Tag Archives: BNP

Far-Left Extremists UAF / SWP Are Jewish Holocaust Deniers.

In Britain today there is a group of communists who masquerade as anti racism campaigners called Unite Against Fascism. Despite the respectable sounding name, the truth is they are anything but respectable. They act like they are some on kind of moral high grounds should anybody dare to criticize Islam, falsely branding people fascists and Nazis without question. Yet when it comes to Jews or any other religion for that matter they aren’t so quick to leap to their defence. Islamophobia is big money business and they know it. Therefore their alliance with Jew hating Islamic extremists takes preference over all else.

When most people think of the holocaust, you think as many as 6 million innocent  Jews rounded up and exterminated by one of the most evil sadistic men to ever walk on this earth, no not the prophet Mohammed but Adolf Hitler and his Nazi murderers. Mass genocide in the gas chambers.

Yet the communist far left have a different version of events. In their leaflet opposing a BNP hatefest in Derbyshire, they hypocritically they call the BNP Nazis and holocaust deniers.  The leaflet carries the name of the Socialist Workers Party, its front group Unite Against Fascism and the fronts front group Love Music Hate Racism.

It states:  The BNP denies the holocaust where 1000s of LGBT people, trade unionists and disabled people were slaughtered.

UAF/SWP jewish holocaust denying leaflet,  unite against fascism and socialist workers party are racists

What would the SWP/UAF’s hero Leon Trotsky of made of the commies forgetting about 6 million Jews being exterminated, after all Trotsky was a JEW himself !!! Their alternative version of the holocaust is like meat pie without the main ingredient the meat.

During Hitler’s reign the phrase LGBT was unheard of. Homosexuality was a taboo subject then and anybody who was gay certainly wasn’t as forward telling people as they are today.It was kept secret not just in Nazi Germany but worldwide. Therefore the numbers of gay people who were victims of the holocaust was relevantly few. Disabled people were sent to the gas chambers and used as guinea pigs for medical research. Again relatively low numbers. Political opponents such as Marxist agitators which they must mean by trade unionists were imprisoned in the region of 30,000. Although most who died was by starvation or worked to death. Not in the gas chambers like the Jews.

uaf swp scum holcaust deniers

Bennett, Smith and co can try to hide their anti Semitic views by exaggerating the amount of non Jews who died in the holocaust but there is still 6 million or so Jews killed that are to be accounted for and that will take some serious persuasion to convince people didn’t happen.  For a group who go around preaching how they are anti-racists/anti-fascist, their failure to acknowledge the 6 million innocent Jews killed seems awfully racist and fascist. 

They also conveniently forget that as many as 20million people did in the communist gulags in the USSR. Far more than were killed by Hitler’s Nazis .

TellMama / Faith Matters-Fiyaz Mughal’s Islamic Money Making Machine

Every day my email inbox receives countless mails from random’s around the world wanting to tell me how i can be rich. I look at them thinking if only it was that simple its rubbish as i press delete. Until now that is as I have finally discovered the path to the promised land, untold riches, the ultimate get rich scheme for little effort. That path is called Islam.  Start a  Muslim group in the UK, register as a charitable organization and hey presto various government departments and  local authorities will throw large sums of money at you to fund your lavish lifestyle. If your really lucky you can even employ a few of your mates as paid advisors. Hell, mention Islamophobia or community cohesion in your mission statement  and get even more £££££. Its even recession proof as the funds keep being handed out to Muslim groups show despite the government making cuts everywhere else

After yesterdays FOI Exposé when it was revealed Bolton Council have been bank rolling The Bolton Council Of Mosques with grants totalling over £1.1 million. Now following another FOI request, Kafir Crusaders can reveal that Muslim storyteller and fixer of figures Fiyaz Mughal (via TellMama and Faith Matters) has received over £750,000 in the last 5 years from the Department for Communities and Local Government in funding

For background info on Fiyaz Mughal, Tell Mama and Faith Matters i recommend this eye-opening post from fahrenheit211

Freedom of Information Request Relating to Funding for Faith Matters

You requested information for the last 5 years of any funding allocated to the following organizations Faith Matters and Tell Mama. You wanted it to include the date, how much funding, and a description of the project.I have considered your request under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act 2000. I confirm that the Department holds the information that you have requested, and I am able to supply it to you. The information that you have requested is as follows. Tell MAMA is a project managed by Faith Matters so it is included in the list of other projects. The payments from DCLG to Faith Matters, the relevant dates and project descriptions, are as follows:

Financial Year Project Description
2012-13,2011-12 &

2010-11

 
£397,000 Measuring Anti-Muslim Attacks (Tell MAMA)
2010-11  
£22,331 Role model for Muslim Women project
£15,190 Muslim Chaplaincy project
£15,190 Muslim Chaplaincy project
2009-10  
£50,000 Caring for converts project
£33,750 Muslim Chaplaincy project
£37,675 Compilation of Mosque directory for Muslim women
£22,332 Role model for Muslim Women project
£33,600 Cohesive Communities Programme
£6,922 Living Islam out Loud project
£50,000 Caring for converts project
2008-09  
£25,870 Muslim Chaplaincy project
£37,675 Mosques Directory compilation
£14,888 Role model for Muslim Women project
£35,000 Cohesion and Faiths Funding
£990 Living Islam out Loud project

As you can see Mughal’s TellMama and Faith Matters ventures really are like an Islamic money making machine. WTF  £37k for a Mosque directory (which are plentiful on-line) in 2008-09 then the same amount again the next year for a directory of Mosques for women ! This is little more than a list of the 100 least sexist and most woman friendly UK mosques. Fiyaz Mughal OBE is certainly in the running to be awarded a BOTD to go alongside his OBE….Bullshitter Off The Decade 

Anti Fascist Salford Councillor Faces Jail Over BNP Tweet

The law applies to everyone yet for some unknown reason self appointed ‘anti-fascist’ activists constantly seem to think that it doesn’t apply to them. Hopefully anti fascist Salford councillor Howard Balkind will receive the maximum penalty for his anti BNP tweet which revealed the result of postal votes before the election was finished. Maybe then communist anti-fascists will realise the law applies to them also and their not above it like they seem to think.

Salford councillor could be jailed over Twitter comment on BNP

23 Jul 2013 17:39

Howard Balkind was reported to police by the far-right BNP for tweeting that the party would be ‘lucky to get 10 votes’ at a by-election last month.

Coun Howard Balkind has been investigated by the police over a tweet he sent
Coun Howard Balkind has been investigated by the police over a tweet he sent

A councillor could be jailed over ‘off the cuff’ Twitter remarks made during an election count.

Howard Balkind was reported to police by the far-right BNP for tweeting that the party would be ‘lucky to get 10 votes’ at a by-election last month.

It is alleged that Coun Balkind broke the law by revealing the results of postal votes before polls had closed the Weaste and Seedley ward.

Coun Balkind, a prominent anti-fascist and anti-BNP campaigner in Salford, now faces a wait while the Crown Prosecution Service decided whether to press charges under the Representation of the People Act.

Under the 1983 act, the maximum penalty for making ‘any statement relating to the way in which voters have voted at the election’ before polls close is six months in prison or a £5,000 fine.

The BNP’s complaint was made after polling closed, shortly before midnight on Thursday, June 20, over the tweet, posted the previous Tuesday.

Coun Balkind was interviewed by police under caution on the Friday morning after the complaint was lodged with police then passing the file to the CPS to decide whether to prosecute.

Labour’s Paul Wilson eventually won the election with 785 votes while the BNP came fifth, Kay Pollitt polling 74 votes.

The election campaign became mired in controversy after Salford council were legally obliged to supply Ms Pollitt with a room to stage a public meeting, leading to protests joined by Coun Balkind which caused the meeting to be moved at the last minute.

The councillor has now shut down his Twitter account and says he and his family have received ‘veiled threats’ from the @BNPSalford Twitter account.

BNP leaflets were also stuffed through his letterbox three days in row, Coun Balkind says.

He added that the police are looking into the claims.

Coun Balkind, 61, told the M.E.N. that the remarks were ‘off the cuff’ and not an attempt to reveal the results of postal voting – and called the BNP’s complaint ‘vexatious’.

He added: “The whole thing has become ridiculous. The BNP are claiming they suffered because what I tweeted cost them votes but it is their poisonous politics that cost them votes.”

A GMP spokesman said: “On Thursday 20 June 2013, police were called following allegations of a breach of section 66 of the Representation of the People Act. A man was interviewed under caution at Pendleton police station and enquiries are ongoing.”

A BNP spokesman confirmed that party members had reported Coun Balkind to the police.

He added: “After legal advice from Salford city council, the Electoral Commission and our own legal team it was established that Mr Balkind acted in a way that breached the secrecy code in regards to the election process by tweeting from his official account, results of the first postal vote opening that he had attended earlier that week, before the close of ballots of the recent Weaste and Seedley by-election.

“We cannot comment any further as a criminal investigation is under way, and for the record the British National Party will press for charges.

“In relation to further claims of harassment, that is nothing more than a smoke screen to cover up the key fact of him breaking the law.”

http://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/news/greater-manchester-news/salford-councillor-could-jailed-over-5270085

Fiyaz Mughal And Tell Mama Pay The Ultimate Price For ‘Cycle Of Violence’ Taqiyya

Follow up to last weeks Tell Mama Tell Lies,  Anti-Muslim Attacks Taqiyya

My heart bleeds for Tell Mama the anti Muslim attack monitor and its lying mufti Fiyaz Mughal. The Telegraphs Andrew Gilligan has today revealed that  Tell Mama will be receiving no more of the taxpayers hard-earned money to bankroll the Islamist opponents of free speech, including the well paid for doing little salary of Fiyaz Mughal and his Muslim only staff. I’ll try not to laugh too much as i type LOL

Mughal certainly made the most of his 5 minutes of fame since Woolwich managing to get his face on almost every TV channels news reports as well-being quoted  in newspaper reports on a daily basis. He spent that much time in the spotlight telling all and sundry how Muslims were the are victims, that he is now at z-list celebrity level, managing to become the UK’s  5th most well-known Muslim behind Abu Hamza, Anjem Choudary, George Galloway and Mo Ansar.  Making the most of his new-found fame, it wouldn’t surprise me should the extremists from Islam TV offer him his own TV show. Another distinct possibility is Unite Against Fascism snapping him up. They are quite partial to having z listers as anti fascists such as Ken Livingstone and Doreen Lawrence. Mughal could be their full-time sympathy seeking Islamoaner as Al-Qaeda supporting vice chair Azad Ali with his Muslim extremist background doesn’t pull the nations heartstrings to well.

Civil servants and Police officers raised concerns about  Tell Mama’s methods and the authenticity of the anti Muslim attacks being logged. Maybe they should listen to patriots a little more as myself  like countless others have been critical of TellMama and dubious about its whole existence and motives since it started. It would have saved Nick Clegg wasting £214,000 of the taxpayers money in a grant on top of the £160,ooo it had already received which i wasn’t  aware of till now. This new figure makes Tell Mama’s value for money even less. For its first year’s not so massive amount of 18 prosecutions that now works out at just over £20,000 of grant money each!

So what exactly has Mughal been using the £375,000 that it has had in grants over the last year.A nice big fat salary for himself no doubt for starters. As far as i could tell commie trolls such as Evelyn Cook and her multiple fake accounts provided Tell Mama with most of its reports. Even then it averaged out at 2 a day only which Mughal could have easy logged in his spare time say an hour a night. Why he had to employ his Muslim only staff  is beyond me. Looks like jobs for the boys to me, a meal ticket for his Faith Matters people whilst they engage in Dawwah pushing Islam onto the public

I imagine Tell Mama will now disappear into obscurity with no credibility or grant to pay Mughal’s salary. Times up for this Islamic scam. Good riddance 

Muslim hate monitor to lose backing

Ministers end funding for body that claimed ‘wave of attacks’ against Islam.

Fiyaz Mughal of Tell Mama.

Fiyaz Mughal of Tell Mama. Photo: REX FEATURES

By Andrew Gilligan

7:00AM BST 09 Jun 2013

A controversial project claiming to measure anti-Muslim attacks will not have its government grant renewed after police and civil servants raised concerns about its methods.

The project, called Tell Mama, claimed that there had been a “sustained wave of attacks and intimidation” against British Muslims after the killing of Drummer Lee Rigby, with 193 “Islamophobic incidents” reported to it, rising to 212 by last weekend.

The group’s founder, Fiyaz Mughal, said he saw “no end to this cycle of violence”, describing it as “unprecedented”. The claims were unquestioningly repeated in the media.

Tell Mama and Mr Mughal did not mention, however, that 57 per cent of the 212 reports referred to activity that took place only online, mainly offensive postings on Twitter and Facebook, or that a further 16 per cent of the 212 reports had not been verified. Not all the online abuse even originated in Britain.

Contrary to the group’s claim of a “cycle of violence” and a “sustained wave of attacks”, only 17 of the 212 incidents, 8 per cent, involved the physical targeting of people and there were no attacks on anyone serious enough to require medical treatment.

There have been a further 12 attacks on Islamic buildings, three of them serious, including a probable arson attack on a Muslim community centre in north London, which burned it to the ground.

Tell Mama supporters launched a furious campaign of protest againstThe Sunday Telegraph after it disclosed the breakdown last week, with round-robin emails to the newspaper accusing it of behaviour “better suited to the days of 1930s Germany”.

However, The Sunday Telegraph has now learned that even before Woolwich, the communities minister, the Liberal Democrat MP Don Foster, called Mr Mughal to a meeting and said that Tell Mama’s grant would not be renewed.

The organisation has received a total of £375,000 from the Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) since last year.

“Mr Mughal was giving data on attacks to DCLG which wasn’t stacking up when it was cross-referenced with other reports by Acpo [the Association of Chief Police Officers],” said one source closely involved in counter-extremism.

“He was questioned by DCLG civil servants and lost his temper. He was subsequently called in by Don Foster and told that he would receive no more money.”

A senior Liberal Democrat source confirmed the sequence of events, saying: “There was a bit of a spat. He was called in and told that Acpo had cast doubt on his figures. He was told that he would be closely monitored for the remaining period of the grant and that there would be no more money.”

A DCLG spokesman confirmed that Tell Mama’s funding would not be renewed and refused to deny that officials had raised concerns about its methods.

Tell Mama claimed in March that anti-Muslim crime was “rising”, even though the group had only been in operation at that stage for a year and had no previous figures to compare with.

Other figures, collected by the police, show that hate crime in mainly Muslim areas has fallen in the past 10 years. The only large force that collects figures on specifically anti-Muslim crime, the Metropolitan Police, reported an 8.5 per cent fall in such crimes between 2009 and 2012.

There was a spike in anti-Muslim incidents after the killing of Drummer Rigby. However, contrary to Tell Mama’s claims that it was “unprecedented”, the Met’s assistant commissioner, Cressida Dick, told MPs last week that it was “slightly less” than after previous terror attacks.

“There has not been such a very big increase in attacks as we might have feared,” she said. Mr Mughal himself has now admitted to the BBC that the number of physical attacks was “small”.

Tell Mama has also been using its budget to threaten members of the public with libel actions for criticising it on Twitter.

In mid-May, before Woolwich, one Jewish activist, Ambrosine Chetrit, received a threatening letter from solicitors after she tweeted that “Tell Mama are sitting on Twitter on the EDL hashtag, threatening anyone and everyone whose comments they do not like about Islam”.

Tell Mama also objected to a tweet in which Ms Chetrit said it was “trying to close down pro-Israel [Twitter] accounts daily”.

Other recipients of legal threats at the same time include Atma Singh, a former race adviser to the then Labour mayor of London, Ken Livingstone, who received a legal letter from Tell Mama after tweeting that it “gives a platform to Islamists”.

Tell Mama did not claim that either of these individuals was racist or anti-Muslim. But it said their tweets were false and “defamatory” of Mr Mughal, had “damaged” his reputation, causing him “distress and embarrassment”, and demanded immediate apologies and damages. Up to four other people are believed to have received similar threats.

The letters were written by Farooq Bajwa, a solicitor who has acted for a number of Islamists and Islamist sympathisers, including the Palestinian radical leader Raed Salah and the Respect MP George Galloway.

The letters to Mr Singh and Ms Chetrit were sent to their private home addresses, neither of which are in the public domain. Ms Chetrit’s lawyer, Mark Lewis, who has acted for many phone-hacking victims, has reported Mr Bajwa and Tell Mama to the police after they refused to say how they obtained the information.

“I have been instructed to resist the claim,” said Mr Lewis. “It has no merit. I have not had any response as to how my client’s name and address were obtained.”

Mr Singh said: “I find it absurd that someone can threaten people on this kind of basis and use libel in this political way. This is nothing to do with Islamophobia – they are just trying to shut down debate.”

Ms Chetrit said: “It is very worrying and scary. All the people who have been threatened by Tell Mama are pro-Israeli.”

The DCLG claimed that Tell Mama’s funding was always due to cease in September 2013 and that Mr Foster was “very impressed” by the “progress” the group had made.

However, the funding of Tell Mama was described as “ongoing” in the Government’s “hate crime action plan” last year and only in November Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, announced that £214,000 of “new” and “further” funding had been granted to Tell Mama.

Mr Mughal said: “The meeting with DCLG officials related to the publication of 2012 anti-Muslim prejudice figures and having an independent review of those figures, which is good practice.

“This was agreed and has always been part of the process. The ‘loss of temper’ did not relate to the methodology of data collection.”

Mr Mughal said that no public money had been used to issue the libel threats.

He said: “We will defend the right of all people to express their identities and their support for countries and groups freely.

However, we have the right to defend the integrity of our work when people broadcast [on Twitter] comments that are simply untrue and highly damaging about us.”

He declined to explain how the private addresses had been obtained, but said it was “within the law.”

Source
Please consider sharing this post with your friends and  like our new Facebook page  to raise awareness  to the threat of Islam to all our futures

Who’s This Old Slapper? Brighton UAF Supporter Who Keeps Appearing In Commie Demo Riots

Reblog From Casuals United

This #Brighton Commie sure gets about to riots and disturbances. Who knows her? #edl

7062013

Here she is being evicted from Hove UKIP meeting

Here she is being evicted from Hove UKIP meeting

Here attacking MFE 2012

Here attacking MFE 2012

Attacking BNP last week

Attacking BNP last week

MFE 2012 attacking police

MFE 2012 attacking police

MFE 2013 someone must know the ugly mare

MFE 2013 someone must know the ugly mare

Read the original  and more posts exposing Commies/Islamists at the excellent Casuals United Blog

Tell Mama Tell Lies, The Anti-Muslim Attacks Taqiyya

For anybody who has never heard of Tell Mama, they are an organization that set up last year to measure hate crimes against Muslims in the UK. Naturally its run by other Muslims who are out to look after their own. The 1st thing you have to ask yourself does Britain really have that much a problem with anti Muslim hate crimes to warrant a group set up specifically to monitor them. I mean there’s already plenty of other Muslim think tanks and other so called ‘anti fascist’ groups looking after the Muslims interests. Now if it a charity and was staffed by Muslim volunteers then fair enough. But Tell Mama’s Muslim only staff aren’t volunteers. Their paid employees.  Paid by who you may ask…. Paid for by who do you think… The British taxpayer.  Last year Tell Mama received a nice £200,000 + grant from the Deputy PM Nick Clegg to help tackle ‘Islamophobia’

After the savage murder of Drummer Lee Rigby by two Muslim extremists, there has been much mentioned in the news also of alleged revenge attacks anti Muslim hate crimes.  One person who keeps getting his face on the news and quoted in the press is Fiyaz Mughal from Tell Mama. Anyone who has seen his interviews will hear him claiming in the week after Woolwich anti Muslim attacks have gone through the roof. By the time he has finished your left questioning yourself as to who is actually the victim in all this. The murdered soldier or the poor old Muslims. If Mughal and other Islamic apologists have their way you will be thinking the Muslims are the victim in it all, Muslims are not the victim. Forget what Tell Mama’s Fiyaz Mughal has said, forget anything else you have seen or heard about the 10 fold increase in anti Muslim hate crimes elsewhere in the media. The statistics used by the media to come to the conclusion of mass Islamphobic attacks have all originated at the same source…………Fiyaz Mughal and his TellMama posse.

Fiyaz Mughal and his TellMama have been using taqiyya, lying for allah to push the islamic cause

The Telegraph’s  Andrew Gilligan has  uncovered the truth about Fiyaz Mughal and his TellMama’s alleged anti-Muslim hate crimes since Woolwich. Mughal and TellMama have been committing Taqiyya, deceiving and telling lies to further the cause of Islam. Something which admittedly he was doing quite well judging by the amount of articles in the last week portraying Muslims as the victim. The media especially leftists such as the BBC and Guardian have made a huge deal out of the alleged anti Muslim backlash that has apparently happened although most mainstream media has carried stories on it. And it is that figure issued by Tell Mama – of, to date, 212 “anti-Muslim incidents” since the Woolwich murder – which has formed the basis of nearly all this reporting

Fiyaz Mugal has claimed there has been “a wave of attacks, harassment, and hate-filled speech against Muslims … an unprecedented number of incidents”, including “a rise in street harassment of Muslims – unprovoked, opportunistic attacks from strangers as Muslims go about their lives”

He added: “Over the past week or so, these sorts of hate crimes have noticeably increased in number and, in many instances, become more extreme.“The scale of the backlash is astounding … there has been a massive spike in anti-Muslim prejudice. A sense of endemic fear has gripped Muslim communities.”

I do not see an end to this cycle of violence. There is an underlying Islamophobia in our society and the horrendous events in Woolwich have brought this to the fore.”And as he put it on Today, “the [Government’s] Prevent [anti-extremism] agenda, the extremist agenda, have not been good for building confidence – the sense of fear just alienates and isolates communities.”

Tell Mama are doing their utmost to portray Muslims as the victims, even attempted to deflect some of the negative attention onto the EDL trying to equate them to Islamic jihadists. As Gilligan quite rightly points out in his article nobody has been killed by the EDL yet many by Islamic terrorists. More disturbing is the breakdown of the alleged 212 anti Muslim hate attacks in the week since Woolwich, which the media have been quick to believe as gospel and publish.

The Telegraph article found  the following

The truth about the ‘wave of attacks on Muslims’ after Woolwich murder

Tell Mama confirmed to The Sunday Telegraph that about 120 of its 212 “anti-Muslim incidents” – 57 per cent – took place only online. They were offensive postings on Twitter or Facebook, or comments on blogs: nasty and undesirable, certainly, but some way from violence or physical harm and often, indeed, legal. Not all the offending tweets and postings, it turns out, even originated in Britain.

Tell Mama has no written definition of what it classes as an anti-Muslim incident, but has in the past adopted a wide definition.

 Mr Mughal admitted that a further 35 of the 212 post-Woolwich incidents, or 16 per cent, had yet to be verified.He justified publishing the figure, however, saying he expected that all but a handful of incidents would be verified.

Only 17 cases (8 per cent) – involved individuals being physically targeted.Six people had things thrown at them, said Mr Mughal, and most of the other 11 cases were attempts to pull off the hijab or other items of Islamic dress.Without in any way denying the distress and harm caused by such attacks, they do stand at the lower levels of seriousness.

Asking other police forces and trawling local media reports, The Telegraph has been unable to find a single confirmed case since Drummer Rigby’s death where any individual Muslim has received an injury requiring medical treatment.

Tell Mama’s Twitter feed reported one such incident, of a Muslim woman “knocked unconscious” in Bolton, but the local police said they had no knowledge of this and did not believe it happened. It is unlikely, though not impossible, that any case of serious injury could have escaped the notice of the media or police.

Perhaps the most serious manifestation of anti-Muslim feeling after the killing was a number of attacks on mosques. These are believed to total 11, though here again evidence for a “wave of violence” is lacking. With only two exceptions, a mosque in Grimsby into which firebombs were thrown and another one in Essex where a man entered with a knife, all the incidents were relatively minor, such as window-breaking or graffiti.

For Islamists such as the Cordoba Foundation(Muslim Brotherhood Front that recruits potential extremists) , the narrative of British Muslims under attack, increasingly hated and feared by their fellow citizens, is essential for recruitment, and for furthering their central lie that different races and faiths cannot coexist.  Mr Mughal has written in the Cordoba Foundation’s journal (he says it was a “mistake” which he will not repeat).

“Islamophobic” is also a handy charge to throw at anyone who questions Islamist ideology. But part of its motivation appears to be an attempt to draw some of the sting from Islamist terrorism by equating it with the work of anti-Muslim extremist groups such as the English Defence League.

Even before the Woolwich incident Fiyaz Mughal and his Tell Mama group had been in the press making a big deal about their successes over the last year . Bearing in mind they received almost a quarter of a million pound grant, you would be expecting a huge amount of anti Muslim hate crimes reported and subsequent people prosecuted.  Well no actually it measured the huge amount of 632 anti Muslim hate crimes in the last year.

Fiyaz Mughal:

A five-year old girl sent flying from the bonnet of a car, left unconscious in the road by a hit-and-run driver. A pregnant woman watching her husband being beaten up by her neighbour’s boyfriend, their children terrorised by constant abuse. A family forced from their home in Nottinghamshire, leaving behind graffiti and a ham-wrapped cross on their doorstep. Or a young woman who had faeces thrust onto her hijab in a south London street.All these and more are just some of the 632 (and rising) cases reported during the first year of ‘Tell MAMA’, the UK’s national anti-Muslim hate crime project, which my organisation Faith Matters runs. Our project reveals some disturbing findings. The majority of Muslims being physically attacked, harassed or intimidated because of their faith are women, according to MAMA’s figures – and those doing it are white men increasingly likely to be linked to far-right groups.Three-quarters (74%) of incidents reported to MAMA took place over social media (Twitter, Facebook, etc), but there have also been attacks on mosque buildings, against pregnant women and ‘visible’ hijab (veil) wearers, even children and pensioners in their 80s.

The most serious instances of  Anti Muslim hatred he mentions have a few facts omitted for starters. Now a 5-year-old being knocked over and left unconscious by a hit and run driver is shocking yes, but a hate crime ??  Was the driver arrested and it proved that he purposely knock the child over just because she was a Muslim? I very much doubt it because it would be front page news for weeks with the Muslims making the most out of playing the victim.

The family forced from their home in Nottinghamshire, leaving behind racist graffiti and a ham-wrapped cross on their doorstep. What Tell Mama fail to mention here is that those responsible weren’t a bunch of neo-Nazi’s  who hounded them out of their home but the actions of a 13 year old child.

Almost 3/4 of the alleged hate crimes they have logged were from social media websites such as Twitter and Facebook and little more than words. Anyone familiar with Twitter and Facebook will know that there is a number of  communist internet trolls who have nothing better to do than trawl peoples Facebook personal profiles and tweets looking for anything remotely offensive to screenshot and report.

 Visibly-identified far-right British National Party (BNP) or English Defence League (EDL) members were linked to over half (54%) of all incidents. Our work has led to the arrests of 21 far-right EDL supporters, with over 40 incidents reported against EDL leader ‘Tommy Robinson’ alone. Eighteen prosecutions have taken place, although we would like the police and CPS to do much more in this area

So it’s hardly surprising then that BNP and EDL members make up for half of the reported anti-Muslim attacks when it is their social media accounts that Tell Mama and the trolls are constantly checking on. Clearly the Muslims at Tell Mama are on some kind of witch-hunt against anybody who speaks out against Islam considering there has been 40 reports  of alleged anti Muslim attacks logged against EDL leader Tommy Robinson. Yet the police haven’t deemed them worthy of any kind of action which leaves a big question mark as to what Tell Mama deem as an anti- Muslim attack as the police don’t consider them serious enough to punish. Even more laughable is the fact that out of all their reports only 18 people have been prosecuted. This works out to just short of £12,000 in grant money per arrest. Hardly value for money is it What  Tell Mama and other similar groups do purposely is omit certain details to make things look more juicy. This is just another Muslim organization aimed to push Islam and silence its critics. Another weapon in the stealth jihad going on all around us. By pushing ‘Islamophobia’ into people’s faces. It allows Muslims to not only to try to shut up those who speak out against it by making Islam a taboo subject. It keeps the grants coming in and creates jobs for Muslims. Allowing them to push the Islamic agenda even more.

Islamophobia is a big money industry,portraying Muslims as victims and keeping it in the spotlight is good for business. This is something groups like UAF and Hope not Hate realised long ago that by demonizing a certain section of the public whom you dislike or hold opposing views to your own such as patriot groups like the English Defence League. Constantly trying to make them look bad  by telling lies and scaremongering keeps the money rolling in. In the UAF’s case it’s a money-making machine and recruiting method for its SWP puppet masters. For HnH it those helps the book sales on racism by Nick Lowles and Matthew Collins. In Tellmama’s case its fund to push Islam to the public as part of their stealth jihad.

UAF Havent Learnt Their Lesson And Invite Islamic Hate Preacher To Speak In Woolwich

Looks like UAF haven’t learnt much of a lesson about their association with Islamofascists after it emerging Woolwich Muslim Killer Michael Adebolajo had given a hate speech at ‘Unite Against Fascism’ counter demo. It would seem the SWP’s money making machine has once again got into bed with Muslim extremists for today’s Woolwich counter BNP demo, this time in the form of radical hate preacher Shakeel Begg who is a known homophobic and also  for his jihad loving and defence of  Muslim terrorists. 

Radical hate preacher Shakeel Begg is a Homophobic gay hater who supports jihad

Reblog from Harry’s Place

Unite Against Fascism and Shakeel Begg

Lucy Lips, May 31st 2013, 3:27 pm

There is no good time to team up with Islamist extremists. There are also especially bad times to make such a foolish move. The aftermath of the terrorist murder in Woolwich is one of those times.

Yet this is exactly what the self-styled “anti-racists” of Unite Against Fascism (UAF) say they will do tomorrow in Woolwich. One of the scheduled speakers at their rally will be Shakeel Begg, who is closely associated with the Lewisham Islamic Centre.

Begg is a hate preacher with a special interest in terrorist suspects and convicts. Have a look at him here at a conference staged by Cageprisoners, the terrorist support group. Begg finds former Guantanamo inmates “inspiring” and worthy of a divine salute.

“…[it is] inspiring to be amongst some of our brothers who madehijra [migration] in the path of Allah, who made jihad in the path of Allah, who suffered in the path of Allah, our brothers from Guantanamo Bay. May Allah have mercy upon them, may Allah accept all their good deeds and all their fasting especially in the month of Ramadan, and may Allah grant them jannah [paradise].”

You’ll see more of the same in this clip from a meeting of Hhugs, another terrorist support group. This time Begg hails jihad as “the greatest of deeds”.

Helping the families of brothers who are in prison, giving to those families, supporting those families, coming to their aid when they are in times of need and help, is like as if we are making jihad in the path of Allah. And we know jihad in the path of Allah is of the greatest of deeds that a Muslim can take part in.

On and on it goes in Mr Begg’s record. See this clip, for example, from an extremist rally at Belmarsh. He calls the prison’s terrorist inmates “brothers” and rails against their “oppressors”. Note that these are dangerous men who have been snared by the British security and legal systems, not people picked up in Afghanistan and dumped in Guantanamo.

Naturally Israel too must be targeted. According to a report in 2006, Begg has told British Muslims they should join the jihad against it.

Shakeel Begg, another radical cleric, recently urged students at Kingston University, southwest London, to wage jihad in Palestine. In a tape-recorded speech obtained by The Sunday Times, Begg, who is a Muslim chaplain at Goldsmiths College, part of London University, said: “You want to make jihad? Very good… Take some money and go to Palestine and fight, fight the terrorists, fight the Zionists.”

As for the police, they must not be helped, for they are the devil. Here he savages another preacher who spoke at a police conference.

It is ridiculously outrageous for a Muslim speaker to lure the anti-terrorism officers into using him and other religious leaders against the Muslim community. This is not to say that we should not work to prevent unlawful violence. In fact, many have been at the forefront of this work, without signing a deal with the devil, or joining any sort of alliance, be it natural or otherwise, with the brutal, cunning and oppressive anti-terrorism workforce.

Mr Begg is most certainly not working to “prevent unlawful violence”. He is stoking the very fires that have produced British terrorists time after time, while slating the brave officers fighting terror as evil people whom Muslims must shun.

This is no one off for the UAF. The far left sect has long made a point of helping such dangerous haters. In fact, one of UAF’s vice chairs is none other than Azad Ali, the notorious extremist of the Islamic Forum of Europe. Ali doesn’t even have time for democracy if it comes without sharia law.

Democracy, if it means that, you know, at the expense of not implementing the sharia, of course no one agrees with that.

The record is plain. Everyone should see UAF as part of the problem and no component of any solution.

Yet Labour figures Len Duvall AM and Jennette Arnold AM are scheduledto speak at the UAF rally tomorrow. If they actually do, they are idiots.

Video: UAF/SWP’s Martin “Sex-Case” Smith Takes A Deserved Holiday In Greece

While the majority of us hard working law abiding Brits have spent the last few weeks having to put up with the near Arctic conditions. Struggling about our daily business in the snow and cold. Well one lucky person who didnt have to suffer that was the UAF’s Martin “Sex-Case” Smith who was enjoying a well deserved break in the warmer climate of Greece funded 1 way or another by paying members of  Britain’s trade unions who fund the Socialist Workers Party front group.

 Martin Smith is making the most of his freedom which by rights he shouldn’t have.  He should be under the care of HMP in the nonce wing with the Rochdale grooming gang  as neighbours who the UAF defended. Smith is of course the infamous SWP leading member ‘Comrade Delta’ who was accused of raping a female SWP commie. His left wing extremist friends at the SWP like the Muslims their quick to defend don’t believe in one law for all and decided to hold their own sexist sharia court to  find Smith not guilty and cover the event up.Obviously they know better of these things than the police and the British justice system.Its unclear what has happened to the victim or if she was sentenced to 100 lashes by the kangaroo court in true sharia style.

In true UAF style Smith is in the video in Greece going on about the EDL and BNP being the scum of the earth, like the Greek commies even know who they were. Listening to him go on about multiculturalism and smashing the fascists you would think he was whiter than whiter on some kind of morale high ground. Even fellow commies have got the type of person he is sussed out, to quote 1 communist member:

   “it is undeniable that he is a bully and a thug. It was Smith, for example, who hounded comrade Simon Wells out of the SWP – and later wrestled him to the ground at the SWP’s Marxism festival to confiscate his ticket. It was Smith whose phone calls were dreaded by SWP organisers, and resembled the hectoring of the worst kind of shop-floor manager “

The man has a the bare faced cheek to get on a stage calling people scum, when there’s no more filth than a rapist 

Hypocrites Weyman Bennett and Sabby Dhalu from UAF oppose human rights now its not a Muslims in question

I posted yesterday regarding my agreement with the European court of  Human Rights decision in favour of the BNP bus driver who was unfairly dismissed because of his political view.My agreement was down to the fact i think everybody should be able to have the freedom of choice regardless of their views. The fantasist’s from the UAF disagree  with the human rights courts decision for some unknown reason. Surely they cannot be against people having human rights and  freedoms. Or is it only when that person happens to be a non white Brit or  a Muslim. Any other time they would be rejoicing the ECHR decision and had it been a Muslim unfairly dismissed they would be actively supporting them. So whats the difference between political Islam  and supporting the BNP? There both the individuals choice  who are free to change their mind at any-time as to what they believe.I thought they was the anti fascists who were pro human rights and against people being ruled by oppression. Yet here there supporting restricting peoples freedoms.The UAF pick and choose issues to suit themselves. The same situation 2 times,1st they support it.Yet replace that extremist who they support for a different kind of extremist. Then suddenly there against what they was all for previously. HYPOCRITES either your for peoples human rights and freedoms or your against it. Not depending on who’s human rights are in question.because that would make the UAF racists and the real  fascists like many claim they really are!!

The letter below was sent to The Guardian newspaper

We disagree with the European court of human rights ruling that the dismissal of BNP councillor Arthur Redfearn was a breach of his human rights (Bus driver sacked for being in BNP wins case, 7 November). Redfearn was employed by Serco, a Bradford council contractor, and his job involved driving Asian adults and children with disabilities. The BNP is known to be a fascist and racist organisation, with leading members calling for an all-white Britain. BNP leader Nick Griffin has a conviction for inciting racial hatred after describing the Holocaust as a hoax.

Therefore members of such an organisation do present a threat to Asian and disabled people, and others targeted by fascism. Redfearn specifically presented a threat to Asian and disabled passengers. British local councils, paid for by the tax payer, have to adhere to race relations legislation. This should not be undermined by the ECHR. Membership of the BNP should be viewed in the same way as membership of the Nazi party.
Weyman Bennett and Sabby Dhalu
Joint secretaries, Unite Against Fascism

As usual the UAF have added their own bit of creativity to the facts elevating the status of the BNP  to where there made to look like the neo nazis of the aryan brotherhood inflicting violence exagrating the risk levels to Asians and disabled people . WTF disabled people ????  Do the BNP have some secret past of attacking people with disabilitys that im unaware of??  Infact do the BNP have a history of violence what so ever ??? Why bring up Griffin saying the Holocaust was a hoax when there was no mention of Jews. In fact Wayman Bennett seems to have a short memory as it wasnt that long ago he was making anti-Semitic himself comments saying that “Jews should go back to were ever they came from” 

The intent of the UAF writing the letter to the paper is just another PR stunt by the Socialist Workers Party puppet Bennett.Keep racism in the spotlight even if it means twisting the truth or telling a few lies to try justify the UAF’s very existence.Keep the funding coming in so the SWP can continue to use it as a recruiting ground for new members.

The UAF tarred all BNP members with the same brush on the basis of Nick Griffins arrest for racial hatred. So by their own rules if would only be fair to judge all UAF members on the actions of certain individuals within that group. So we can now label all the UAF anti British violent thugs who have convictions for assaulting police and   (Martin Smith)  muslim extremists and terrorist supporters (Azad Ali)  known to sexually harass women  (Martin Smith) incite mob violence and trying to start a riot(Weyman (Bennett)

The commie UAF definitely don’t practice what they preach and are guilty of having double standards. Anti-Fascists by name only. like me old nan used to tell me. T hats the pan calling the kettle black!

MP raps Euro Court of Human Rights after they rule BNP bus driver should not of been fired

Until now i had always associated the European Court of Human Rights as a bunch of leftist do-gooders who help Muslim terrorists avoid being deported to  face justice, who we do not want in our country. Then i heard about the case of Arthur Redfearn a Bradford bus driver sacked for supporting the BNP. For once i actually agree with their decision to rule against a British courts findings,common sense has prevailed and shows were allowed freedom to make our own minds up.  My agreement is nothing to do with the political party  he supported and their anti Islam position, Regardless of  who the party was, you could replace BNP with any other political party i would still think the European Court of Human Rights had made the right decision for once. For the simple reason i believe in democracy,free speech and freedom of the mind.Being able to make your own choices in life.

Now im not the greatest BNP fan,i agree with them on their position on Islam/ immigration and that’s where our common ground it ends !! But anyone who is a BNP member such as Arthur Redfearn is entirely his right. Were not in a totalitarian state just yet. Although we maybe in the near future if the Muslims or commies get their way. Someone’s support of the BNP or anyone else doesnt make that person automatically unfit for the job all of a sudden. Serco’s lame reason for dismissal “on the grounds that his views presented a health and safety risk as many of his passengers were Asian.” is just more political correctness and tiptoeing round Muslims.

What did Serco think, that when it became well known he was a BNP member that suddenly he would go bandit. Overnight change from a good employee to psycho. Launching into an abusive verbal tirade and physical attacks of  any Asians  Or maybe crash his bus into a wall to injure the Asians on board with no airbags .Id say there’s a considerably higher chance that the person from Serco who decided he should lose his job was a Muslim or socialist abusing their power due to their own discriminatory views.

Everything in life has what is considered by the majority as the norm middle line. No matter what the subject in question is or how controversial it may be there will always be some who veer off that line and have a difference of opinion. Which is their right to as free people.If supporting 1 political party or another justifies sacking someone then why not open the floodgates there’s a thousand other reasons the could be a sack able offence.

What about if the bus driver was a keen hunter at a weekend and it upsets anyone who thinks hunting is barbaric?  Or a member of the rump steak appreciation society and it upsets vegans?  Or the driver and his missus are wife-swappers and it upsets any people who believe traditional marriage? or if he was a Jehovah witness and it upsets pro life people who object to refusing their own children a blood transfusion. Where do you stop once you start and who decides who’s if a Muslim being upset at a BNP member is more or less important than anyone elses upset over a clash of personal opinions.

Thats why in 1 sense Arthur Redfearn victory in court is a victory for all free people. Conflict of opinions which certain people may or may not get upset over will always be there in a democratic nation. Get on with it,  THAT’S LIFE!!! 

MP raps Euro snub for British law over fired BNP bus driver

7:00am Wednesday 7th November 2012 in News By Jo Winrow, City Hall Reporter

A decision by the European Court of Human Rights to snub British law and rule that a Bradford bus driver should not have been sacked from his job because of his BNP membership came under fire last night.

Arthur Redfearn, who represented Wibsey ward on Bradford Council for the far-right party for two years, lost his job in 2004 shortly after he won the seat.

He had been working for West Yorkshire Transport Service for seven months, driving vulnerable adults and children to schools and day centres.

He was sacked by his employer Serco on the grounds that his views presented a health and safety risk as many of his passengers were Asian.

But after a long-running legal battle, the Strasbourg court yesterday said that dismissing Mr Redfearn from his job breached his right to freedom of association under Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Bradford South MP Gerry Sutcliffe criticised the decision which he said failed to take into account the district’s diverse community. “I think the company did the right thing sacking him” Mr Sutcliffe said. “I’m sad the European Courts have decided to overturn the ruling because it’s not reflective of the make-up of our community where we want to have tolerance of all society. It will re-open old wounds that don’t need to be opened.”

Disabled Mr Redfearn, who was 56 at the time of his dismissal and has an artificial leg, initially claimed race discrimination, but an employment tribunal dismissed this finding instead saying that it was on health and safety grounds as his “continued employment could cause considerable anxiety among Serco’s passengers and their carers and there was a risk that Serco’s vehicles could come under attack from opponents of the BNP”. This was later overruled by an appeals panel in 2005.

Related links

Driver sacked over BNP role

BNP councillor who drove bus ‘a safety risk’

Sacked BNP man left with £100,000 bill

Ads by Google

Business Website

Design It & Try It Now for Free. Easy Homepages with 125+ Templates!

http://www.1and1.co.uk/Business_Website

Unfair Dismissal Direct

National employment law experts. Free online assessment of your case

http://www.uddirect.co.uk

The following year the Court of Appeal allowed Serco’s appeal finding that Mr Redfearn’s complaint was of discrimination on political grounds and not racial grounds, which fell outside of the anti-discrimination laws.

Mr Redfearn, a former skills instructor and college lecturer, of Great Horton, could not claim unfair dismissal as he had not completed one year’s service with the company. He was also refused leave to appeal to the House of Lords, but vowed to take his case to the European courts, with an appeal on the BNP website helping to fund his legal bills.

In its judgment the European Court states: “The court was struck by the fact that he had been summarily dismissed following complaints about problems which had never actually occurred, without any apparent consideration being given to the possibility of transferring him to a non-customer facing role.

“In fact, prior to his political affiliation becoming public knowledge, neither service users nor colleagues had complained about Mr Redfearn, who was considered a ‘first-class employee’.”

It added: “In a healthy democratic and pluralistic society, the right to freedom of association under Article 11 must apply not only to people or associations whose views are favourably received or regarded as inoffensive, but also to those whose views offend, shock or disturb.”

“It was therefore the United Kingdom’s responsibility to take reasonable and appropriate measures to protect employees, including those with less than one year’s service, from dismissal on grounds of political opinion or affiliation.”

A spokesman for Serco said: “We are aware of the initial ruling that has been made by the European Court of Human Rights concerning the case of Arthur Redfearn and we will now review and digest the findings.”

via MP raps Euro snub for British law over fired BNP bus driver (From Bradford Telegraph and Argus).