Tag Archives: AIRPORT

Racist ‘Asian’ Thug Punched White Woman in Hate Attack

I doubt the grievance mongers at TellMama the Muslim hate crime monitors will be logging any details of this serious racist hate crime  with their being no infidel hate attack monitor.

Attacks like this are more common than most people think as they are easy to brush under the carpet and be forgotten about.  Fiyaz Mughal of TM conveniently forgets about attacks like this when he is making his numerous appearances in the press recycling the same old surge of Islamophobic attacks (online name calling mostly)

Heathrow Airport: Asian Man Attacks Polish Woman in Racist Attack

Heathrow Airport woman beater

CCTV cameras caught a suspected racist woman beater doing chin ups after punching a Heathrow Airport worker in the faceMet Police

A suspected woman beater was caught doing chin ups moments after he allegedly assaulted a Heathrow Airport worker in a racist attack.

Police have released images of the Asian man who is thought to have punched a Polish woman in the face after she intervened when the man racially abused another woman.

The incident happened at approximately 6.15am on Tuesday, 25 February, while the victim was waiting for a number 423 bus after she had finished her night shift.

CCTV Heathrow Airport Woman beater

An Asian man is suspected of punching a woman in the face on a bus from Heathrow AirportMet Police

As she waited, the suspect appeared and began verbally abusing another woman at the bus stop. When the victim intervened and asked him to stop he started shouting racist abuse at her.

The bus then arrived but the victim was followed onto it by the suspect who continued to racially abuse her before punching her in the face.

The victim ran off the bus while the suspect remained on it and got off in Hounslow.

He was captured on CCTV on the bus and is seen doing chin ups after the assault.

The suspect is described as being a light-skinned Asian man with untidy stubble on his face and is approximately 5ft 9ins tall and of a medium build.

Anyone with information is asked to contact the incident room on 020 3276 1351, alternatively to remain anonymous please call Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.

Source

2 Not So Bright Muslims Charged With Endangering Aircraft

Two pyjama wearing bearded followers of the ‘religion of peace’ have now been charged with endangering a passenger jet. Taxi driver Tayyab Subhani, 30, and restaurant worker Mohammed Safdar, 41, both from the Islamic enclave of Nelson in Lancashire, will appear in court on Monday. They will now have a taxpayer funded break to look forward to at one of Her Majesty’s finest prisons. If they are lucky they may be amongst friends with  plenty of Muslim grooming gang members and Islamic terrorists currently enjoying a break in the UK’s  HMP’   

Their backwards stupidity caused the Manchester bound plane to be diverted to Stansted airport  which is the designated airport for hijacks and major security incidents, with a remote area known as Compass Base set aside far from the main terminal.

Two charged with endangering jet

Two men have been charged with endangering an aircraft after a passenger jet was diverted mid-flight, police said.

Pakistan International Airways : favoured airline for bringing to the UK a mixture of uncivilized inbred muslim  to outstay their visas, health tourists,jihadists,potential sex offenders

Officers boarded Pakistan International Airlines flight PK709 and removed the men from the plane.  Photo: ALAMY

By Telegraph reporters and agencies

9:32AM BST 26 May 2013

Taxi driver Tayyab Subhani, 30, and restaurant worker Mohammed Safdar, 41, both from Nelson in Lancashire, will appear in court on Monday, Essex Police said.

The charges are in connection with an incident on Friday involving a Pakistan International Airways airliner at Stansted Airport.

An RAF Typhoon jet was scrambled to escort the Boeing 777 flight to Manchester over UK airspace before it was diverted to the Essex airport, where it landed at 2.15pm.

The flight had left Lahore at 9.35am local time and was thought to have been carrying 297 passengers.

Officers boarded Pakistan International Airlines flight PK709 and removed the men from the plane.

Reports on Friday indicated there had been a fight on board.

According to one of the passengers, the aircraft’s cabin crew said two men had repeatedly tried to get into the cockpit.

The very same plane on the very same flight – from Lahore to Manchester – had previously been diverted to Stansted on September 7 2011 due to a bomb scare.

Essex Police said the men would remain in custody ahead of their court appearance.

They will remain in police custody until their c

Christian Who Was Bullied By Muslim Co-Workers At Heathrow,Tells Of Muslim Security Risk

So often we hear about Muslim’s using the European Courts to their advantage either when their playing the victim claiming discrimination or against the British authorities to avoid deportation. More often than not the Muslims who play the system using leftist human rights laws in the European Courts are the filth of Islam. Vile undesirables such as hate preacher Abu Qatada , the suicidal Muslim terrorist and numerous Muslim rapists that have no place in civilized society. So it actually makes a refreshing change to hear about somebody planning on appealing to the courts that  has genuinely been unfairly treated.

Christian Nohad Halawi, an immigrant from Lebanon living in the UK was an employee at London’s Heathrow airport when she became the victim of Muslim bullies in the workplace. She was targeted after her Islamist co-workers discovered that she wasn’t a Muslim but a Christian. They had wrongly presumed she was a member of the cult of Islam due to her Lebanese background. Mrs Halawi became the victim of a hate campaign by the Islamofascists she worked with. After reporting the harassment and abuse by Muslims to her supervisors hoping to get the issue resolved, disgracefully found herself getting the sack when 5 of the Muslim bullies claimed she was anti-Islamic

It was only a matter of time before things like this started happening here in the UK. You only have to look at the goings on around the world involving Islamic extremists bullying and persecuting people of other faiths. Now they have got their foot in the door here, they are using political correctness against infidels as a weapon to aid their stealth jihad. With each result in their favour like Nohad Halawi losing her job, it’s another step closer to their cause of Islamizing Britain.

What is equally if not more disturbing than the bullying and her losing her job, is some of the other goings on at the UK’s busiest airport involving Muslim staff she has brought to light. Such as Muslim employees trying to convert people on the job and bullied Christians. The handing out of extremist literature and their terrorist supporting opinions they are happy to tell others.The scariest claim she has made regards some of the Muslim extremists working in airport security. She said, “if they see that you are a Muslim they wave you through. One time they thought my husband was Muslim and said ‘don’t worry he is one of us’ and let him through without checking him”

Bearing in mind the large amount of British based Islamic terrorists that we have faced lately.That it was Muslims who committed 9/11 using planes, that shoe bomber Richard Reid was British and the failed underpants bomber was radicalized in the UK. Muslim extremists working in airport security is hardly the best situation. It only takes them knowing or unknowing  letting 1 Muslim brother onto a plane who happens to have a bomb strapped to himself and we have another Lockerbie, and with it 100’s of innocent lives lost in the name of Allah. 

Christian airport worker vows to take Muslim bullying case to Luxembourg after being granted right to appeal against sacking

  • Nohad Halawi, 48, was fired in July 2011 after five Muslim colleagues complained she was anti-Islamic
  • The beauty consultant claims ‘extremist’ workmates tried to convert people on the job and bullied Christians

By DAILY MAIL REPORTER

PUBLISHED: 20:40, 12 April 2013 | UPDATED: 10:41, 13 April 2013

Fight: Nohad Halawi is pictured after her successful employment hearing todayFight: Nohad Halawi is pictured after her successful employment hearing today

A Christian worker who claims she was sacked from her job at Heathrow following a ‘race hate’ campaign by ‘Muslim extremists’ today vowed to take her unfair dismissal case ‘all the way to Luxembourg’ to the European Court of Justice.

Nohad Halawi allegedly weathered cruel rumours that she was ‘anti-Islamist,’ on top of a systematic catalogue of intimidation that included telling the 48-year-old that she would go to Hell if she did not convert to Islam.

Halawi, previously a beauty consultant for luxury cosmetics brand Shiseido, was then booted out of her 13-year-long job in Heathrow Airport’s World Duty Free shop, after going to her seniors with concerns about the verbal tirades she was subjected to.

She also claims ‘extremist’ colleagues brought the Koran to work to try and convert people to Islam and even handed out leaflets promoting terrorism, as well as declaring that it was ‘a shame’ the failed July 21 London bombings did not go off.

Having taken her tribunal case to the courts in 2011, Halawi lost after it was ruled that as a part time and commissioned-based freelance she was not a staff employee.

Today, however, she won the right to appeal.

Speaking outside court, the mum-of-two from Weybridge, Surrey, told how the abuse started after she stuck up for a Christian colleague who was left in tears after Muslim staff made fun of her for wearing a cross necklace.

She said: ‘At first, because I am from Lebanon, they assumed I was Muslim but when they found out I wasn’t they started bullying me.’

 Halawi, who came to Britain from Lebanon in 1977, continued: ‘They used to say about 9/11 that it serves the American’s right and that it was a shame the failed London bombings did not go off. When I asked them why they did not go back and live in their own country if they didn’t like the UK, they said ‘we came to the West to try and convert as many people to Islam as we can.’

She also revealed insider knowledge on life within Heathrow: ‘They keep coming to the airport and many of them work in security. It is terrible there. If they see that you are a Muslim they wave you through. One time they thought my husband was Muslim and said ‘don’t worry he is one of us’ and let him through without checking him. And you’re telling me this is safe security.’

Employment: One of the World Duty Free stores at Heathrow Airport, where Halawi worked for 13 yearsEmployment: One of the World Duty Free stores at Heathrow Airport, where Halawi worked for 13 years

Mrs Halawi said she once found extremist leaflets in one of her Muslim colleague’s drawers but the airport turned a blind eye. She said: “Management told him to throw them away. I later found out he had been sacked from other terminals for handing them out and inciting religious hatred, but duty free covered it up as they are scared of labelled Islamophobic.”

She was fired in July 2011 after five Muslim colleagues complained she was anti-Islamic followed a heated conversation in the store.

After her sacking 28 colleagues, some of them Muslims, signed a petition calling for her reinstatement claiming she was dismissed on the basis of “malicious lies”, but it was unsuccessful.

Having lost her first unfair dismissal campaign, Halawi received help from the Christian Legal Centre to further her case and has subsequently won a right to appeal.

She added: ‘I am not and have never been racist or anti religion. I have many Muslim friends. I am doing this because I want to show that people It’s not fair to use the religion card. They’ve ruined my life. They’ve ruined my family’s lives. I can’t get work and am relying on friends and family to get by’

A spokesperson for World Duty Free refused to comment because of the ‘ongoing legal proceedings.’
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2308268/Christian-airport-worker-wins-right-appeal-tribunal.html#ixzz2QYGkvFZk
Please consider sharing this post with your friends and  like our new Facebook page  to raise awarenes. Help in the struggle to stop the Islamic quest for World domination before its to late

Muslim woman plays the victim and starts legal proceedings against interrogation at airport

A Muslim woman who was stopped and questioned at the airport under anti terrorism law has started legal proceedings claiming that her human rights were violated. The Muslim woman was prosecuted after she refused to cooperate with the police and wouldn’t  answer their questions regarding the reasons for her visit to France. Now she is playing the victim in the whole thing like Muslims so often do despite pleading guilty to the charge of wilfully failing to comply with her duty under Schedule 7 to answer questions.  

Sylvie Beghal claims that being asked questions without a lawyer present under Schedule 7 violated the right to liberty (Article 5), right to a fair trial (Article 6) and Ms Beghal’s right to protection for her private and family life (Article 8). Under Schedule 7 anti terrorism laws a lawyer would not of been able to advise his client during questioning anyway and she had a legal duty to answer. Ultimately it was the woman’s stubbornness being awkward refusing to answer that resulted in her arrest .Now she is acting hard done to and putting  the whole schedule 7 laws at risk challenging the legality of an essential weapon in fighting terrorism.

If a person had nothing to hide then why would they object to a few questions if it helped keep our nation safe from terrorist attack. The only people who have anything to gain from those laws getting scrapped would be the Muslim terrorists who hate this country so much they want to slay as many innocent men, women and children as possible.

MUSLIMS TERROR RISK AT AIRPORT

Muslim woman in legal challenge to interrogation at airport

2:27pm Thursday 21st March 2013 in News

A Muslim woman is seeking a legal declaration that her human rights were violated when she was prosecuted after refusing to submit to an interrogation under anti-terrorism laws at an airport.

Mother-of-three Sylvie Beghal was stopped and questioned, even though she was not “suspected” of being a terrorist.

Police officers said they needed to speak to her regarding her “possible involvement” in acts of terrorism.

In what is believed to be the first legal challenge of its kind, Mrs Beghal’s lawyers argued this week at London’s High Court heard.that the entire process of stopping and questioning people “without reasonable suspicion” breaches the European Convention on Human Rights.

They said it was significant that Mrs Beghal had no right of access to a lawyer while being questioned and was being put under direct compulsion to provide information.

The court heard she indicated she would answer questions after the arrival of her lawyer, but the police chose not to wait.

When her lawyer arrived after her questioning had finished, the officers did not seek to ask her any more questions in the lawyer’s presence, three judges were told.

Mrs Beghal, a French national living in the UK, arrived back at East Midlands Airport with her children on January 4, 2011 following a visit to Paris but was not formally detained or arrested.

She was stopped at the UK Border Agency desk but refused to co-operate with questioning by Leicestershire police officers acting under powers given by schedule 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT).

Mrs Beghal asked to consult with a lawyer and for an opportunity to pray.

After being given time to pray, police officers told her she could telephone her lawyer after she was searched. The prosecution initially accused her of physically resisting the search.

At 9.30pm she was taken to a room for an examination under Schedule 7 and asked to provide reasons for her journey, where she stayed in Paris, whom she had met or visited and how her travel was funded.

She was also asked whether she had a criminal record and about her knowledge of the French-Algerian community in Leicestershire, her use of vehicles, the languages she spoke and her current and past employment.

She failed to provide answers to most of the questions, indicating she would only answer questions after her lawyer arrived.

She was subsequently charged with wilfully obstructing a search, assaulting a constable and wilfully failing to comply with her duty under Schedule 7 to answer questions.

The first two charges were eventually dismissed in December 2011 after the Crown Prosecution Service offered no evidence and Mrs Beghal pleaded guilty to the third charge.

She did so after District Judge Temperley, sitting at Leicester Magistrates’ Court, refused her request to stay the charge as an abuse of process, and the case was referred to the High Court.

Ms Beghal’s counsel Matthew Ryder asked three senior judges – Lord Justice Gross, Mrs Justice Swift and Mr Justice Foskett – to rule Schedule 7 “incompatible” with the human rights convention.

Mr Ryder argued Schedule 7 violated the right to liberty (Article 5), right to a fair trial (Article 6) and Ms Beghal’s right to protection for her private and family life (Article 8).

Mr Ryder also argued the prosecution was an unjustifiable interference with Ms Beghal’s “right to free movement” within an EU country as an EU national.

Louis Malby, appearing for the Crown Prosecution Service, told the judges that Schedule 7 empowered officers to question a person entering or leaving the country if they “appear to be a person who is, or has been, concerned in the commission, preparation or instigation of acts of terrorism”.

Any person being questioned was under a legal duty to give the officer any information in his or her possession that was requested.

Arguing that Mrs Beghal’s rights had not been breached, Mr Malby said: “The ability to stop and examine passengers at ports is an essential tool in the protection of the public from terrorism.”

Mr Malby said Mrs Beghal was given an opportunity to consult with a solicitor in advance of questioning, and it was agreed that a telephone consultation took place.

But a solicitor would have had no purpose at the actual questioning, other than as an observer to ensure proper procedure, as Mrs Beghal was under a legal obligation to answer the questions put to her.

Reserving judgment, the judges said they would give their ruling at a future date.

Opening peoples eyes to the threat that Political Islam poses to all our futures. Counter Jihad, Opposing the Islamization And Stealth Jihad of our infidel lands, Anti Rape-Jihad, Exposing Muslim Grooming Gangs, Reverse Dawah, Highlighting Pro Muslim Media Bias And Reverse Racism, Campaigning Against New Mosque Building, Against Inhumane Halal Slaughtered Food. Hater Of All Terrorism And Violence

%d bloggers like this: