Tag Archives: BRITAIN

Media Finally Realise Muslim Group CAGE Are Dodgy Terrorist Supporters

Mohammed Emwazi is 'extremely gentle', says British advocacy group
Mohammed Emwazi is ‘extremely gentle’, says British apologist for terrorism

 

The mainstream media are devoting plenty of space this weekend to articles about Muslim group Cage having only just realised they are not a nice and friendly human rights group who look out for law abiding Muslims interests. But infact a bunch of radical Islamists who support jihad. The Muslims whose human rights they actually are interested in, just so happen to be the terrorist type. The absolute filth of humanity who have involved in the slaughter of innocent people.

Just a shame it has took them around a decade to realise that. A massive clue should of been that until recently the group was called Caged Prisoners and was founded by terrorist and ex gitmo detainee Moazzem Begg. A quick look on their website would confirm any suspicions one may have to their position.

Until recently their most infamous client and ‘victim of western oppression’  was hate preacher Abu Qatada. The Muslim cleric was fighting deportation from the UK to be tried for murder from terror attacks he was allegedly involved with. Cage threw their support behind Qatada and his communist lawyer Gareth Pierce as they drained the taxpayer funded legal aid pot to fight his extradition in court using EU human rights violations.

Cage thrust itself into the spotlight last week and open for scrutiny by revealing that they had been in contact for a number of years with the ISIS savage known as ‘Jihadi John’ who had been outed as Mohammed Emwazi.

At a press conference on Thursday,  Asim Qureshi, research director at Cage revealed Emwazi, 26, had contacted Cage for help after he was detained by MI5 over a trip to Tanzania amid allegations he was trying to join the terrorist group al-Shabaab, an al-Qaeda affiliate.   Mr Qureshi provoked outrage in describing Emwazi as “the most humble young person that I ever knew”, calling him “extremely kind” and “extremely gentle” and blaming his radicalisation on the British authorities.

Cage are just out and out apologists for terrorism. Humble, kind and gentle are three words that nobody in the right mind would say about the terrorist known as ‘Jihadi John’.  Barbaric, hate filled and savage spring into my mind to describe him. Not because of the government stopping him in Tanzania or anything else they said or did. Because from whats being reported now they correct in doing so. He was already part of a terror network back then regardless of any of the sympathy seeking story Cage Prisoners are trying to make people believe.

Cageprisoners’ basic narrative is that “the war on terror” is an excuse for America and Britain to terrorise the Islamic world. Portraying Muslims as the victims and those who are accused of Jihadist terrorism are innocent proof of the evil power of the US / UK secret Zionist backed state. From this world view, it is a relatively short step to believe that the entire “war on terror” charade is founded upon a lie, perpetrated by the same secret state that now exploits it for its own evil purpose.

On a side note, isn’t it great to know Mr Qureshi lives in a £500,000 house in Surrey. Being an apologist for murder and terrorism must pay very well

Afghan Asylum Seeker Jailed For Grooming 13 Year Old From Stoke On Trent

Muslim Asif Ghanbari entered the UK illegally in the back of a lorry. Once here he applied for asylum claiming to be escaping fighting in his native Afghanistan. Presumably this was granted as he had started a training course to become an interpretor for the British Army. A life changing opportunity which you think he would make the most of given he shouldn’t of even been in the country.?  No he showed his gratitude by grooming a 13 year old girl online before hooking up with her numerous times for sex. The sexual predator despite knowing the girls age even managed to get her pregnant which he made he abort. Animals like Ghanbari  should face automatic deportation on release regardless if they have claimed asylum. No appeals, no human rights laws, no nothing other than the first plane out of here

COURT: Asif Ghanbari has been put on the sex offenders' register
COURT: Asif Ghanbari has been put on the sex offenders’ register
former asylum seeker training to be an interpreter for the British Army has been jailed after meeting a Potteries schoolgirl on Facebook and getting her pregnant.
former asylum seeker training to be an interpreter for the British Army has been jailed after meeting a Potteries schoolgirl on Facebook and getting her pregnant.

An Afghan teenager and former asylum seeker training to be an interpreter for the British Army has been jailed after meeting a Potteries schoolgirl on Facebook and getting her pregnant.

Asif Ghanbari was dumped at Stafford Services after coming to the UK on the back of a lorry in 2008 and started a new life in Stoke-on-Trent.

The 19-year-old then used a false name – Jack Nelson – to meet a 13-year-old girl on Facebook.

He took her on dates in Hanley and Newcastle, had sex with her 17 times and got her pregnant – when she was 14 – before she had an abortion.

Now seeker Ghanbari, of Hanley, has been locked up for 32 months for his crimes.

Children’s charities today condemned Ghanbari’s actions.

NSPCC official Sandra McNair said: “This sad case highlights, once again, the urgent need to educate young people on how to keep safe online, so they can be protected from grooming and exploitation. Peer-to-peer abuse is a growing concern and highlights the vital need to educate young people about healthy and respectful relationships.”

Asif fled war-torn Helmand Province to start a new life – and ended up having under-age sex with a Potteries schoolgirl.

The one-time illegal immigrant posed under the false name of Jack Nelson to groom the then 13-year-old girl on Facebook because he wanted a girlfriend.

The 19-year-old took the youngster – who cannot be named – on dates to Newcastle and Hanley’s Central Forest Park before their relationship blossomed and she went to his Hanley home.

They had regular sex and the girl fell pregnant at 14.

Now Ghanbari – who has been training with the British Army with a view to working as an interpreter for future visits to Afghanistan – has been sentenced to 32 months in a young offenders’ institution.

Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard the pair met on Facebook.

Prosecutor Rupert Jones said: “He used the name Jack Nelson. A couple of weeks after making contact he suggested they meet. They met in Hanley Forest Park and he arrived in his car. At the time the victim was aged 14. She told the defendant her age.

“The defendant arranged to meet her again in Newcastle. He kissed her. Eventually he took her to his home and into his bedroom. They had sexual intercourse without contraception. They had intercourse on a number of other occasions.”

The court heard the girl had an abortion after she became pregnant. Ghanbari was arrested and told police he had consensual sex with the girl about 17 times.

Ghanbari, of Leek Road, Hanley, pleaded guilty to meeting a child following sexual grooming and sexual activity with a child.

The court heard Afghanistan-born Ghanbari was trafficked to the UK in 2008 on the back of a lorry. He has no knowledge of what has happened to his family in Helmand Province.

Catherine O’Reilly, mitigating, said: “He was reaching out for some comfort, a relationship, some kind of family life. He adopted the name because it was a western name. He wanted a girlfriend.

“He has made a massive mistake, a massive error of judgement.”

Miss O’Reilly said Ghanbari is intelligent and has been recruited as an Army interpreter. She asked Judge David Fletcher to step back from passing an immediate custodial sentence.

But the judge sentenced Ghanbari to 32 months in a young offenders’ institution and placed him on the sex offenders’ register for life.

Judge Fletcher said: “It could not be said that you were under any misconception about the age of that woman. Her details were on the Facebook site. On the first occasion she made clear to you she was the age she was. She was between 13 and 14. You admitted you had unprotected sexual intercourse with her, you say on 17 occasions.”

 

Death Threats Issued To New UK Anti-Sharia Campaign Group

A new campaign group against sharia law being implemented in Britain and to highlight the threat of Islamism in our society has received death threats on its launch. Followers of ‘the religion of peace’ once again show how peaceful Islam really is with the usual threats of violence and death to anybody who speaks out against them. If Islam was a person it would be a spoilt child who has a tantrum everytime they cant have their own way and bullies smaller children in the school playground.

 shariah_150x150_p1

Death threats issued as Sharia Watch launches in London

24 April 2014, 13:56  

A new group has been launched at the House of Lords to campaign for greater recognition of the threat posed by Islamic Sharia law. Sharia Watch UK says it wants to highlight the impact of Islamism in Britain and campaign against the prevalence of Sharia tribunals, particularly where it relates to women’s rights. VoR’s Tim Ecott spoke to Anne Marie Waters, spokesperson for Sharia Watch, and to Aina Khan, a solicitor in London who specialises in applying Sharia law within the English legal system.

“Our aim is quite simply to tell the truth,” says Waters. “There is a large lack of knowledge of what Sharia Law actually stands for, what it does to women, how it treats women. And our aim is simply to tell the public – warts and all – what Sharia is: its views of women, its views of free speech, its threat to democracy, how it is operating in Britain, the organisations behind it and what their agendas are, and, indeed, the public support that such organisations receive from public figures.

Where do you see the threat coming from?

“It’s acceptance of it by the mainstream, that is a huge issue. If you look at what Sharia says about women, for example, it essentially advocates the slavery of women. If you strip it away and bear it down, that’s what it is, it’s the slavery of women, it’s the ownership of women. It degrades and humiliates women and yet it is accepted by the mainstream and supported by mainstream figures.”

You say it’s accepted; Britain still applies the rule of British Law, where do you see Sharia law coming in or being accepted in a way that makes you fearful?

“We have a network of Sharia councils and tribunals which are dealing increasingly with matters of family law, such as divorce, child custody, but also with domestic violence, which is a criminal matter. No private tribunal or council has any right, any legal right, to adjudicate on criminal matters and yet they are doing it without a murmur of protest from the Establishment.

“We’re consistently told that the English law is there for everyone who needs it. This is a non-answer, a non-response. It’s cowardly.

“”What they’re essentially saying is that women who are brutalised often don’t speak English, often are newcomers to this country. The government’s response is that those women should somehow find the confidence and courage to stand up and demand rights they don’t even know they have.”

You believe there are a number of women in Britain – Muslim women -who you think are facing Sharia justice in some kind of community set-up?

“We know it’s happening. The Islamic Sharia Council’s quite open about this, as is the Muslim Arbitration Tribunal. So we know it happens.

“In research for Baroness Cox’s [Arbitration and Mediation Services (Equality)] Bill, for example – the bill she is introducing into the {House of] Lords to bring these places into line with human rights laws, many women who have been through them were interviewed. It was confirmed to us, for example, that Muslim women need a witness for every testimony she gives, because a woman’s word is worth half of a man’s. This is even confirmed by, for example, Aina Khan, who is a pro-Sharia advocate and a lawyer, so we don’t suspect it’s going on, we know it’s going on.”

Presumably you oppose the Law Society’s recent decision to issue guidance to British lawyers who are asked to draw up Wills according to Sharia Law?

“Absolutely! It’s the same message, it’s the sanitising of Sharia. It creates in the public mind an impression that there’s nothing wrong with Sharia, that it’s not misogynistic. It sanitises Sharia. It makes people think, ‘well if the Law Society is issuing guidance on it, it can’t be that bad’.”

You feel the authorities, the Establishment are turning a blind eye – why would they do that?

“There are many reasons…. fear is chief among them. I think they’re afraid of being accused of Islamophobia, for example. Individuals are afraid of violence. I get death threats.”

You personally have had death threats?

“Yes. I get threats into my e-mail inbox on a regular basis. For example, I was due to give a speech in a university in East London. A man came in with a camera, filmed everyone there and said he knew who we were and he would track us down if we said anything negative about the Prophet. The government is afraid of upsetting the Islamist establishment.”

Do you have any notable figures or MPs who are behind Sharia Watch?

“I am not a one-woman band. I do not have any specific MPs, but we are very new, we are only launching today and we hope to gain support as we go along.

Are you prepared for an outcry among those Muslims and non-Muslims who say Britain is a multi-faith, multi-ethnic society, the setting-up of Sharia Watch is going to be labelled at best racist?

“I’m used to it. This has got nothing to do with race. Islam is not a race. Sharia is not a race. This is a civil rights issue, a human rights issue, a democracy issue, a freedom-of-speech issue. We’re not against anyone, we are defending gender equality, defending freedom of speech. If that brings us into conflict with Sharia, then so be it.”

VoR’s Tim Ecott also spoke to Aina Khan, head of the Islamic department at Duncan Lewis, solicitors.

Download podcast

What do you make of the charges made by Sharia Watch that Muslim women in this country are facing discrimination because in their words, Sharia Law values women less than men?

“I am not able to agree with that at all because the Sharia that I practise under English law, which I provide solutions under for my clients, works extremely well in favour of women, particularly those who can’t be helped by English law.

“For example, a woman who believes she is married under English law, but only had a Muslim ceremony in the UK – that marriage is not recognised under English law unless it is registered. If she didn’t know that that wasn’t a valid marriage she stands to lose all her matrimonial rights to property and a share of the family assets. English law will do nothing because she will be classed as a girlfriend or co-habitee, and co-habitees don’t have any rights under English law.

“Sharia law actually gives that woman and others like her great security by giving her the Islamic financial settlement that is in every Muslim marriage. So I take those cases to court under English contract law. If a woman has been promised a lump sum by her husband and then he divorces her, it’s only Islamic law that will help her get back to the position she was in before the marriage.”

That seems to imply that you see a way of allowing Sharia to operate in parallel with the official English legal system.

“I would never say that it’s in parallel – it’s always under the English legal system. Over a century ago, the Jewish communities started the beth din (Rabbinical court of Judaism) in this country and indeed around the world, and they’ve been happily providing those solutions for the Jewish community under English law. What on earth is wrong with other communities doing the same?”

If any community’s laws coincide with English law in this country, all well and good. But what about the assertion that under Sharia law, women’s rights as not as forceful or as equal as they would be under English law?

“In certain situations that can happen because Sharia law was brought into being 1,400 years ago, and we had laws in England even 100 years ago that were discriminatory. Women couldn’t own property – Islamic law gave women the right to own property 1,400 years ago.

“My view is Sharia is not set in stone, it should move with the times and also the country it finds itself in. As long as it’s not producing inequalities in society, Sharia law can accommodate all levels of debate.”

And you don’t believe it puts women in an inferior position?

“It doesn’t if we apply it correctly under English law. It will put women in an inferior position if you apply it in a country where there is no progression since 1,400 years ago – that’s where we have issues.”

Next week there are to be protests against the Law Society because the Law Society has issued guidance to British solicitors about how to advise clients who come with a Sharia dispute or contention.

“This was a non-story that was blown out of proportion. The law has not changed in any way. There are certain mischievous elements that want to create discord in our society, and it’s the same groups again and again who use an emotive word – Sharia.

“The Law Society did a simple thing – they told solicitors what the guidance would be if they wanted to make a Will according to Islamic law. It doesn’t change the law in any way regarding Wills, you’re still free to give all your money to the local dogs’ home. The only thing Islamic law would do is not allow that – it says you can only give one third away, the rest has to go to your family in certain set shares.”

For many, Sharia represents a different system that in some parts of the world allows for the amputation of hands, the stoning of unfaithful women – you can see why that worries people.

“Absolutely, and it’s the Muslim community’s duty to explain how one system can apply different ways of law to different situations. Criminal law we won’t accept in the UK, family law people want to accept in the UK.

“It’s not about an alien system, which many people see. There are countless thousands of Muslim converts in the UK alone who are born in Britain – they may be African-Caribbean, Irish, Scottish… What are you going to do about those who are voluntarily choosing Islam as a faith? You can’t just get emotive, you have to increase your knowledge and understand what attracts them to that faith, and then we can have a dialogue.”

Do you think it’s a malicious movement where people are projecting a fear of all things Islamic, and are using Sharia as an example of something they fear which may eventually be so popular it will demand official recognition, such as Sharia law equals English law?

“I can understand where the fear comes from. I would probably find it frightening if I didn’t understand it. It also plays into the hands of extremism, and people like the English Defence League, and other right-wing groups. It’s important to stay calm because we don’t want to see victimisation of any one community.”

 

Read more: http://voiceofrussia.com/uk/news/2014_04_24/Death-threats-issued-as-Sharia-Watch-launches-in-London-6217/

Attempts To Change GCSE Exam Dates To Appease Muslim Students

Another Muslim related controversy within the British schooling system. We’ve had halal food forced on many pupils, many controversial Muslim free schools set up enforcing sex segregation and compulsory headscarf wearing for non Muslim staff, then only a matter of weeks ago the attempted takeover of state schools by Muslim extremists. Now we have attempts to appease Muslims by changing the dates of GCSEs to avoid clashes with Ramadam or give Muslims extra points because they were fasting.

I had to double check the date to make sure it wasn’t an April fools day joke. As much as a joke it seems, its no wind up. Only the latest bit of pandering to Muslims as authorities continue to bend over for Muslims.

Bid to bring forward GCSEs so Muslim pupils aren’t fasting for Ramadan while they take their exams

  • Efforts to ‘minimise impact’ will be debated at ATL conference this month
  • Exam watchdog Ofqual has met with Muslim groups to discuss the issue
  • Suggestions include holding exams in morning when pupils are less hungry

GCSE and A-level examinations could be brought forward for  hundreds of thousands of pupils to avoid a clash with Ramadan under controversial proposals.

Teachers and lecturers in England and Wales are pushing for the summer exam timetable to be altered to help Muslim students who will be fasting when they sit papers.School exam boards and universities are considering the radical shake-up from 2016, when the religious period of Ramadan clashes with the exam season.

Fast: A girl reads from the Koran on the last Friday of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan (file photo). Muslims across the world abstain from eating and drinking from sunrise to sunset during the period

Fast: A girl reads from the Koran on the last Friday of the Islamic holy month of Ramadan (file photo). Muslims across the world abstain from eating and drinking from sunrise to sunset during the period

One option is to hold some exams earlier within the usual May-June exam season. Another is for fasting Muslim students to be eligible for extra marks under ‘special consideration’ rules if they believe their performance has been affected.

The holy period in the Islamic calendar, which requires Muslims to fast during daylight hours, starts to fall earlier and earlier in the summer from next year, progressively clashing with the exam season in June. The clash also coincides with Michael Gove’s return to O-level style exams, which are taken at the end of the two-year course rather than at intervals throughout it – making the summer exams the only chance to do well.

This month, the Association of Teachers and Lecturers Union (ATL) conference will debate how to ‘minimise the impact’ on Muslim pupils.

Barry Lingard, who is on the ATL executive committee, said: ‘The consequences are quite huge, particularly with the return to three-hour exams at the end of the course in the summer.

If some of the big vital exams like English and maths could be rescheduled for before Ramadan kicks in, that would certainly be supported by the majority of teachers.’

Ofqual, the exam watchdog, and the Joint Council for Qualifications, which represents the main three exam boards, have met with Muslim groups to discuss the issue.

Changes: Suggestions including holding exams in the mornings making it easier for pupils to concentrate

Changes: Suggestions including holding exams in the mornings making it easier for pupils to concentrateAnother suggestion is to run exams in the morning, when pupils are less likely to be hungry and tired, rather than the afternoon.

The government-funded Equality Challenge Unit, which advises higher education, said exam time-tables should be overhauled.

‘Institutions should be prepared to consider significant adjustments to their exam schedules and think creatively about assessment methods in order to eliminate disadvantage to particular groups,’ it said.

Muslim undergraduates at university are also affected by the clash of dates. At the University of East Anglia in Norwich, they have already been told: ‘Where a student feels that fasting has affected their performance, this should be submitted as an extenuating circumstance.’

But Chris McGovern, a former head teacher and spokesman for the Campaign for Real Education, said children had been coping with exams for decades in many different circumstances.

‘Where there is scope for some flexibility the exam boards should exercise it, but I don’t think it is realistic for a board to rearrange their timetable to fit in with a minority religion, or any religion for that matter,’ he said.

‘If you run exams in the morning because of this, you may be disadvantaging a non-Muslim pupil who then has two exams in one day rather than one.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2597832/Bid-bring-forward-GCSEs-Muslim-pupils-arent-fasting-Ramadan-exams.html#ixzz2yCDCuAC4

UK’s First Prosecution For Female Genital Mutilation

Not before time, Britain has finally prosecuted Muslim individuals for the barbaric act of female genital mutilation. Despite being illegal in the UK since 1985 and as many as 66,000 victims of FGM living here. Amazingly until now there has been no prosecutions for this disgusting Islamic practice.

FGM is violence against women and we must eradicate this harmful and unacceptable practice from our infidel society.  When it is done on girls which most FGM is, then it is a form of child abuse with many long-term consequences both physical and psychological. Muslim parents who arrange for their daughters privates to be butchered in the name of Islam should be hauled before the court and the child taken into care by social services. There should be no difference in law between them and an evil parent who beats their child black and blue.

Lets hope this first case opens the floodgates to a whole load more of prosecutions against those involved in the savage FGM of girls.

Britain prosecutes first female genital mutilation case

AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE

Published — Friday 21 March 2014

Last update 21 March 2014 6:11 pm

LONDON: A London doctor and another man have become the first people to be charged in Britain over female genital mutilation, state prosecutors announced on Friday.
Dr. Dhanuson Dharmasena, 31, is accused of re-performing an FGM procedure on a woman who gave birth at his hospital in November 2012 following damage caused by labor.
Another man, Hasan Mohamed, 40, is accused of intentionally encouraging an offense of FGM, and of aiding, abetting, counselling or procuring Dharmasena to commit the offense.
It was not immediately clear what Mohamed’s relationship to the victim was, but he is not a health care professional.
“It was alleged that following a patient giving birth in November 2012, a doctor at the Whittington Hospital, in London, repaired FGM that had previously been performed on the patient, allegedly carrying out FGM himself,” said Alison Saunders, director of public prosecutions.
“Having carefully considered all the available evidence, I have determined there is sufficient evidence and it would be in the public interest to prosecute Dr. Dhanuson Dharmasena.”
Both Dharmasena, from Essex, east of London, and Mohamed, from north London, will appear at Westminster Magistrates’ Court on April 15.
Some 100 to 140 million girls and women globally are thought to have undergone FGM, which ranges from removal of the clitoris to more widespread mutilation, and can lead to infection and long-term severe pain.
FGM has been illegal in Britain since 1985 but no-one has ever been prosecuted.
There have been increasing calls on police and the government to act, and last month ministers introduced a new requirement on British hospitals to keep a record of patients who have been subjected to FGM.
The latest Department of Health figures from 2007 suggest that 66,000 women in England and Wales are living with the consequences of FGM, and a further 23,000 girls under the age of 15 are at risk every year.
FGM was first made illegal in Britain under a 1985 law, which was extended in 2003 to make it an offense for British nationals or permanent residents to carry out FGM abroad or seek FGM abroad, even where it is legal.
The maximum penalty is 14 years in jail.

Source

Islamist Stealth Jihad To Take Over British State Schools Exposed

The National Secular Society have exposed plans by Islamic extremists to seize control of British state schools using stealth jihad tactics. Salafists/Wahabis plan to turn them into Muslim only schools by first complaining about non Muslim activities such as mixed lessons and Christian teachings corrupting the children. Before installing their Islamic extremists into the governing body of the schools and sending anonymous letters to the council to get the schools poor performance investigated allowing the planted governors to take control.

Tactics like this are not only being employed in schools but all society. Local councils,prominent civil service jobs such as health, police, housing, welfare where they will be able to sway influence and public funding in favour of Muslims. Tried and tested methods right out of the Muslim Brotherhood’s plans for Islamization of the west and world domination.

Plans by Islamist extremists to take over state schools exposed

Posted: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 11:09

Plans by Islamist extremists to take over state schools exposed

The Sunday Times this week reported an alleged plot by Islamist fundamentalists in Birmingham to take over state schools and use them as centres of “Islamic education.”

The supposed conspiracy is under investigation by Birmingham City Council, while the Sunday Times has obtained a copy of anonymous documents that detail a strategy to destabilise poorly-performing schools before moving in to transform them into academies and free schools with an Islamic ethos.

It is not known whether the council is aware of who has written the documents, but the Sunday Times speculates that they are the work of “disaffected parents” belonging to the Salafist branch of Islam, regarded by many as the most extreme and fundamentalist.

The Sunday Times has already revealed that Park View Academy in Birmingham is being investigated by the Department for Education for allegedly side-lining non-Muslim staff and trying to teach Islamic studies, despite not being a “faith-based” school.

The paper reports that the documents it has uncovered suggest that the strategy, called Operation Trojan Horse, should be used in Bradford and Manchester as well as Birmingham. The authors of the strategy argue “We have an obligation to our children to fulfill our roles and ensure these schools are run on Islamic principles.”

The Sunday Times reports that they strategy’s first step is to:

“identify poor-performing state schools in Muslim areas; then Salafist parents in each school are encouraged to complain that teachers are ‘corrupting children with sex education, teaching about homosexuals, making their children say Christian prayers and mixed swimming and sports’.

“The next steps are to ‘parachute in’ Muslim governors ‘to drip-feed our ideal for a Muslim school’ and stir up staff to urge the council to investigate. The strategy stresses the importance of having an ‘English face among the staff group to make it more believable’.

“Finally, anonymous letters are to be circulated to MPs, press and ministers. ‘All these things will work towards wearing the head down, removing their resolve and weakening their mindset so they eventually give up.'”

Birmingham schools named as targets in the document include Regents Park, where the head teacher resigned last year over questions about exam results (despite being given an “outstanding” Ofsted report). Others are Adderley Primary School and Saltley School, a specialist science college where the head, Balwant Bains, resigned last year. Bains quit after an Ofsted report concluded that he had a “dysfunctional” relationship with the governors.

Ahson Mohammed, the interim head teacher at Saltley, was appointed in November after Bains’s resignation.

The Sunday Times says Mohammed categorically denied any suggestion that Bains resigned as a result of pressure from Muslim extremists.

Mohammed said the school has been closely monitored since Bains’s departure. “We have been under extensive scrutiny, both by Ofsted [and] by the local authority … where we are now is the school is stabilised, the school is functioning and has been named as being one of the top 100 [most improved] schools in the UK.”

Birmingham City Council is said to be “investigating allegations” and has passed information to West Midlands Police who are keeping the matter under review but not actively investigating.

Meanwhile, writing in the Daily Telegraph, Boris Johnson, the Mayor of London, says that the children of extremist Muslim parents are in danger of becoming radicalised. He asserts this is a form of child abuse and that the social services should have the power to take such children into care.

He says that as a society we have become “squeamish” about intervening in the cultural norms of other communities, even when they are antisocial or dangerous.

“We need to be less phobic of intrusion into the ways of minority groups and less nervous of passing judgment on other cultures. We can have a great, glorious, polychromatic society, but we must be firm to the point of ruthlessness in opposing behaviour that undermines our values,” wrote Mr Johnson.

Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society, said: “Boris Johnson is right. We are permitting a whole generation of young Muslims to be exposed to fanatical and extremely dangerous ideas, not only at home but in schools and the hundreds of unregulated brainwashing centres called madrassas. The extremists are determined and well-organised and they are finding more and more ways to propagate their ideas through exploiting and abusing the freedom of our liberal and tolerant society.”

Mr Sanderson said the Government seemed paralysed and incapable of even considering the risks of permitting the further proliferation of “faith schools” – particularly under the academy and free school model which is so easily exploited. “Such reluctance will ultimately pose a threat to the unity of the UK” said Mr Sanderson.

http://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2014/03/plans-by-islamist-extremists-to-take-over-state-schools-exposed

Women Only Muslim Event 20th December Called The Attack On Gender Segregation

H/T: The Islamic Far Right In Britain

Pretty ironic that this Fridays event at the Waterlilly in London called “The Attack On Gender Segregation In Islam” is for women only. Wouldn’t that be as sexist as a male only event? The gender segregation issue isn’t about sexism against women. Because a male who may wish to sit with his wife can’t exactly the same as if it was the other way round. Its about Muslim ways being pushed on students in a British university. Basically the extremist nutjobs dictating what is and isn’t permissible in a nation that promotes freedom of choice.

Wannabe Jihadist Brothers From Bradford Admit Having Terrorist Material

Islamic extremist brothers Muhammed Saeed Ahmed, 21, and Muhammed Naeem Ahmed,20 from Bradford, West Yorkshire are the latest British born Muslim trainee terrorist to appear before the courts here in the UK. Muhammed and Muhammed were trying to emulate the worlds first Muslim terrorist who they were both named after. The false prophet of Islam Muhammed inventor of jihad and the cause of death for millions on innocent people.

Further proof if it was ever needed that the biggest terror threat to the UK is not from Muslims based abroad, but from those Muslims already here and living amongst us. Incited by the religious clerics and guest speakers that appear at Mosques up and down the country. Or beamed into the homes of Muslims to watch, on one of the many extremist Muslim TV stations available. 

Bradford brothers admit charges of having terrorist material

10:00am Tuesday 26th November 2013 in News

Muhammed Saeed Ahmed (left) and Muhammed Naeem AhmedMuhammed Saeed Ahmed (left) and Muhammed Naeem Ahmed

Two Bradford brothers have admitted having terrorist material, including documents such as The Al Qaeda Manual and 44 Ways of Supporting Jihad.

Muhammed Saeed Ahmed, 21, and Muhammed Naeem Ahmed, 20, pleaded guilty to 11 counts between them of collecting or possessing information likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism when they appeared at the Old Bailey today.

Muhammed Saeed Ahmed admitted ten of the charges and Muhammed Naeem Ahmed six of them.

The brothers, of Little Horton, but whose full address cannot be reported for legal reasons, deny a charge of conspiring together and with others to attend a place used for terrorist training.

They are due to face trial on that count tomorrow.

The pair were arrested in March last year in a raid at their home by officers in the North East Counter Terrorism Unit and initially charged with possession of terrorist material.

The extra charge relating to the terror training camp was laid against them earlier this year with the approval of the Attorney General Dominic Grieve after a Government agency consented to certain material being released.

The Crown’s case is that that the brothers were planning to imminently attend a training camp.

Judge Gerald Gordon extended the brother’s bail until tomorrow’s trial.

The case continues.

http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/NEWS/10833568.Bradford_brothers_admit_charges_of_having_terrorist_material/

Bishop fears sharia bonds pave way for more Islamic law

Its bad enough communists and the far left aiding the Islamization of the UK.  Now dhimmi Dave is opening the doors for more sharia law.

Bishop fears sharia bonds pave way for more Islamic law

Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, the former bishop of Rochester, warns plans by David Cameron to issue a sharia-compliant bond could have “unforeseen consequences”

The Church of England is facing divisions over proposals to introduce a formal service for gay couples

Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, the former bishop of Rochester, said plans to introduce sharia-compliant bonds should be subject to a public debate Photo: GETTY IMAGES

By Edward Malnick, and John Bingham

9:00PM GMT 02 Nov 2013

David Cameron’s plans to issue sharia-compliant bonds open the way to Islamic law being enforced at the heart of government, a senior clergyman has warned.

Dr Michael Nazir-Ali, the former bishop of Rochester, said proposals to make Britain the first non-Muslim country to sell a bond that complies with sharia could trigger a series of “unforeseen consequences”.

He also voiced broader fears that Christianity was being increasingly excluded from the administration of law, after one of Britain’s most senior judges said members of the judiciary were “secular” figures serving a “multicultural community”.

Last week the Prime Minister set out plans for Britain to issue a sukuk, a form of debt that is in line with Islamic law, because it avoids the prohibited use of “riba”, or interest.

The bonds, which will be worth around £200 million, would pay a fixed return based on the profit generated by an underlying asset, such as government buildings.

Speaking at the World Islamic Economic Forum in London on Tuesday Mr Cameron said Britain should rival Dubai as one of the “great capitals of Islamic finance”.

The Prime Minister told senior officials and business leaders from Muslim countries it would be a “mistake” for Britain to turn away their money when “Islamic finance is growing 50 per cent faster than traditional banking”.

However, Dr Nazir-Ali, who holds dual British and Pakistani citizenship, said of the plans: “This means that the Government itself will be subject to sharia in its dealings on these bonds.

“At the moment the issue is pretty modest, but how much will it grow? There’s a lot of liquidity out there and it could grow pretty rapidly, and then you may face a situation where a major part of your financial system is governed by sharia-compliant considerations.”

He added: “Before we take these steps that could have unforeseen consequences we do need greater public discussion, greater explanation of what actually is being done and what it is we are letting ourselves in for.”

The bishop said that a public debate on the introduction of the bonds should include whether sharia judges should be allowed to adjudicate in disputes over government-backed investments.

“They must be taking advice already from sharia scholars to put together these products. Has there been any discussion that such advice can be taken and that such adjudication can be acceptable in terms of official policy?”

Even among Muslim scholars the principle of whether commercial interest was prohibited had been called into question, Dr Nazir-Ali said.

In 2008 Lord Williams of Oystermouth, the then archbishop of Canterbury, drew criticism for calling for “a constructive accommodation” with some aspects of Muslim law.

At the time Dr Nazir-Ali said it would be “simply impossible” to have sharia and British laws operating side by side.

Baroness Cox, an independent peer who has tabled a Private Member’s Bill in the Lords to rein in unofficial sharia courts and councils, said: “Any extension of quasi or parallel legal systems is utterly unacceptable.”

Plans for the first government bond compliant with sharia come after as the value of nearly 50 sukuks on the London Stock Exchange has reached £21  billion.

Britain’s most senior Muslim politician Baroness Warsi, the faith minister, who co-chairs the Government’s new Islamic finance task force, told The Telegraph faith “has a role to play in our growth agenda”.

Mr Cameron’s plans were welcomed by the Muslim Council of Britain, which described the announcement as a “very significant milestone for the community”.

Farooq Murad, the council’s secretary general, said: “The issuance of the sukuk would enable all of us to save money using safer instruments that comply with Islamic principles.

“Islamic pensions and investment funds would also be able to use the sukuk to balance their portfolios, leading to greater choice in the market.”

A Treasury source said the bond would comply with British laws “first and foremost”, adding that if investors did not think it was compliant with sharia law they simply “won’t invest in it”.

Dr Nazir-Ali also issued a rebuke to Sir James Munby, the President of the Family Division, who last week suggested that Christianity no longer influenced judicial decisions.

Sir James told family lawyers: “Although this country is part of the Christian West, and although it has an Established Church, which is Christian, we sit as secular judges serving a multi-cultural community of many faiths, sworn to do justice to all manner of people.”

Dr Nazir-Ali disputed whether Sir James’s view was the correct constitutional position. Members of the judiciary sit “as judges of the crown”, he said, adding that the coronation service and oath makes clear that the monarch is required to “uphold the laws of God”.

Dr Nazir-Ali said: “The Queen professes at the time of the coronation to uphold the laws of God and the true profession of the Gospel.

“So, whatever you may feel, you can’t say constitutionally that you are sitting as secular judges in a multi-faith society. He may feel that — that’s fine, it’s up to him to feel it — but that’s not the constitutional position as far as I see it.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/religion/10423016/Bishop-fears-sharia-bonds-pave-way-for-more-Islamic-law.html

Dangers Of UK based Terrorists As More Muslims Arrested For Terror Offences

The biggest terror threat on British soil is not from Islamic terrorists abroad but those already here in the UK. Those who are already living amongst us, plotting death and destruction from within.

religion_of_peace BRITISH BORN MUSLIM TERRORISTS ARE MAIN THREAT TO UK

On Thursday 31 October, Counter Terrorism officers arrested four people on suspicion of failing to disclose information which might be of assistance in securing the apprehension, prosecution or conviction of a person involved in an act of terrorism contrary to Section 38(b) Terrorism Act 2000. Two men – 31yrs [E] and 21yrs [F] – and a 25 [G] year old woman were arrested at two residential addresses in east London. They have been taken to a London police station where they remain in custody. A 25-year-old man [H] has been arrested at a residential address in Lancashire. He has been taken to a Lancashire police station where he remains in custody. A search has been carried out at an address in Lancashire.
The arrests were in connection with two men stopped under Schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act in Dover on Sunday 22 September, who have been charged in relation to the investigation: [A] Mohammed Hassin Nawaz, 29 (5.01.84), of Dirleton Road, Stratford, E15 and [B] Hamza Nawaz, 22 (27.09.90), of the same address, The men were arrested re-entering the UK with ammunition and terrorist material having been to a Muslim terrorist training camp.
 

Unfortunately Islamic terrorists and wannabe jihadists tend not to advertise it within earshot of the infidels. Neither do they all belong to a certain section of the Muslim community or all dress in a certain way. Foreign immigrants, Muslim students, 2nd generation Muslims born and bred in the UK, white British converts. Take your pick.
The only thing for certain is they are already living amongst us. Most will never have been in trouble,will have a job or go to college mixing with non-Muslims without giving any hint of their true extremist beliefs. That is what makes them all the more dangerous.

Thankfully on the whole our security services and counter terrorism units do a good job of keeping us safe by catching the bastards at the planning stages before they have chance to maim and kill in the name of the blood thirsty Allah. Unfortunately at some point, a group of jihadists are going to slip through that net and like Woolwich, will result in innocent people being killed.

It is quite disturbing to think that people living in the UK and amongst us, Muslims who came here supposedly to seek a better life are plotting to murder innocent people in the land that took them in and gave them a chance for a far better life than back home. That they can harbour that much hatred at people because they aren’t Muslim. With the only reason for doing so is the teachings of Islam, behaving savagely in the ways of the 1st Islamic terrorist Mohammed did 1500 years ago.

Government released figures show that in March 2013 there was 103 (non domestic/separatist related) terrorist prisoners held in the UK. Of them 100 out of 103 declared themselves as Muslims. A Muslim appeasing website called Loonwatch makes the absurd claim that 94% of terrorists are not Muslim. This 94% is often quoted on leftist / commie sites such as Huff Post. Now you can set the record straight that in the UKs case.  97% of terrorist ARE MUSLIM

Of the 2,419 persons arrested for terrorism-related offences since 11 September 2001, 1,198 (50%) self-declared their nationality as from Great Britain or of British dual nationality. Of the remaining persons arrested the most frequent self-declared nationalities were: Algeria (152 persons), Pakistan (125 persons), Iraq (115 persons), Afghanistan (74 persons), Iran (63 persons), India (56 persons), Turkey (45 persons) and Somalia (44 persons).

Of the 249 persons arrested for terrorism-related offences in 2012/13, 105 (42%) were charged,

Other notable British based Muslim terrorists to hit the headlines over the previous 12 months

14th October 2013 4 men unnamed London On 14th October 2013 BBC reported “Four men are being questioned over an alleged terror plot after they were arrested in a series of raids by armed police officers across London. The men – arrested at about 19:10 BST on Sunday in Whitechapel, Bayswater and Peckham – are being held on suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism.
10th June 2013 Omar Khan, 28, Mohammed Saud, 23, Jewel Uddin, 27, Zohaib Ahmed, 22, and Anzal Hussain, 25, EDL demo bombers Dewsbury On 30th June  five Muslim jailed for as much as 19 years after the men had travelled in two cars from Birmingham to Dewsbury on the afternoon of 30 June 2012  with an arsenal of weapons hidden in holdalls in the boot of one of the cars. Among the weapons were two shotguns, swords, knives, a nail bomb containing 458 pieces of shrapnel, and a partially-assembled pipe bomb. The nail bomb was an 18-inch rocket stuffed with shrapnel and was to be powered by explosives taken from at least two large fireworks.
26th April 2013 Irfan Naseer, Irfan Khalid, Ashik Alid,  and 8 others Birmingham plotters Eleven men have been jailed at Woolwich Crown Court, ending one of the largest ever counter-terrorism operations in the UK.
The investigation in Birmingham, known as Operation Pitsford, uncovered a cell of would-be suicide bombers who were trying to recruit others to their cause.
https://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/time-for-the-uk-to-wake-up-and-smell-the-coffee-to-the-real-extremists-as-another-11-british-muslim-terrorists-jailed/
18th April 2013 Zahid Iqbal, Mohammed Sharfaraz Ahmed, Umar Arshad, Syed Farhan Hussain Luton FOUR men who considered using a toy car to deliver a bomb in an al Qaeda-inspired attack in the UK have been jailed for a total of more than 30 years.Zahid Iqbal, Mohammed Sharfaraz Ahmed, Umar Arshad and Syed Farhan Hussain discussed setting off a home-made bomb at a Territorial Army centre in Luton, London’s Woolwich Crown Court heard.
The men, all from Luton, had admitted one count of engaging in conduct in preparation for acts of terrorism between January 1 2011 and April 25 2012 at a hearing on March 1.https://kafircrusaders.wordpress.com/2013/04/18/4-british-muslims-jailed-for-plotting-uk-terrorist-attack/
   
25th April 2013 Richard Dart, Mahmood, Alom London. Mr Justice Simon jailed 3 Muslims including white convert Richard Dart,saying the three held “radical Islamist beliefs” and showed they were “committed to acts of terrorism”.Dart, 30, of Ealing, west London, was jailed for six years; Mahmood, 22, from Northolt, west London for nine years and nine months, and Alom, 26, of Stratford, east London, for four years and six months    
10th December 2012 Ruksana Begum Stratford Following the arrest of Gurkanth Desai and Abdul Miah Ruksana had also been arrested but then released. However she was subsequently rearrested, the Daily Mail on 10th December 2012reporting, “Ruksana Begum, 22, who has a first-class degree in accountancy, had two editions of Al-Qaeda’s Inspire magazine on her phone, including articles such as ‘Targeting the populations of countries that are at war with the Muslims’.
10th October 2012 unamed man and woman Heathrow On 10th October 2012the BBC reported, “Two people have been arrested at Heathrow Airport on suspicion of committing terrorism offences, the Metropolitan Police have said. A man and a woman, both aged 26, were arrested at 20:30 BST on Tuesday after their flight landed at the airport. The pair was held on suspicion of the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism. These arrests are part of an investigation into travel to Syria in support of alleged terrorist activity. Scotland Yard said the pair had flown into the UK from Egypt.”

Opening peoples eyes to the threat that Political Islam poses to all our futures. Counter Jihad, Opposing the Islamization And Stealth Jihad of our infidel lands, Anti Rape-Jihad, Exposing Muslim Grooming Gangs, Reverse Dawah, Highlighting Pro Muslim Media Bias And Reverse Racism, Campaigning Against New Mosque Building, Against Inhumane Halal Slaughtered Food. Hater Of All Terrorism And Violence

%d bloggers like this: