.

In those days, the district was a stronghold for Palestinian guerrilla groups: “the central issue was the liberation of Palestine. There was no political Islam back then. People were religious but it was more a social phenomenon rather than a political Islamic ideologue,” said Mr Hanieh.

Regional events, the humiliation of the failure of Arab countries to “liberate Palestine” in the ’67 war with Israel, the Iranian revolution of 1979, the Soviets entering Afghanistan, and the clash between the Muslim Brotherhood and the Syrian regime, resulting in a massacre of thousands in the Syrian city of Hama had a profound effect on the impressionable young Omar.

“And then there was the influence of petro-money in the Gulf. People started to go to the Gulf and return influenced by Salafi Wahhabis,” said Mr Hanieh. “We started a change in Jordan; mini skirts had been in fashion, but now women began dressing conservatively and wearing the veil or nikab”.


Aged 14, Omar too began to change his attire to the long white robe, or dish dashes and turban worn by members of the Dawa, a group promoting Islam. “It was strange because it was not the fashion for youths to embrace religion back then. We used to tease him,” said Mr Hanieh. “He would try to get us to join him in prayer”.

Just a few year’s later, aged 17, Mr Othman was preaching at Dawa’s weekly meetings, which were attended by as many as 3,000 people. “He used to have a special way with words. It was unusual to hear someone so young speak, as it was usually a privilege reserved for the religious leaders,” one member told the Telegraph.

Against the will of his parents, he then decided to study Sharia or Islamic law in school. A teacher at Mr Othman’s school – a rundown grey-brown concrete complex – who did not want to be named, recalled: “He was committed, religious and righteous and he memorised parts of the Koran.” Ibrahim Othman, 33, one of Omar’s nine siblings said: “I remember my brother used to read for 20 hours a day.” Gradually Mr Hanieh too became drawn in, and he and Mr Othman became Salafis, Muslims practicing a strict interpretation of Islam: “I remember we burnt all our pictures, convinced the images were irreligious and we used to ban people taking photographs,” said Mr Hanieh.

After studying Sharia at Jordan University, Mr Othman quickly married a woman with a similar ideology to his (after he was spurned by a “true love” in university, friends have said) and, in the mid-1980s, he joined the Jordanian army, working as a religious leader or imam for prisoners for approximately four years.


Marwan Shehadeh, an old friend and fellow colleague in Islamist activism said: “He had disagreements with the Mufti – overall religious leader – because he had some strong views. Because of this he left the military.

He started to become more politically and religiously active, joining the hardline Islamist group ‘Ansar wa-Sunna’. “We published books and leaflets preaching a hardline interpretation of Islam,” said Mr Shehadeh, who has himself been arrested several times for his beliefs.

After continuing his religious studies in Malaysia, in 1992 Mr Othman joined the mujahideen in Peshawar, fighting the Soviet invasion in Afghanistan. Many Arab regimes encouraged their countries’ young men to go to the war.

But when the war ended, those same Arab regimes saw the fighters, pumping with testosterone, and now radicalised by war, as a threat. They were deemed outcasts, often arrested or banned from returning to their home countries.


“Omar chose instead to go Britain, and this is where he really began his path to jihad [holy war],” said Mr Hanieh. “He was behind a bulletin distributed in the Arab world that became the mouthpiece for the Islamic armed group, al-Ansari wa Sunna.” He arrived in Britain in September 1993 on a forged United Arab Emirates passport. He claimed, and was granted, asylum for himself and his family on the grounds that Jordanian authorities had tortured him.

Mr Shehadeh said: “Around 1994 he became a religious leader for radical groups in Algeria, Morocco and Tunisia. It was these groups that began to call him ‘Abu Qatada al-Filistini’.” A 127-page dossier by the Home Office claims that in these years, from his base at the Four Feathers Social Club in Baker Street, central London, Abu Qatada became a godfather of global terrorism, whose sermons and writings have inspired several members of al-Qaeda. Videos of his sermons were found in the Hamburg flat of Mohammed Atta, a ringleader among the 9/11 hijackers.

Mr Shehadeh said: “He issued a fatwa – religious order – permitting the killing of the children and wives of soldiers, because they killed Muslim children and women. Abu Qatada started to be a mentor for international jihad and he started to be also a point of reference for jihadist groups.” In 1999 Jordanian courts convicted the cleric in his absence of a conspiracy to carry out bombings in Jordan, which resulted in successful attacks on the American School and the Jerusalem Hotel in Amman in 1998.

Initially condemning him to death, his sentence was then reduced to life imprisonment with hard labour.

He is also accused of involvement in a failed plan known as the “millennium conspiracy” in the year 2000, to detonate explosions against Western and Israeli targets during millennium celebrations.


In the first few years of his arrival in the UK, “these jihadist groups were hardly targeted,” by British police, said Hanieh. “These groups had never targeted Europe or the US and so they were not perceived as a threat.” There was a “confusing and informal relationship” between the jihadists and Islamists operating out of “Londonistan”, to use the sobriquet of the time, and British intelligence agencies, a former Islamists based in capital city at the time have told the Telegraph: “They would provide us with a safe haven and the freedom to express ourselves and would, in exchange use us to pressure Arab regimes for their own interests,” he said, asking not to be identified.


That changed on the day of the 9/11 attacks. Controversial laws were quickly passed allowing for the detention of Islamists who were now viewed as a threat.

His friends claim that Abu Qatada “was against the 9/11 attacks” and the change of the focus of some jihadists from oppressive Arab regimes, to the “far enemy” of the west.

Nonetheless, on the eve of the new legislation in the UK Abu Qatada went on the run, avoiding being captured for 10 months. Since his arrest in 2002, Abu Qatada has been in and out of UK jails and detention centres – though never convicted of any offence – as the British government fought to deport him.

Last week Britain and Jordan signed an extradition treaty that paved the way for the cleric’s deportation by guaranteeing that evidence obtained by torture will not be used against him in a retrial.

Once he touches down in a military airport near Amman, Abu Qatada will be detained in Muwaqqer, the country’s best, and high security, prison, located in the Jordanian desert. Then will begin the long processing of trying him for crimes for which he was convicted in absentia.

On the dusty streets of his home neighbourhood of Ras al-Ain, his brother, Ibrahim, told the Telegraph: “Omar can stand trial because he is innocent and he will soon be released. I haven’t seen my brother in 20 years, of course I am happy he is coming home”.

More Sexual Jihad: Islamic Cleric Issues Fatwa Permitting Rape of Syrian Women By FSA

Further evidence of the sexual jihad happening around the battlefields of Syria’s ongoing civil war. Last week i posted about the underage girls being sent to the front lines to sexually satisfy the Islamist fighters of the FSA. Now another Sunni Islamist cleric has issued another sexual jihad fatwa permitting the FSA to commit rapes against Syrian women captured who are Shiite (non Sunni) or non-Muslim. You would expect so-called religious people to condemn such repulsive actions yet Islamic mullahs are have different principles than traditional religious teachers of other faiths. The clerics are no more peaceful than the horde of barbaric Muslims they lead. In their eyes everything is permissible when its in the name of Islam 

Islamic Cleric Issues Fatwa Permitting Rape of Syrian Women

NATO-backed rebels enjoy “sexual jihad”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
April 3, 2013

Another Islamic cleric has gone public to announce a fatwa that permits US-backed FSA rebels to rape non-Sunni women in Syria as part of a “sexual jihad” that has seen girls as young as 14 transported into the country to service the needs of anti-Assad militants.

Islamic Cleric Issues Fatwa Permitting Rape of Syrian Women 030413rebelsImage: Wikimedia Commons

“Salafi Sheikh Yasir al-‘Ajlawni, a Jordanian of origin who lived in Damascus, Syria for 17 years, posted a YouTube video last week where he said he was preparing to issue a “legitimate fatwa” making it legal (in the eyes of Islam) for those Muslims fighting to topple secular president Bashar Assad and install Sharia law to “capture and have sex with” all non-Sunni women, specifically naming Assad’s own sect, the Alawites, as well as the Druze and several others, basically, all non-Sunnis and non-Muslims,” reports Human Events.

As CNS News reported earlier this week, girls as young as 14 are being sent to Syria from other middle eastern and north African countries following a call by Saudi scholar Sheikh Mohamed al-Arifi for rebels to engage in “sexual jihad,” a so-called “temporary marriage” that amounts to little more than sex slavery.

Though he later backtracked after pressure, “al-Arifi had issued a fatwa saying Syrian rebels can “temporarily marry” Syrian girls as young as 14, and promising “paradise” to the “wives” concerned,” states the report.

The fatwa allowed “intercourse marriage” with captive Syrian women that lasts for a few hours “in order to give each fighter a turn,” which as the Human Events report notes, is “also known as gang-rape.”

Egyptian Sheikh Ishaq Huwaini also once urged “infidel captives” to be taken to “the slave market, where slave-girls and concubines are sold” and distributed amongst jihadists.

“You go to the market and buy her, and she becomes like your legal mate—though without a contract, a guardian, or any of that stuff—and this is agreed upon by the ulema…. In other words, when I want a sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her,” said Huwaini.

While innumerable reports of FSA militants raping Syrian women have been ignored by the mainstream media, the Atlantic Wire today claims that a mere 1 per cent of all rapes in Syria are carried out by opposition fighters and that the vast majority are committed by “regime soldiers,” despite evidence that Assad troops have repeatedly been ordered not to sexually molest women.

Syrian girls are also being raped by Jordanians in refugee camps,

“Men – usually from Saudi Arabia and other gulf states – are given free rein at the camp. Coming in the guise of benefactors offering charity, in return many want a wife, reports Channel 4 News. “But these are marriages of convenience – for the men at least. So called “pleasure marriages”, they give cover – a sheen of respectability – to what is often wealthy men exploiting vulnerable women for sex.”

It’s particularly ironic that extremist Salafist militants – who believe their cause is pious and righteous as they behead prisoners while screaming “Allahu Akbar” in anticipation of their 72 virgins – are still being labeled “freedom fighters” by the mainstream media, even as they gang-rape children and commit a plethora of other atrocities.

Raymond Ibrahim, an Associate Fellow at the Middle East Forum, noted that extremist Muslim support for making rape acceptable in Syria and elsewhere is by no means an aberration and that, “The only aberration seems to be the United States’ wholesale support for self-professed rapists and terrorists—quite laughably, in the name of “democracy.”

FEMEN Website Hacked By Muslim Extremists After They Launch Bare Breasts Against Islamism

Tunisian Islamofascists have hacked feminist movement FEMEN’s webpage and replaced it with pictures and satanic verses from the Quran to try and hide their Bare Your Breasts Against Islamism campaign they had launched. The campaign was started after a Muslim cleric issued a fatwa against a 19 year old girl from Tunisia  who had posted a topless picture of herself with the slogan “fuck your morales” painted on her body in a swipe at Tunisia’s new Islamist rulers.  Wahabi Salafi  hate preacher Almi Adel issued the fatwa against her saying 

“The young lady should be punished according to sharia, with 80 to 100 lashes, but [because of] the severity of the act she has committed, she deserves be stoned to death.

“Her act could bring about an epidemic. It could be contagious and give ideas to other women. It is therefore necessary to isolate [the incident].”

The killjoy sexist cleric thinks that a female getting her tits out deserves the punishment of a slow and painful death. Its amazing how these backward Islamic nut jobs take offence at something pretty much trivial like a pair of boobs as though they have some huge amount of morales. Then call for her to be killed in the next breath in a painful and barbaric manner like its nothing. 

Femen said in a statement they were furious about the

“barbarian threats of the Islamists about the necessity of reprisals against the Tunisian activist Amina,” .

“We are afraid for her life and we call on women to fight for their freedom against religious atrocities.

“Use your body as a poster for the slogans of freedom. Bare breasts against Islamism.”

FEMEN definitely have Kafir Crusaders support in their “Bare Breasts Against Islamism” campaign. I just hope that if its a successful way of protesting that the UAF DON’T adopt the same policy at their counter protests as i can’t think of anything worse than seeing pictures all over of Weyman Bennett and a load of old commie women half naked. Though it would be interesting to see if he has bigger saggy man boobs than the ugly old commie hags.

Bare breast against islamism

Mar 20, 2013

Tunisian Islamofascist hate cleric called a fatwa against the girl for getting her tits out in this sexy pic

Radical Tunisian islamists represented by Imam Adel Almi call for death penalty by stones for young tunisian girl, who took a naked picture of herself and posted on Facebook to support FEMEN movement. 26th of February a Tunisian woman, Amina Tyler, sent an email to FEMEN with attached photo of herself in the style of FEMEN with written message on her body  “Fuck your morals!”. The picture was posted on fan pages of FEMEN. Then Amina has created a fan page FEMEN Tunisia to support the movement from her country. Today the information about death threats to Amina from islamists was spread by mass medias, the call for death penalty was made the by Tunisian political figure and leader of the Association of centrists reforms Adel Almi. After getting info about threats for Amina FEMEN activists tried to get in touch with the tunisian supporter by phone, but the phone is switched off. FEMEN cares for the life of a young Tunisian activist Amina.

Femen denounces the disastrous Islamization of Arab spring with full devaluation of all revolutionary achievements! Bearded monsters will never intimidated brave acts for freedom made by women!

Muslims extremists are scared off the sight of boobs but love the sight of blood

2nd tunisian woman has now got her tits out against islam  in support of the 19 year old

Protest of Meriam from Tunisia supporting Amina: “My body belongs to me!”
Attention! We are furious because of the barbarian threats of the islamists about the necessity of reprisals against the Tunisian activist Amina. We are afraid for her life and we call women to fight for their freedom against religious atrocities. We call all women and arab women especially to take part to the antiislamist resistance and to force to shut up the preachers of the death. Use your body as a poster for the slogans of freedom. Bare breast against islamism. Send your photos on our email address femen.ua@gmail.com. The choice of the location is up to you, in your bedroom or in front of the mosque. The main point is that your naked body will become your chosen symbol of freedom. Your body is yours. If we will keep silence today then tomorrow each woman will be stoned to death by fanatics. Your bodies are your weapons ! We can join forces !


Bearded killers

Mar 21, 2013


Hackers of the Islamist movement have taken control under the  Facebook fanpage of  Femen-Tunisia. The attack was made after activity of FEMEN supporters in Tunisia, who posted topless pictures in FEMEN style to support the movement. “Thanks to God we have hacked this immoral page and the best is to come” was indicated by the hacker who signed the name “Al Aangour”. ‘The page has been hacked and if God willing, these dirt will disappear of Tunisia’, the creator wrote again.

The pirate has replaced on page photos of the different  FEMEN actions by videos of Suras and pictures of the Koran to illustrate faith of islam.

FEMEN says: “Keep showing your real face, freedomphobes”!


Nottingham University to host 3 Day Muslim Extremist Hatefest

More Muslim extremist hate preachers given a platform at a UK university to spread their evil bullshit. There will be no communist fake ‘anti racist’ groups making a stand against a real extremist threat to our nation so its down to the patriots to stand up for Britain and get this event pulled. Phone number to ring at bottom of casual’s post

Reblogged from:  Casuals United Blog

Nottingham University demos Easter Weekend #edl #nwi #nottsuni #ukip

The Islamic hate speech event being held at Nottingham Universitys conference centre is the three day event that we stopped in York. Main speakers are hate preachers who call f0r female genital mutilation, gays and non Muslims to be killed and who praise terror attacks.

Our representatives are meeting Notts police today to discuss a weekend of demonstrations and other groups are planning spontanious events. Some of ours were removed from campus by security yesterday after leafleting. We will not sit around while these people are allowed to spread their poison and hatred, welcomed onto University campuses by idiotic left wingers.

Everyone who can, let them know what you thing of them hosting Jihadis, and get along to the demos as well. NFSE




We have spoken to Notts Uni this morning and told them in no uncertain terms that if they do not cancel this Islamic hate speaker that is booked in a weeks time we will be along with various other groups doing a series of demos at their campus and conference centre.

Their new number is 0844 3461216

No hate speakers on our shores NFSE

This is the same mob below that we stopped at Reading Uni

The event

The event

Video: Saudi Cleric Claims Bin Laden Had More Honour In Death Than Any Infidel

Saudi Cleric Saleh Al-Maghamsi: In Death, Bin Laden Has More Sanctity and Honor than Any Infidel
Qatar TV,

The average Muslim look to Islamic clerics for guidance in virtually all aspects off life. That is how they are brought up from birth in Islam. They see the religious mullahs as an authority in virtually everything because they have studied the Quran. Come to think of it the Muslim clerics also believe  they are experts in every field even though they are far from it. Yet still they have a great deal of sway in everyday actions of Muslims. If a high ranking imam said to Muslims Allah wants you to stick your hand in the fire and you will be rewarded with 10 virgins in paradise, then chances are we would be seeing more than a few Muslims walking around with their hands bandaged up. So when a deluded ‘not the religion of peace’ cleric comes out with utter rubbish like saying ” In death, Bin Laden has more sanctity and honour than any Infidel ” Then all the brainwashed Muslim cult members literally take that as the truth. 

East London Mosque To Host More Islamic Hate Preachers On March 25th

The infamous East London Mosque is once again playing host to Muslim extremist hate preachers.Located on Whitechapel Road in ‘The Islamic Republic Of’ Tower Hamlets, the mosque and the adjoined London Muslim Centre seem to be never too far away from controversy. It is renowned for teaching radical Islam and being a breeding ground for Muslim extremists. The East London Mosque is an affiliate of Muslim Council Of Britain, a seemingly respectable front organisation used to defend Muslims and push their views on Britain.

The mosque is strongly inter-linked to the extremist Islamic Forum Of Europe (IFE) the shadowy Islamist group who were instrumental in George Galloway’s shock election victory’s and afterwards said he owed “more than I can say, more than it would be wise for me to say, to the Islamic Forum of Europe.”  The IFE also helped Islamofascist  Mayor Lutfur Rahman to gain the leadership of Tower Hamlets Council. Allegations of threats and electrol fraud connected to the IFE surrounded both election wins. The IFE also have ties with fellow Islamist groups The Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda.

Whilst publicly claiming they condone all forms of hate and extremism to the gullible non Muslim,

The East London Mosque works actively to promote tolerance and understanding

Our Imams and community workers encourage constructive engagement in society and a rejection of extremism in all its forms. We unequivocally reject all terrorism. During the rise of extremist groups in the 1990s, who spurned cooperation with others and denounced participation in the democratic process, the East London Mosque stood firm against this distortion of Muslim beliefs and prevented them from using the mosque as a platform for promoting their views. We advise worshippers to ensure they are registered to vote and to take part in local and national elections.

The mosque still plays host to radical hate clerics giving them a platform to voice their calls for jihad and other extremist views. The above tolerance claims for show benefit only as they make no effort to stop the extremism going on there. It will come as little surprise that the recent Muslim Patrol videos of radical Muslims trying to enforce sharia law were filmed outside the mosque.

On 25th March sees the mosque hosting ‘The Unshakables’ . In true sexist Islamic style this is a segregated event most likely with the women sat on the floor in the adjacent foyer or something.  Guest speakers of the extremist type appearing at this at this event are Abu Abdullah Yunus ibn Mahmood and Dr Khalid Fikri.

Abu Abdullah Yunus ibn Mahmood is the Muslim imam who is linked to radicalising terrorist and failed underpants bomber  Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. Arrested after he had apparently attempted to blow himself up on a Detroit-bound plane, Northwest Airlines Flight 253, 20 minutes before it was due to land. Abdulmutallab was accused of attempting to detonate a package of PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate) which was sewn into his underwear. He had attended events at University College London where extremist Abu Abdullah Yunus ibn Mahmood had been hosting. 

Dr Khalid Fikri is an Egyptian based in the UK. He is a well known campaigner for imprisoned Muslim terrorists.  In 2012 He held a protest outside Belmarsh Prison demanding release from prison of jailed Muslim terrorists including evil hook hand scumbag Abu Hamza  and fellow jihad lover Barbar Ahmad.


 Abu Abdullah Yunus ibn Mahmood is the Muslim imam who is linked to radicalising terrorist and failed underpants bomber  Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab. Arrested after he had apparently attempted to blow himself up on a Detroit-bound plane, Northwest Airlines Flight 253, 20 minutes before it was due to land. Abdulmutallab was accused of attempting to detonate a package of PETN (pentaerythritol tetranitrate) which was sewn into his underwear. He had attended events at University College London where extremist Abu Abdullah Yunus ibn Mahmood had been hosting.   Dr Khalid Fikri is an Egyptian based in the UK. He is a well known campaigner for imprisoned Muslim terrorists.  In 2012 He held a protest outside Belmarsh Prison demanding release from prison of jailed Muslim terrorists including evil hook hand scumbag Abu Hamza  and fellow jihad lover Barbar Ahmad.

Islam Channel Denial Taqiyya, TV Presenter said homosexuality was an ‘evil action’

The Islam Channel which is based in London have been rumbled by ‘The Pink News’ using the Muslims number 1 form of deceiving infidels, Taqiyya which basically means lying for Allah. Tell the kafir as much bullshit as is needed to blag their heads to make them think Muslims have done no wrong. Last week when the other Muslim TV channels were exposed by Ofcom as preaching hate towards non Muslims and Homosexuals. The Islam channel come out with a statement claiming they dont play that way and preach hate like the others. This week  BUSTED! 


Islam Channel TV presenter said homosexuality was an ‘evil action’

by Scott Roberts
20 February 2013, 2:19pm

Evidence has emerged of a presenter on the Islam Channel previously describing homosexuality as an “evil action” – with Ofcom subsequently warning the TV station of the need to take “great care” when “discussing sensitive issues such as sexual orientation”.

Last week, the Islam Channel denied that any of its presenters had ever aired offensive views about gay people.

However, PinkNews.co.uk has learnt that in 2009 the channel was investigated by the broadcast regulator Ofcom following a complaint over the advice given by an Islamic scholar to a gay Muslim.

The complaint concerned the ‘IslamiQa’ phone-in programme hosted by Dr Khalid Khan, a scholar, who had been presenting on the channel for over three years.

In an episode broadcast on 14 February 2009, a caller asked Dr Khan: “What I can do to repent as I am a practicing homosexual?”

According to an Ofcom document seen by PinkNews, Dr Khan responded by advising the caller to “associate with people who are pious, people who are free of these evil actions… [and] make repentance to Allah, dissociate from every evil thing that will remind you of the evil action”.

Ofcom noted that Dr Khan had said that being a practicing homosexual was “the greatest of the Haram” [i.e. forbidden], “greatest of the evil actions for which Allah destroyed communities”.

In responding to the complaint on 6 May 2009, Ofcom ruled that while Dr Khan’s use of the word “evil” to describe homosexuality “would be offensive to some people”, it did not amount to a breach of the Broadcasting Code.

Ofcom declared:

“The Code does not prohibit the broadcast of offensive material, if it can be justified by the context. In this case, a Muslim caller asked the presenter for the latter’s views on homosexuality and what the caller could do to repent. The call was therefore set up as a request from a practicing Muslim, who was actively seeking to repent for his actions as ‘a practicing homosexual’.

In addition, Dr Khan was giving his interpretation of Islamic teaching on the issue of homosexuality. In general, the tone of Dr Khan’s response was measured and he referred to the act of homosexuality, in his interpretation of Islamic teaching, as being ‘evil’, rather than the caller himself.

Ofcom recognises that religious teaching on particular aspects of human activity can be controversial and challenging. It is Ofcom’s understanding that, in general, Islamic teaching prohibits homosexuality and on some interpretations of the Qur’anic text, describes homosexuality as evil. However, we also recognise that the content in question was on an Islamic channel, in a programme that highlighted interpretations of Islamic teachings and texts by Islamic scholars, and that the caller was actively seeking advice as to how to repent, as a practicing Muslim.”

Although the Islam Channel was found not to have breached the Broadcasting Code Ofcom warned the TV station that it was important to take “great care” when “discussing sensitive issues such as sexual orientation”.

The regulator said: “although the content did not breach the Code on this occasion, we wrote to Islam Channel to remind them of the great care that needs to be taken in discussing sensitive issues such as sexual orientation. In this context, we welcome the steps that the broadcaster has already taken to highlight to the presenter concerned, the requirements of the Code in relation to harm and offence as they pertain to sexual orientation.”

PinkNews has asked the Islam Channel to comment on this story, although we have yet to receive a response.


UK Muslim TV Channels Preach Hate And Violence

Reports that Islamic TV channels on the UK’s Sky network preach hate and violence to its viewers comes as little surprise to me. Muslim channels Peace TV, Noor TV, DM Digital and Takbeer Tv were among the channels guilty of preaching hateful and extremist views to British Muslims sat at home lapping it all up. All four of them feature renowned Muslim hate preachers who spout evil promoting murder, jihad and other violence, homophobia as well as anti Christian and Jewish views. The not so relevantly named ‘Peace TV’ is co owned by Zakir Naik, a Muslim extremist cleric who calls for the murder of gays and jihad on a regular basis. He is currently banned from entering the UK because of his radical views.

Time and time again, these so called religious scholars show the Muslims claim of being ‘The Religion Of Peace’ for the taqiyya that it really is. If those Islamic preachers who teach this hate cant behave civilly and rational. What chance is there that their disciples will act in any other way than that of their peers. Personally i dislike even calling Islam a religion because that’s insulting  to the followers of other peaceful faiths. Its nothing more than an evil cult.

Preachers of hate who spread their violent word on British TV channels

Muslim fundamentalists have used British television channels to preach in favour of violent crime and killing “apostates”.

Mohammed Farooq Nizami told NOOR TV that "Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty"
Mohammed Farooq Nizami told NOOR TV that “Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty”
Zakir Naik said on the "Dare to Ask" program on Peace TV that if a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam, the death penalty should be applied
Zakir Naik said on the “Dare to Ask” program on Peace TV that if a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam, the death penalty should be applied

The communications watchdog, Ofcom, has made a series of rulings against channels which allowed “inflammatory” material to be broadcast in breach of rules which forbid extreme opinions gaining a platform on British television.

The cases, disclosed today, include examples of an imam telling viewers that those who disrespect the prophet Mohammed should be killed, and another broadcaster saying homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

The stations were found to have committed serious breaches of the broadcasting code by allowing the extreme opinions to be aired unchallenged.

Last night experts warned that the extent and seriousness of the broadcasting breaches raises questions over whether extreme Muslim speakers who were previously confined to small audiences in mosques are able to reach thousands more people by broadcasting intolerant teachings on television.

Although the channels have tiny audiences compared to the mainstream, they are targeted at Muslim communities, including people of Pakistani background, with some of the content being broadcast in Urdu and other languages.

The cases identified by Ofcom include:

* An Islamic scholar who told viewers: “It is your duty … to kill those who insult Prophet Mohammed.”

* A preacher banned from coming to Britain who used the channel – which he co-owns – to say anyone who left Islam should be put to death.

* A phone-in presenter who advocated “eliminating” anyone who disrespected Mohammed.

In some cases the channels had also breached a rule which states that they must keep recordings of all their output, raising the possibility that other inflammatory material has been broadcast but cannot be traced.

With the exception of one radio broadcaster, the channels ruled against by Ofcom are broadcast on the satellite provider Sky. It has no legal responsibility for what is broadcast on the channels it carries. It is up to the stations themselves to make sure they meet Ofcom’s standards and they can be fined or taken off the air if they do not.

The disclosure of the rulings by the broadcasting regulator comes despite a report in 2010 which warned that extremist material was being broadcast.

Tala Rajab, the researcher who wrote the report for Quilliam, the anti-extremist think-tank, said the fresh findings by Ofcom raised serious questions over the regulation of broadcast material.

“Some of these recent incidents have been quite shocking,” he said.

“If this had happened in a mosque the police would be right in pursuing a criminal investigation. But because they are being broadcast on television channels for some reason there seems to be little appetite for looking into these extreme messages.

“If these kind of comments were made against black people, for example, you can imagine a channel being shut down overnight, particularly if they had incited violence against a minority.”

The 2010 report found that the Islam Channel, Britain’s largest Islamic broadcaster, had continued to ignore Ofcom rules about impartiality and allowed controversial viewpoints to be aired despite a fine and other sanctions being imposed. It is not among the subjects of the five Ofcom rulings disclosed today.

In December a Leeds radio station, Radio Asian Fever, was fined £4,000 for breaching broadcasting rules in programmes involving a presenter called “Sister Ruby Ramadan”.

She told listeners that homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

“If there are two such persons among you, that do this evil, the shameful act, what do you have to do? Torture them; punish them; beat them and give them mental torture,” said the presenter.

Jabbar Karim, the station’s managing director, said: “We are very embarrassed. This was a one-off incident which will never be repeated.”

Takbeer TV, based in Nottingham, has been found in breach of the code twice in 18 months for programmes which denigrated the minority Ahmadi Muslim sect. Founded in the 19th century its followers are considered by some mainstream Muslims to be misguided or even heretical.

Contributors to the most recent programmes investigated by Ofcom said Ahmadis had a “disease” and “monstrous” intentions.

Ofcom said Takbeer TV had subjected the sect’s followers to “abusive treatment” and that they would now consider an appropriate sanction such as a fine.

An Ofcom spokesman said: “The majority of Islamic channels comply with our rules. However, where we identify issues through our monitoring or complaints we investigate fully and take firm enforcement action.”

He said it was Ofcom’s duty to regulate licence holders rather than the responsibility of carriers such as Sky. However, carriers are free to decide which channels they offer, he added.

A Sky spokesman said: “Sky operates an open and regulated platform. This means any broadcaster with an appropriate Ofcom licence is free to seek distribution over the satellite platform.”

There are 14 Muslim TV free-to-air channels in Britain but their audiences are not measured by BARB, the source of viewing figures.

Takbeer TV failed to respond when asked to comment.

Preachers of hate on British TV: what they said that broke the broadcasting rules

Muslim fundamentalists have been found breaching the strict rules on what can be broadcast on the airwaves in Britain, by inciting violence and intolerance.

Abdul Qadir Jilani, left, told viewers Islamic texts authorised killing those who had left the faith

Abdul Qadir Jilani, left, told viewers Islamic texts authorised killing those who had left the faith

By David Barrett, Home Affairs Correspondent

9:00PM GMT 09 Feb 2013

Ofcom, the broadcasting regulator, has made a series of new rulings against minority channels, which are disclosed here for the first time.

The broadcasters and stations which broke the rules are:

Name: Dr Zakir Naik

Channel: Peace TV

Programme: Dare to Ask

Date: March 8, 2012

What was said: “One group of scholars, they say that if a Muslim, if he becomes a non-Muslim [inaudible] he should be put to death.

“There is another group of scholars who say that if a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam then he should be put to death.

“I tend to agree more with the second group of scholars, who say that a Muslim, if he becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam, that is the time this penalty is applied.”

What Ofcom ruled: “In Ofcom’s view it is potentially offensive for any service to broadcast comments suggesting that it is acceptable to apply a ‘penalty’ and kill any individual for renouncing their faith. Broadcasters must ensure that material which may cause offence is justified by the context.”

Dr Naik was banned from entering Britain in 2010 by Theresa May, the Home Secretary, after she ruled his presence was “not conducive to the public good”.

He had been due to give a series of lectures at arenas in Wembley and Sheffield. Mrs May said she was excluding him because his “numerous comments” were evidence of “unacceptable behaviour”.

The decision, later upheld by the High Court, was based on a sermon the Mumbai-based preacher had posted on the internet in 2006 which said “every Muslim should be a terrorist” and which went on: “Beware of Muslims saying Osama bin Laden is right or wrong. I reject them … we don’t know. But if you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him.”

However Dr Naik is the co-owner of Peace TV, a channel which is funded by a charity called the Islamic Research Foundation International.

In March last year he said in a programme he was presenting that it was appropriate to crucify, dismember or exile those who “wage war against Allah” under sharia law.

He also said it was correct to kill former Muslims who “propagate his new faith against Islam”.

Ofcom ruled Dr Naik’s show breached part of the code which states that offensive comments should be “justified by the context”.

A spokesman for PeaceTV said:”We are disappointed by Ofcom’s ruling, especially when the programme in question is an exposition of certain teachings from the Quran, which we felt were justified by the context, and didn’t attract a single complaint from a viewer.

“That said, we take our responsibilities extremely seriously and the programme will not be broadcast again.”

Name: Muhammad Farooq Nizami

Channel: Noor TV

Programme: Paigham-e-Mustafa (“Message of Mustafa”)

Date: May 3, 2012

What was said: “There is absolutely no doubt about it that the punishment for the person who shows disrespect for the Prophet is death. No one disagrees about this.

“Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty. In the whole world, there should be slaves of Mustafa [Muhammad] everywhere, and disrespectful people should be eliminated.

“One has to choose one’s own method. Our way is the peaceful way but when someone crosses the limits, faith-base emotions are instigated.”

What Ofcom ruled: “The breaches in this case … are regarded by Ofcom as serious breaches of the code.

“Ofcom is very concerned that Al Ehya [Noor TV’s parent company] still does not appear to recognise the very serious issues raised by the broadcast of Mr Nizami’s comments.”

In its ruling, Ofcom highlighted the Danish cartoon case from 2005, in which death threats were made after a newspaper published 12 images of Mohammed, and the murder of Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh in 2004 after his film Submission was condemned by Islamic clerics.

Ofcom told Noor TV’s owners in December that it is considering imposing a fine.

A Noor TV spokesman said: “We have appointed some new directors and implemented a whole range of new training, including having the Ofcom rules translated into Urdu.”

Al Ehya Digital Television Limited, the owner of Noor TV, said Ofcom was taking a “prejudiced view” of the programme.

Noor TV is also shown across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. In 2011, the channel was fined £75,000 by Ofcom for a number of breaches of the code, including soliciting £1,000 donations in exchange for prayers which it said would improve health and good fortune.

Dr Mohammed Iqbal, a pharmacist from Nottingham who is a director of Noor TV, said: “We are trying to get our house in order. We are sending out messages of peace. Anything else is unacceptable to anybody.”

Name: Abdul Qadir Jilani

Channel: DM Digital

Programme: Rehmatul Lil Alameen (“Mercy unto the Worlds”)

Date: October 9, 2011

What was said: “The matter of insulting the prophet does not fall in the category of terrorism.

“Those who cannot kill such men have no faith.

“It is your duty, the duty of those who recite the holy verse, to kill those who insult Prophet Mohammed.

“Under the guidance from Islamic texts it is evident that if a Muslim apostatises, then it is not right to wait for the authorised courts; anyone may kill him.

“An apostate deserves to be killed and any man may kill him.”

What Ofcom ruled: “The statements … did amount to direct calls to action and were likely to incite or encourage crime or to lead to disorder.”

Mr Jilani is an imam at the Dar-ul-Uloom mosque in Walthamstow having studied in Pakistan, where he was born, and Saudi Arabia.

Dr Liaqat Malik, 54, the chairman of DM Digital, accused Ofcom of bias towards ethnic minorities and said the comments were taken out of context.

“I think Ofcom interpreted his comments wrongly. He wasn’t saying people should kill. He was talking about Pakistan’s blasphemy law,” said Dr Malik.

“We wouldn’t allow anyone to use our TV channel to talk about killing like that. It’s not religious TV, it’s educational, community TV.

“There are cultural differences and I think Ofcom doesn’t understand that. Some of the Ofcom committee members should be picked from the Muslim community.”