Tag Archives: ANTI TERRORISM

PC Gone Mad: Preston School Dinner Lady Suspended For Attending Anti Terrorism Rally

Political correctness has gone mad. Despite us supposedly living in a democratic society with freedom of thought.It appears if you don’t subscribe to the leftist mainstream line it can now cost you your job. Even if that happens to be opposing terrorists killing women and children in the name of Islam.

A school dinner lady from Preston, Lancashire has been suspended for attending the ‘Unite Against Hate’ protest in Manchester. The peaceful protest against Islamic terrorism was partly organised by ex-English Defence League (EDL) leader Tommy Robinson. It also featured a number of other speakers on the day of all races and religions including members representing the Sikh, ex-Muslim and gay communities.

Moor Nook Primary School
Moor Nook Primary School Credit: ITV News.
 

Mother-of-five Rachel Booth, 27, from Preston, said she attended the rally out of sympathy for the victims of the Manchester Arena bombing. She said she went on the march with her husband, who is ex-military and mixed race, to show solidarity with the bombing victims, not to support far-right extremism.

Five days later, Mrs Booth went into work at Moor Nook Primary School in Preston, where three of her children are pupils, and was suspended on the spot by the headteacher Suzanne Clough. Mrs Booth said the head handed her a letter and asked her to read it, telling her she was suspended for attending an EDL march which was “potential gross misconduct”. Despite it not even being an EDL march.

The banner says it all! UK unite against hate. manchester march 2017. black white straight gay asian sikhs ex muslims united
The banner says it all! UK unite against hate.

Although this is what the communist trouble makers  from Unite Against Fascism(UAF) were falsely banding around in the run up to the event attempting to falsely smear those attending as fascists,racists or nazis. Their lies then aided and abetted by Manchester mayor Andy Burnham and Greater Manchester Police who falsely claimed it as an EDL march. GMP later stated it wasn’t an EDL march and by doing so was an error.

'Potential gross misconduct': Rachel Booth, (pictured) said the headteacher of Preston's Moor Nook Primary School suspended her for attending a march organised by the ex-EDL leader

“It came as a big shock,” Mrs Booth said.

“To be honest I cried when I got out of there. It’s never happened to me before.

“I have never been in any kind of trouble with police.

“The grounds for suspending me are it was an EDL march, which is a load of rubbish. Even if I was part of the EDL, which I’m certainly not, it should not have affected my job.

“I have done absolutely nothing wrong in my eyes.”

“I thought it was for the children and so I went,” she added.

Mrs Booth, who has worked at the school for four years and is suspended on full pay, is expecting to have a meeting with the school soon.But she said she has since been targeted while picking up her children from school.

“I got a bit of abuse yesterday, I got called a racist b*tch,” she said.

Tommy Robinson has since launched an online petition in support of Mrs Booth which over 20000 people have signed.The online petition can be found here.

When asked for comment headteacher Ms Clough said: “I can confirm that a member of staff has been suspended, pending further inquiries.There are a number of inaccurate statements being made and one which is important to clarify is that the member of staff is able to attend school in their capacity as a parent. It would not be proper for me to comment further.”

No doubt Moor Nook school headteacher and the majority of others teachers working there are fully paid up members of the  union National Union of Teachers (NUT). Now the NUT are one of the biggest funders of Unite Against Fascism, the Socialist Workers Party front who organised the counter protest on the day and caused all the trouble. NUT pay for a UAF magazine called Unity, which is aimed at teachers to push the SWP / UAF communist agenda knowing it will then become a factor of what they then teach in the classroom and have an influence of the children. The well paid champagne socialist NUT leader Christine Blower is also vice-chair of Unite Against Fascism. 

Regardless of any investigation into the dinner lady, unfortunately  shit sticks and the smears against her will always be there. She has her reputation ruined when doing nothing wrong and is the real victim here.

Manchester 11-06-2017 : Unite Against Terrorism Event

Following the  recent savage terror attack at the Manchester Arena, join fellow concerned citizens and anti extremism activists in Manchester City Centre next Sunday (11th June 2017) as they make a stand against the cancer of Islamic hatred infesting our once peaceful and great nation.

MANCHESTER - SUNDAY JUNE 11TH - UNITE AGAINST ISLAMIST HATE AND TERRORISM.  GAYS AGAINST SHARIA, TOMMY ROBINSON, REBEL MEDIA, SIKH AWARENESS
MANCHESTER – SUNDAY JUNE 11TH – UNITE AGAINST ISLAMIST HATE AND TERRORISM

Originally the Manchester  event which had  been planned before last weeks horrific terrorist attack  in the city by a group called Gays Against Sharia UK was to focus on Islams hate towards LGBT people. But following the Muslim committed cowardice that killed and maimed innocent women and children in the name of Allah, the focus of the planned event has now changed to objecting to Islamic hate and terrorism aimed at all us infidels with several prominent activists and groups from a variety of religions and backgrounds now getting involved. United as one in standing up to the threat of Islamic hate aimed at us all !

The Manchester attack was the final. Now is the time to say enough is enough and make some noise. KC will be there, how about you!

Muslim woman plays the victim and starts legal proceedings against interrogation at airport

A Muslim woman who was stopped and questioned at the airport under anti terrorism law has started legal proceedings claiming that her human rights were violated. The Muslim woman was prosecuted after she refused to cooperate with the police and wouldn’t  answer their questions regarding the reasons for her visit to France. Now she is playing the victim in the whole thing like Muslims so often do despite pleading guilty to the charge of wilfully failing to comply with her duty under Schedule 7 to answer questions.  

Sylvie Beghal claims that being asked questions without a lawyer present under Schedule 7 violated the right to liberty (Article 5), right to a fair trial (Article 6) and Ms Beghal’s right to protection for her private and family life (Article 8). Under Schedule 7 anti terrorism laws a lawyer would not of been able to advise his client during questioning anyway and she had a legal duty to answer. Ultimately it was the woman’s stubbornness being awkward refusing to answer that resulted in her arrest .Now she is acting hard done to and putting  the whole schedule 7 laws at risk challenging the legality of an essential weapon in fighting terrorism.

If a person had nothing to hide then why would they object to a few questions if it helped keep our nation safe from terrorist attack. The only people who have anything to gain from those laws getting scrapped would be the Muslim terrorists who hate this country so much they want to slay as many innocent men, women and children as possible.

MUSLIMS TERROR RISK AT AIRPORT

Muslim woman in legal challenge to interrogation at airport

2:27pm Thursday 21st March 2013 in News

A Muslim woman is seeking a legal declaration that her human rights were violated when she was prosecuted after refusing to submit to an interrogation under anti-terrorism laws at an airport.

Mother-of-three Sylvie Beghal was stopped and questioned, even though she was not “suspected” of being a terrorist.

Police officers said they needed to speak to her regarding her “possible involvement” in acts of terrorism.

In what is believed to be the first legal challenge of its kind, Mrs Beghal’s lawyers argued this week at London’s High Court heard.that the entire process of stopping and questioning people “without reasonable suspicion” breaches the European Convention on Human Rights.

They said it was significant that Mrs Beghal had no right of access to a lawyer while being questioned and was being put under direct compulsion to provide information.

The court heard she indicated she would answer questions after the arrival of her lawyer, but the police chose not to wait.

When her lawyer arrived after her questioning had finished, the officers did not seek to ask her any more questions in the lawyer’s presence, three judges were told.

Mrs Beghal, a French national living in the UK, arrived back at East Midlands Airport with her children on January 4, 2011 following a visit to Paris but was not formally detained or arrested.

She was stopped at the UK Border Agency desk but refused to co-operate with questioning by Leicestershire police officers acting under powers given by schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT).

Mrs Beghal asked to consult with a lawyer and for an opportunity to pray.

After being given time to pray, police officers told her she could telephone her lawyer after she was searched. The prosecution initially accused her of physically resisting the search.

At 9.30pm she was taken to a room for an examination under Schedule 7 and asked to provide reasons for her journey, where she stayed in Paris, whom she had met or visited and how her travel was funded.

She was also asked whether she had a criminal record and about her knowledge of the French-Algerian community in Leicestershire, her use of vehicles, the languages she spoke and her current and past employment.

She failed to provide answers to most of the questions, indicating she would only answer questions after her lawyer arrived.

She was subsequently charged with wilfully obstructing a search, assaulting a constable and wilfully failing to comply with her duty under Schedule 7 to answer questions.

The first two charges were eventually dismissed in December 2011 after the Crown Prosecution Service offered no evidence and Mrs Beghal pleaded guilty to the third charge.

She did so after District Judge Temperley, sitting at Leicester Magistrates’ Court, refused her request to stay the charge as an abuse of process, and the case was referred to the High Court.

Ms Beghal’s counsel Matthew Ryder asked three senior judges – Lord Justice Gross, Mrs Justice Swift and Mr Justice Foskett – to rule Schedule 7 “incompatible” with the human rights convention.

Mr Ryder argued Schedule 7 violated the right to liberty (Article 5), right to a fair trial (Article 6) and Ms Beghal’s right to protection for her private and family life (Article 8).

Mr Ryder also argued the prosecution was an unjustifiable interference with Ms Beghal’s “right to free movement” within an EU country as an EU national.

Louis Malby, appearing for the Crown Prosecution Service, told the judges that Schedule 7 empowered officers to question a person entering or leaving the country if they “appear to be a person who is, or has been, concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism”.

Any person being questioned was under a legal duty to give the officer any information in his or her possession that was requested.

Arguing that Mrs Beghal’s rights had not been breached, Mr Malby said: “The ability to stop and examine passengers at ports is an essential tool in the protection of the public from terrorism.”

Mr Malby said Mrs Beghal was given an opportunity to consult with a solicitor in advance of questioning, and it was agreed that a telephone consultation took place.

But a solicitor would have had no purpose at the actual questioning, other than as an observer to ensure proper procedure, as Mrs Beghal was under a legal obligation to answer the questions put to her.

Reserving judgment, the judges said they would give their ruling at a future date.