Tag Archives: APOSTATE

Police Dismissed Muslim Commited Hate Crimes Against Man Who Left ‘Hateful’ Islam

An ex Muslim from East London has spoken out after being subjected to a campaign of hate against him by Muslims following his decision to become an apostate because he realised Islam was too hateful.

Fasial Bashir,from Ilford decided to leave Islam in the summer of 2014 in  the belief that the ‘religion of peace’ was too “hateful” and “sending out the wrong message”.  The father-of-two said: “I heard religious people say things I couldn’t put up with any longer – it was all too hateful.But when he stopped attending his local mosques in Ilford he claims he started getting harassment on a weekly basis from other Muslims.

Mr Bashir was twice forced to move house due to the constant abuse he was subjected to by intolerant Muslims in a rage over his choice to leave the backwards cult. He is calling on authorities to crackdown on hate crime committed by Muslims against apostates like himself claiming police dismissed his reports of hate crime to them .

The intimidation the victim received is further proof of the  backwards intolerant nature of Islam even in a secular nation where people’s choice of religion is their own right

 

Faisal Bashir claims he was forced out of his home after he renounced his faith and stopped going to mosques in Ilford.
Ilford father Faisal Bashir who claims he was forced to move house after renouncing Islam is calling for more action on hate crime

Speaking to the East London Guardian Mr Bashir said:

“These people knew I had become an atheist and soon enough my whole family was being harassed.

“At least once a week they would hang around near my house, shouting and swearing at me.

“I was called an apostate, a non-believer, I was told I had betrayed my God and my faith.”

“Sometimes they would even say things to my children – they are far too little to know what was happening, they were very frightened.”

Mr Bashir claims he would often call the police, but was told it was “just a nuisance” and was not a police matter until it was reported at least twice a month.

He said: “They always said they couldn’t really do anything because no physical altercation ever took place.

“But I’m not the kind of person to get violent with anybody.

“Also, it was always different people so they claimed they couldn’t log it as similar complaint.

“Eventually a police officer told me I should just move house to get away from it all.”

The mobile mechanic moved from Connaught Mews to Mayville Road with his wife, 11-year-old daughter, and eight-year-old son in June 2015.

He said: “We weren’t left with any other choice.

“It was very distressing for all of us, not to mention the inconvenience.

“I used to be able to walk my children to school, now I have to drive them every day.

“The new house is over a mile away, but they still managed to find us again.”

In denial : Muslim apologist Farouk Ismail chairman of the Federation of Redbridge Muslim Organisations (FORMO) thinks its just people being silly
In denial : Muslim apologist Farouk Ismail chairman of the Federation of Redbridge Muslim Organisations (FORMO) thinks its just people being silly

But chairman of the Federation of Redbridge Muslim Organisations (FORMO) Farouk Ismail was in denial claiming:

“There is no compulsion in Islam.”

“It’s up to the individual if they want to be a Muslim or not and each individual’s faith is a matter between them and God, no one else.

“I don’t think this is about religion, I think it’s the individuals involved being a bit silly.

“Maybe this man has had a family disagreement with these people or he’s anxious or destressed about something, so he’s decided to attribute it to him being an atheist.

“I think there’s also a lack of understanding about what Islam is because I go in and out of mosques in Ilford all the time and there is no hate preaching whatsoever.

“It just doesn’t exist.”

To say hating preaching does not exist in Redbridge is a blatant taqiyya  to try to deceive the gullible  ill-informed public of the true nature of how radical Islam really is. This is  only response that could be expected by an islamofascist  wahibi like Farouk Ismail. His dubious behaviour and hardline Islamic views were previously exposed by the excellent blog Fahrenheit211

Maybe Mr Ismail could explain the extremist events featuring some very well-known hate preachers and islamists in his back yard then at Redbridge Islamic Centre hosted by radical terrorist supporting imam Shakeel Begg

For example  one event at Redbridge in February 2013  hate preacher Shakeel Begg appeared alongside fellow extremists Murtaza Khan, a “death to gays” hater; London’s Taliban and Al Qaeda PR man Moazzam Begg of Cageprisoners; and the raving antisemite and death cultist Haitham Al-Haddad.

 

 

Video: TV Debate Big Questions : Muslim Apologists Deflect Questions About Killing Apostates

Extremist Abdullah al-Andalusi

 

Last weeks debate show The Big Questions was about British Muslims having a problem with apostates who have left Islam. Extremist Abdullah al-Andalusi puts to play the often used tactic of deflecting questions rather than give a straight answer. Either replying with a question back, saying something off topic or objecting to the question in some form. 

When the presenter brings up hate preacher Haitham al-Haddad.  Al-Andalusi  still can’t bring himself to condemn one of the biggest Islamofascist hate preachers there is. Saying he is not al-Haddad’s lawyer then refusing to answer because the preacher isnt there in person.

Ramadam Foundations Mohammed Shafiq did himself no favours on the show also. Despite claiming to be a moderate Muslim he showed he was anything but that. One guest hit the nail on the head when she called him a closet Islamist.

The only Muslim guest to come off without showing themselves up as an extremist was the ever reliable Usama Hasan. As close to a true Muslim reformer as you will ever come across. Hussain along with his Quillulam colleague Maajid Nawaz set the example that all Muslims living in the UK should be following instead of idiots like Mohammed Shafiq and Fiyaz Mughal who only contribute to the problem 

Worth watching just to see Mohammed Shafiq’s face at 3:20 when the female ex Muslim calls Islam a backward ideology 

Video: Muslim apostate to Christianity beheaded in Tunisia for leaving Islam (Nsfw 18+)

Warning:  This video shows barbaric Muslim savagery. It is extremely graphic and not recommended for anybody who may be offended or upset by the violent actions shown. It is intended for adult viewing only so if you under 18 years old please click 1 of the many more suitable posts instead of continuing. 

This your religious tolerance in Islam. There is no such thing, people who see the light and realise for themselves that Islam is not a true religion from God, and decide they no longer wish to be a Muslim. Maybe converting to a religion that they see as truly from God such as the victim in this video who became Christian. Risk a fate worse than a rapist or murderer. Under the barbaric and outdated shariah law which regulates every minute of every day for Muslims , and is far more authentic in their eyes than any man made laws. The punishment for apostasy(leaving Islam) is punishable by death. 

This is your ‘religion of peace’ that Muslims knowingly lie through their teeth claiming and telling  non Muslims over and over

UK Muslim TV Channels Preach Hate And Violence

Reports that Islamic TV channels on the UK’s Sky network preach hate and violence to its viewers comes as little surprise to me. Muslim channels Peace TV, Noor TV, DM Digital and Takbeer Tv were among the channels guilty of preaching hateful and extremist views to British Muslims sat at home lapping it all up. All four of them feature renowned Muslim hate preachers who spout evil promoting murder, jihad and other violence, homophobia as well as anti Christian and Jewish views. The not so relevantly named ‘Peace TV’ is co owned by Zakir Naik, a Muslim extremist cleric who calls for the murder of gays and jihad on a regular basis. He is currently banned from entering the UK because of his radical views.

Time and time again, these so called religious scholars show the Muslims claim of being ‘The Religion Of Peace’ for the taqiyya that it really is. If those Islamic preachers who teach this hate cant behave civilly and rational. What chance is there that their disciples will act in any other way than that of their peers. Personally i dislike even calling Islam a religion because that’s insulting  to the followers of other peaceful faiths. Its nothing more than an evil cult.

Preachers of hate who spread their violent word on British TV channels

Muslim fundamentalists have used British television channels to preach in favour of violent crime and killing “apostates”.

Mohammed Farooq Nizami told NOOR TV that "Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty"
Mohammed Farooq Nizami told NOOR TV that “Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty”
Zakir Naik said on the "Dare to Ask" program on Peace TV that if a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam, the death penalty should be applied
Zakir Naik said on the “Dare to Ask” program on Peace TV that if a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam, the death penalty should be applied

The communications watchdog, Ofcom, has made a series of rulings against channels which allowed “inflammatory” material to be broadcast in breach of rules which forbid extreme opinions gaining a platform on British television.

The cases, disclosed today, include examples of an imam telling viewers that those who disrespect the prophet Mohammed should be killed, and another broadcaster saying homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

The stations were found to have committed serious breaches of the broadcasting code by allowing the extreme opinions to be aired unchallenged.

Last night experts warned that the extent and seriousness of the broadcasting breaches raises questions over whether extreme Muslim speakers who were previously confined to small audiences in mosques are able to reach thousands more people by broadcasting intolerant teachings on television.

Although the channels have tiny audiences compared to the mainstream, they are targeted at Muslim communities, including people of Pakistani background, with some of the content being broadcast in Urdu and other languages.

The cases identified by Ofcom include:

* An Islamic scholar who told viewers: “It is your duty … to kill those who insult Prophet Mohammed.”

* A preacher banned from coming to Britain who used the channel – which he co-owns – to say anyone who left Islam should be put to death.

* A phone-in presenter who advocated “eliminating” anyone who disrespected Mohammed.

In some cases the channels had also breached a rule which states that they must keep recordings of all their output, raising the possibility that other inflammatory material has been broadcast but cannot be traced.

With the exception of one radio broadcaster, the channels ruled against by Ofcom are broadcast on the satellite provider Sky. It has no legal responsibility for what is broadcast on the channels it carries. It is up to the stations themselves to make sure they meet Ofcom’s standards and they can be fined or taken off the air if they do not.

The disclosure of the rulings by the broadcasting regulator comes despite a report in 2010 which warned that extremist material was being broadcast.

Tala Rajab, the researcher who wrote the report for Quilliam, the anti-extremist think-tank, said the fresh findings by Ofcom raised serious questions over the regulation of broadcast material.

“Some of these recent incidents have been quite shocking,” he said.

“If this had happened in a mosque the police would be right in pursuing a criminal investigation. But because they are being broadcast on television channels for some reason there seems to be little appetite for looking into these extreme messages.

“If these kind of comments were made against black people, for example, you can imagine a channel being shut down overnight, particularly if they had incited violence against a minority.”

The 2010 report found that the Islam Channel, Britain’s largest Islamic broadcaster, had continued to ignore Ofcom rules about impartiality and allowed controversial viewpoints to be aired despite a fine and other sanctions being imposed. It is not among the subjects of the five Ofcom rulings disclosed today.

In December a Leeds radio station, Radio Asian Fever, was fined £4,000 for breaching broadcasting rules in programmes involving a presenter called “Sister Ruby Ramadan”.

She told listeners that homosexuals should be beaten and tortured.

“If there are two such persons among you, that do this evil, the shameful act, what do you have to do? Torture them; punish them; beat them and give them mental torture,” said the presenter.

Jabbar Karim, the station’s managing director, said: “We are very embarrassed. This was a one-off incident which will never be repeated.”

Takbeer TV, based in Nottingham, has been found in breach of the code twice in 18 months for programmes which denigrated the minority Ahmadi Muslim sect. Founded in the 19th century its followers are considered by some mainstream Muslims to be misguided or even heretical.

Contributors to the most recent programmes investigated by Ofcom said Ahmadis had a “disease” and “monstrous” intentions.

Ofcom said Takbeer TV had subjected the sect’s followers to “abusive treatment” and that they would now consider an appropriate sanction such as a fine.

An Ofcom spokesman said: “The majority of Islamic channels comply with our rules. However, where we identify issues through our monitoring or complaints we investigate fully and take firm enforcement action.”

He said it was Ofcom’s duty to regulate licence holders rather than the responsibility of carriers such as Sky. However, carriers are free to decide which channels they offer, he added.

A Sky spokesman said: “Sky operates an open and regulated platform. This means any broadcaster with an appropriate Ofcom licence is free to seek distribution over the satellite platform.”

There are 14 Muslim TV free-to-air channels in Britain but their audiences are not measured by BARB, the source of viewing figures.

Takbeer TV failed to respond when asked to comment.

Preachers of hate on British TV: what they said that broke the broadcasting rules

Muslim fundamentalists have been found breaching the strict rules on what can be broadcast on the airwaves in Britain, by inciting violence and intolerance.

Abdul Qadir Jilani, left, told viewers Islamic texts authorised killing those who had left the faith

Abdul Qadir Jilani, left, told viewers Islamic texts authorised killing those who had left the faith

By David Barrett, Home Affairs Correspondent

9:00PM GMT 09 Feb 2013

Ofcom, the broadcasting regulator, has made a series of new rulings against minority channels, which are disclosed here for the first time.

The broadcasters and stations which broke the rules are:

Name: Dr Zakir Naik

Channel: Peace TV

Programme: Dare to Ask

Date: March 8, 2012

What was said: “One group of scholars, they say that if a Muslim, if he becomes a non-Muslim [inaudible] he should be put to death.

“There is another group of scholars who say that if a Muslim becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam then he should be put to death.

“I tend to agree more with the second group of scholars, who say that a Muslim, if he becomes a non-Muslim and propagates his new faith against Islam, that is the time this penalty is applied.”

What Ofcom ruled: “In Ofcom’s view it is potentially offensive for any service to broadcast comments suggesting that it is acceptable to apply a ‘penalty’ and kill any individual for renouncing their faith. Broadcasters must ensure that material which may cause offence is justified by the context.”

Dr Naik was banned from entering Britain in 2010 by Theresa May, the Home Secretary, after she ruled his presence was “not conducive to the public good”.

He had been due to give a series of lectures at arenas in Wembley and Sheffield. Mrs May said she was excluding him because his “numerous comments” were evidence of “unacceptable behaviour”.

The decision, later upheld by the High Court, was based on a sermon the Mumbai-based preacher had posted on the internet in 2006 which said “every Muslim should be a terrorist” and which went on: “Beware of Muslims saying Osama bin Laden is right or wrong. I reject them … we don’t know. But if you ask my view, if given the truth, if he is fighting the enemies of Islam, I am for him.”

However Dr Naik is the co-owner of Peace TV, a channel which is funded by a charity called the Islamic Research Foundation International.

In March last year he said in a programme he was presenting that it was appropriate to crucify, dismember or exile those who “wage war against Allah” under sharia law.

He also said it was correct to kill former Muslims who “propagate his new faith against Islam”.

Ofcom ruled Dr Naik’s show breached part of the code which states that offensive comments should be “justified by the context”.

A spokesman for PeaceTV said:”We are disappointed by Ofcom’s ruling, especially when the programme in question is an exposition of certain teachings from the Quran, which we felt were justified by the context, and didn’t attract a single complaint from a viewer.

“That said, we take our responsibilities extremely seriously and the programme will not be broadcast again.”

Name: Muhammad Farooq Nizami

Channel: Noor TV

Programme: Paigham-e-Mustafa (“Message of Mustafa”)

Date: May 3, 2012

What was said: “There is absolutely no doubt about it that the punishment for the person who shows disrespect for the Prophet is death. No one disagrees about this.

“Whoever shows disrespect for Prophet Muhammad will be given death penalty. In the whole world, there should be slaves of Mustafa [Muhammad] everywhere, and disrespectful people should be eliminated.

“One has to choose one’s own method. Our way is the peaceful way but when someone crosses the limits, faith-base emotions are instigated.”

What Ofcom ruled: “The breaches in this case … are regarded by Ofcom as serious breaches of the code.

“Ofcom is very concerned that Al Ehya [Noor TV’s parent company] still does not appear to recognise the very serious issues raised by the broadcast of Mr Nizami’s comments.”

In its ruling, Ofcom highlighted the Danish cartoon case from 2005, in which death threats were made after a newspaper published 12 images of Mohammed, and the murder of Dutch film-maker Theo van Gogh in 2004 after his film Submission was condemned by Islamic clerics.

Ofcom told Noor TV’s owners in December that it is considering imposing a fine.

A Noor TV spokesman said: “We have appointed some new directors and implemented a whole range of new training, including having the Ofcom rules translated into Urdu.”

Al Ehya Digital Television Limited, the owner of Noor TV, said Ofcom was taking a “prejudiced view” of the programme.

Noor TV is also shown across Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia. In 2011, the channel was fined £75,000 by Ofcom for a number of breaches of the code, including soliciting £1,000 donations in exchange for prayers which it said would improve health and good fortune.

Dr Mohammed Iqbal, a pharmacist from Nottingham who is a director of Noor TV, said: “We are trying to get our house in order. We are sending out messages of peace. Anything else is unacceptable to anybody.”

Name: Abdul Qadir Jilani

Channel: DM Digital

Programme: Rehmatul Lil Alameen (“Mercy unto the Worlds”)

Date: October 9, 2011

What was said: “The matter of insulting the prophet does not fall in the category of terrorism.

“Those who cannot kill such men have no faith.

“It is your duty, the duty of those who recite the holy verse, to kill those who insult Prophet Mohammed.

“Under the guidance from Islamic texts it is evident that if a Muslim apostatises, then it is not right to wait for the authorised courts; anyone may kill him.

“An apostate deserves to be killed and any man may kill him.”

What Ofcom ruled: “The statements … did amount to direct calls to action and were likely to incite or encourage crime or to lead to disorder.”

Mr Jilani is an imam at the Dar-ul-Uloom mosque in Walthamstow having studied in Pakistan, where he was born, and Saudi Arabia.

Dr Liaqat Malik, 54, the chairman of DM Digital, accused Ofcom of bias towards ethnic minorities and said the comments were taken out of context.

“I think Ofcom interpreted his comments wrongly. He wasn’t saying people should kill. He was talking about Pakistan’s blasphemy law,” said Dr Malik.

“We wouldn’t allow anyone to use our TV channel to talk about killing like that. It’s not religious TV, it’s educational, community TV.

“There are cultural differences and I think Ofcom doesn’t understand that. Some of the Ofcom committee members should be picked from the Muslim community.”

VIDEO: Muslims Throw Acid in The Face Of Pastor Umar Mulinde Who Left Islam To Become Christian

PASTOR UMAR MULINDE – ATTACKED BY MUSLIMS

On Christmas Eve 2011, two Muslim terrorists threw acid in the face of Ugandan Pastor Umar Mulinde. This video shows  Pastor Umar Mulinde speaking of his horrific ordeal when the 2 Islamo-fascist thugs changed his life for ever. You cant help but feel sorry for the man looking at his disfigurement. His crime for the attack. That he was a Muslim apostate and left the barbarity of Islam behind to spread the word of Jesus. There is no such thing as tolerance and freedom of religion in the selfish savage minds of Muslims

FULL VIDEO: The Innocent Prophet – The Film They Dont Want You To See

Anti-Islam activist Imran Firasat, the maker of a controversial documentary about Muhammad called The Innocent Prophet, is facing deportation from Spain, where he currently resides as a refugee.

The interior ministry of Spain has revoked Firasat’s refugee status and he has been given 10 days to respond through judicial process.

Firasat says that revoking refugee status usually takes about six months but in his case, it was “done in so much hurry”.

Firasat said: “They [Spanish authorities] are trying to send a message to the Muslim world that Spain will take action against all those who criticise Muhammad. Criticising Islam and exposing Muhammad are not anymore part of freedom of expression. Muslims can kill Christians, burn European flags and insult Christ. But we can´t even speak the truth about Islam.” 

The filmmaker insisted that his 70-minute documentary was based on facts contained in Islamic scripture. The controversial documentary was released by anti-Islamic American evangelist pastor Terry Jones on YouTube.

Firasat says that he will have trouble raising funds for the legal battle to retain his refugee status. If he loses, he will be deported to his home country of Pakistan, where he faces the death penalty for his anti-Islamic views.

“Speaking the truth about Muhammad has left me in a huge problem. I was already in economic trouble. And now I must hire a lawyer and wage a long fight against the injustice which I am facing from the Spanish government. Otherwise I will be deported to Pakistan, where I will be hanged to death for blasphemy,” Firasat said.

Firasat’s says his film aims to sketch the life and “true identity” of Muhammad who, according to Firasat, created Islam to achieve his own objectives.

He added: “Today what’s happening to me, tomorrow it can happen to anyone else. Slowly all Western governments will curtail our freedom of expression. We will lose our democracies and fundamental rights.”

Interpol and Swedish authorities aid Saudi Embassy to hunt Christain convert to bring back and face Shariah Court in Saudi

The ever so tolerant  Muslims in Saudi have requested the help of Interpol and Swedish authorities to help find a Saudi woman who converted to Christianity and fled the hard-line Islamist state.The woman is charged with apostasy (leaving Islam) which carries a possible death sentence in Shariah courts.Here chances dont look to good knowing these courts are highly sexist against women and that the judge and jury at these courts is a Muslim mullah with no legit law qualifications. Once again the hypocrisy of Muslims is clear, they moan and moan and moan about trivial things in  western countries,keep building new mosques and say that we should show respect to Islam. Whilst at the same time have no religious tolerance or respect for any other faiths 

 

Saudi Arabia: Convert flees; helpers to face court 
— Interpol and Swedish authorities aid Saudi Embassy to hunt convert.

By Elizabeth Kendal
Religious Liberty Prayer Bulletin (RLPB) 175
Special to ASSIST News Service

AUSTRALIA (ANS) — Since late July Saudi media have been buzzing with reports that a 28-year-old Saudi woman has embraced Christianity and fled the country, staying initially in a church in Lebanon before moving on to Sweden. According to the Saudi Gazette, the woman, Maryam, appeared on an Arabic TV channel saying she was tired of performing prayers and fasting during Ramadan — rituals that never brought her any benefit. She also criticised Saudi Arabia’s Commission for the Promotion of Virtue and Prevention of Vice. She claimed to have been converted through a dream and said that though she was raised to hate Judaism and Christianity she has come to love those religions since finding peace in Christianity.

The woman’s father said his daughter was working in an insurance company in Al-Khobar (in Saudi Arabia’s Eastern Province) when her boss, a Lebanese Christian man, influenced her and ultimately encouraged her to leave Islam. According to Saudi investigators, a second man, a Saudi national, helped the woman obtain false documents and leave the country. The woman’s family have pressed charges against the two men because apostasy (leaving Islam) is an Islamic capital offence and a Saudi woman is not allowed to get a passport without the permission of her male guardian. The men will face court on Saturday 15 September.

Prosecuting lawyer, Humood Al-Khaldi, said that whilst the penalty in Islam of death for apostasy is clear, ‘the roles played by the two men, the Saudi and Lebanese, in making the girl become Christian should be taken into consideration’. He said ‘the court should make sure first that the girl was coerced into converting to Christianity and fleeing the country’. According to Gulf News, ‘Most Saudis reacting to the Khobar woman saga . . . have been calling for stringent action against the Lebanese and Saudi nationals for their alleged roles in the case, claiming that they were “well aware of the consequences of their act”.’

Domestically, the totalitarian Wahhabist Saudi regime will be keen to perpetuate its lie that Saudi Arabian citizens are 100 percent Muslim and that the land of the two holy mosques could never produce Saudi Arabian Christians! Consequently it will be imperative that the Saudi woman, Maryam, be deemed to have been emotionally unbalanced and coerced and/or kidnapped –anything but a convert. Likewise the Saudi man must be deemed to be an opportunistic criminal –anything but a sympathiser.

Saudi media are sparing no effort to influence public opinion. Whilst initial reports described Maryam as a 28-year-old professional, later reports simply describe her as a ‘girl’. (One article stated she is 17.) According to the Saudi Gazette, Maryam’s conversion was nothing more than that of a ‘girl’ forming an ’emotional attachment to a Christian young man’. In other words, her act was emotional not rational. It also claimed the ‘girl’ rejected Islamic rituals only because she had not been properly taught to understand and appreciate them — her action was based on ignorance, not reason. The Saudi Arabic daily Al Youm claimed Maryan had contacted them, denying she had appeared on television, maintaining she is still a Muslim and requesting help to return home. According to Gulf News, Maryam’s family has suggested she may be ‘a victim of an international organisation trafficking in people’.

On 2 September the Saudi Gazette reported that ‘Interpol is co-ordinating with the Saudi Embassy in Stockholm and Swedish authorities to return the girl to her homeland before her “kidnappers” move her to another country.’ The embassy reportedly has started a search for the woman, with the aid of Swedish authorities.

PLEASE PRAY SPECIFICALLY THAT THE LORD WILL —

  • break the chains of fear and darkness that keep the hearts and minds of Saudi Arabs shackled to an Islamic Jesus who cannot save, while the biblical Jesus is waiting to show grace.
    ‘. . . you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free.’ (John 8:32)
  • work powerfully in and through Henna Sarkees, the Lebanese, and his Saudi colleague when they face the court in Al-Khobar on Saturday 15 September. May this trial be redeemed for the glory of the LORD. (Pray through Matthew 10:16-20 and 26-33.)
  • protect Maryam from a forced return to Saudi Arabia where, as an apostate, she may well face violent retribution, even death.

http://www.assistnews.net/STORIES/2012/s12090029.htm