Muslim needs facial surgery after horse he tried having sex with kicks his head in.

When it comes to sex it seems Muslim men seem to live by the saying of any port in a storm and have no boundarys where they get it regardless of whether its morally or legally right.To their warped minds anything is fair game, consensual or by force, of legal age or under age, dead or alive,human or animal. As the earlier  post about Muslims and animal sex showed the Muslim world are quite partial to a bit of bestiality.

 So I couldnt help but have a little chuckle to myself when i read this Spanish story. Turns out a North African muslim immigrant in Almeria, Spain was feeling a bit frisky thought he would rape a horse. Having already been disturbed twice before by the farmer he must of hoped it was 3rd time lucky.

Just a shame the horse had other ideas than let some perverted muslim rape her. Kicking the sicko so hard in the face that he needed reconstructive surgery haha. As if the incident itself and being arrested wasnt bad enough for him. He now faces deportation. What a shame!!!!

A mare smashes him the face of a Moor in Almeria when he tried to rape her


Torre Cardenas hospital image center of the capital, where the Maghreb remains degenerate input.

A North African had to undergo emergency Torrecárdenas hospital after a horse to give him a kick in the face and the destrozase while trying to abuse her sexually. According to Diario de Almeria account, the events occurred in a private estate in the municipality of El Ejido.

Apparently not the first time the individual was served in the farm to be with animals, mainly mares. In fact, the owner of it surprised him twice, but not known to have filed a complaint.

Health officials confirmed that the wounded man entered the same day of the incident through the Emergency Unit and immediately underwent surgery in which surgeons had to reconstruct his face. He was part of the facial bones and multiple bruises parties. The blow caused her to haemorrhage ceased after it was treated at the hospital.

After discharge, a week ago, the individual left the Torrecárdenas Hospital and the Civil Guard has identified and located as it is in an irregular situation in the country. On completion of the arrest, the immigrant could be deported to their country for an offense against the Immigration Act.

via A mare smashes him the face of a Moor in Almeria when he tried to rape her | Digital Alert.

30 thoughts on “Muslim needs facial surgery after horse he tried having sex with kicks his head in.”

  1. It is sick who ever had done it! but to suggest all muslim men are into beastality is a very unfair generalisation!

    also, notice the title refers to his religion rather than his race! because the writer knows he would not have got away with the latter.

    1. Why would i refer to the mans race?? This site has nothing to do with the colour of anyones skin.doing so would be racist which isnt how we play here This is a counter jihad site meaning we oppose political islam and highlight the evil within it and the threat to our futures that Islam is. Not every asian or black person is Muslim just like a white person could convert. Islam is a belief not a race.The colour of peoples skin is totally irrelevant thats why the mans race wasnt mentioned .
      Sex with animals is permitted in Islam. Thats why there is rules for having sex with animals.In depth guidelines for sex with animals can be found in the writings of Ayatollah Khomeini.

      1. As a human being, with brain and all, do you judge a person depending on his ethnicity, religion, and color? Do you think it’s fair to do so? I bet you don’t.
        I’m not talking about the article… I’m being totally objective here. It may be true or it may be not. You can’t say all Jews are bad people, or Christians or Muslims. It depends on the individual knowledge of what’s right and what’s wrong. I will tell you something, but I hope you don’t cyber bully me about it. I’m a Muslim. And I’m completely ashamed of horrible people like that. A thing you need to know, when you mention a Muslim did that or this. You should specify what kind of Muslim. There is Shia and Sunna. Shia is the definition of abomination in human race. They are evil and psychotic. They make up rules and beliefs to serve their own greed and all what’s vile and shameful. We Sunna don’t even count them as Muslims as they crossed the border of religion. I get completely sick in my stomach at their wrongful deeds. Most of Shia is Iranians, I don’t need to say more on them, you probably know. I can see this is a hate-on-Muslims blog, but I would appreciate it if you were more specific. Keep up the good work.

      2. Why would i cyber bully you just for being Muslim? You wont find any of my comments that im cyber bullying anyone. i despise bullys if you must know. Your comment was said in a civillized manner and politely i have no reason for giving you grief.If i wanted to bully anyone theres more deserving cases like the comments that get deleted from some Muslims like “im gonna rape your mother” etc etc. Rather than give a constructive criticism in an adult way and engage in a civilised debate which is something which i would actually encourage. Even though we may have different opinions and agree to disagree afterwards.Your comments will be taken on board and thought about and i will respect you for the fact you have taken the time to discuss the subjects in a grown up way.Without dialogue mine yours and 99.9% other peoples opinions will never change.
        Your comments “I’m completely ashamed of horrible people like that” tells me your not a bad person. But from my experience Muslims like you who say something like that criticizing another Muslim are very few and far between which is half of the problem of where were at today.They would rather bury their heads in the sand and say nothing or make up some kind of excuse for their fellow Muslims actions.Even in regards to despicable acts like the recent Muslim paedophile gangs exploiting white school girls we have had in the UK. Pretending that it isnt a problem defies logic.

    2. Khomeini On Sodomy And Bestiality

      Muhammad: For a Muslim father there can be no greater satisfaction than giving your daughter to a deserving older man or cleric. As the Ayatollah Khomeini wrote in the Tahrirolvasyleh, his monumental collection of commentaries on Islamic jurisprudence and morality, “It is better for a girl to marry in such a time when she would begin menstruation at her husband’s house rather than her father’s home. Any father marrying his daughter so young will have a permanent place in heaven.”

      Johnny: The Ayatollah Khomeini, now, there is one holy man with whom I am quite familiar.

      Muhammad: We are all very familiar with the great and revered teacher, the Grand Ayatollah Khomeini.

      Johnny: This may be a bit off topic, actually just about this entire conversation has been off topic, but since you quoted the late, “great” Ayatollah Khomeini on the subject of how old a girl should be before she is given away in marriage; what do you think of Khomeini’s views on bestiality and the sodomizing of baby girls?

      Muhammad: What do you mean? The Ayatollah Khomeini said many things. He is a hero. The Islamic Republic is a tribute to his courage, his determination and clear Islamic thinking. What he did in Iran served as a model for us when the opportunity presented itself for Muslims across Canada to create their own Islamic republic in miniature, the Islamic municipalities. God could not have chosen a better example to follow. He could not have chosen a better mouthpiece.

      Johnny: Yes, but out of that mouth came such statements … statements that struck many people as strange, even by Islamic standards. Take for example his views on sodomizing baby girls. I remember his instructions by heart, there were so, so … disgust … disturbing. What I remember him saying was: “A man can have sexual pleasure from a child as young as a baby. However he should not penetrate, sodomising the child is OK. If the man penetrates and damages the child then he should be responsible for her subsistence all her life. This girl however does not count as one of his four permanent wives. The man will not be eligible to marry the girl’s sister.”

      Muhammad: Your point would be?

      Johnny: He even had views on sex with animals. For example his advice on sex with chickens.

      Muhammad: Khomeini was nothing if not thorough. You are taking what he wrote out of context. The Tahrirolvasyleh, better known as The Political, Philosophical, Social and Religious Principles of Ayatollah Khomeini, was a monumental achievement, a clear and precise guide for his disciples. They would have understood what the master meant. It was not intended for un-informed unbelievers looking to discredit the faith and one of its revered teachers

      Johnny: Well, what did he mean?

      Muhammad: Khomeini was well aware of the voraciousness of a man’s sexual appetite. In fact, the Koran and the Prophet’s, the peace and blessings of God be upon him, instructions for the seclusion of women, the so-called Islamic prison that some writers, mostly dead writers, have claimed Islam is for Muslim women, was for their own protection. These so-called prisons are to protect them from this manly weakness which they are bound to provoke in men other than their husband.

      Johnny: What does that have to do with sodomizing baby girls and copulating with chickens?

      Muhammad: A good Muslim man can only have sexual relations with his wives, the women to whom he is legally married. What if a wife is not around when an overwhelming urge to copulate comes over him but a female child is? Allah, The Loving does not condone the sodomizing of a child, nor does the Ayatollah Khomeini – even under the most intense sexual duress. The revered Ayatollah’s views on the sodomizing of baby girls is meant as a warning to the would-be sodomizer that Allah, The Finder, will expect him to look after the welfare of that child if he damages her in anyway. This is a very strong incentive against such an act.

      Johnny: How about a cold shower or getting re-acquainted with your right-hand as a means of relieving the sexual tension and sparing the baby girl?

      Muhammad: Idiot. Water in the deserts of Arabia, the ancestral home of Islam, was a precious commodity not to be wasted on relieving sexual tension. As for your crude reference to masturbation, the Messenger of God is unequivocal on the subject, “he who masturbates is cursed.” Better to sodomize a baby and pay the price if damage ensues than to be cursed by Allah, The All Seeing, and spend an eternity in hell.

      Johnny: Since you put it that way. What about his view on bestiality, specifically sex with chickens as explained by Azar Nafisi in her memoir Reading Lolita in Teheran?

      Muhammad: Women are simply not capable of understanding the logic behind the instructions of a great and learned man like the Ayatollah Khomeini. Even the learned and well-read Ayatollah Khomeini could not foresee what questions his disciples would ask. Quite a few would have come to hear the Master from remote farms and villages, and he did not want God’s mouthpiece to be perceived as ignorant in the ways of peasants and young boys. Peasant boys coming of age when the only relief of sexual tensions would have been a domesticated animal such as a lamb, a calf … yes even a chicken – though the mechanics of such a union escape me – but the mechanics of such a union would not have escaped a great Islamic scholar like the Ayatollah Khomeini whose attention to the smallest of details when it came to matters of the flesh … of the Faith, is well-known.

      Johnny: Sex with chickens; that is mind-boggling, not to say gross.

      Muhammad: [showing signs of frustration] Does anyone really care about whether a chicken or any other barnyard animal is used to satisfy a man’s sexual urge? Better than sodomizing a child! The Political, Philosophical, Social and Religious Principles of Ayatollah Khomeini is not a guide to sex with barnyard animals, but a guide to what you do with that animal afterwards. The Ayatollah Khomeini believed that in some circumstances by having sex with an animal you had rendered that animal impure for consumption. The sex with chickens reference was just the Ayatollah imagining a question from a student about whether a chicken could be eaten after penetration; whether it had become impure in the eyes of Allah, the Provider and whether eating it would offend Him.

      Johnny: So what can you do with a chicken after you have sex with it?

      Muhammad: According to our cultured and learned Ayatollah Khomeini, neither the man who has copulated with the chicken nor his immediate family or his next-door neighbours can eat of that chicken’s meat but it is acceptable for a neighbour who lives two doors away.

      Johnny: Interesting.

      Muhammad: The learned Ayatollah Khomeini did not come by his knowledge and scholarship by ignoring the more intimate details of human existence. He pondered these relationships – man-child, man-animal relationships – which lesser minds in the decadent West ignored, so as to ensure that even these relationships did not deviate from any behaviour that was acceptable to Allah, Lord of the Universe. He was an example for us all who are interested in living our lives as Allah, The Watchful intended in the smallest detail.

      Johnny: An example indeed!

      Muhammad: Anyway, what has all this got to do with The Fracture?

      Johnny: Not much, except perhaps Muslim’s attitude towards sex and women in particular exacerbated the tensions between followers of the Prophet and followers of other would-be-saviours.

      Muhammad: There is only one saviour; He is Allah, The Forgiving. Those who don’t believe and fear him “shall burn for ever in the fire of Hell. They are the vilest of all creatures” so said, Allah, The Merciful.

  2. Kafircrusader the anti racist but anti islam policy is the same as my place. I take the view that racism is the height of stupidity but being anti Islam is the height of common sense.

    On the subject of the story, it looks like the horse has more sense than the average diversity officer, or police officer or social worker or councillor or …(insert selected dhimmi groups here)

  3. Goes to show just how stupid and illiterate most Islamist are, I guess he misunderstood the concept of riding a horse. I guess no one told him you ride from the back and not the back! LOL

  4. Good one, pity the horse didn’t break the bastards neck with the kick, save everyone a lot of hassle.

    As for comments from Alia, I was brought up in Wolverhampton many years ago and I had many friends from Indian and Pakistani families. The problem seems to be the new wave of immigrant, it seems that certain governments are sending hardline jihadis and criminal factions to Europe and the States in an effort to undermine our cultures. This I know is affecting not only the indigenious population, but also the immigrant population that arrived here years ago and have to a large extent integrated into the general population. These new people do not want to integrate, they are here to pave the way for domination and that will include everyone that does not comply with sharia. Best thing you can do is start preaching to like minded muslims as yourself, at least that way the authorities may take note and stop persecuting the rest of us for trying to stop the rot.

  5. Well you’ve got to remember most Muslim men are used to having sex with young boys or else goats or sheep. I would bet that typically lacking in formal education as well as common sense he probably fell in lust before he was able to figure out how to compensate for the difference in size.

  6. How much medically disposable income does Spain have to treat this kind of super traumatic injury? The, uh, horses lover can’t possibly have that much cabbage either. Please don’t bring him here to Boston for treatment. I know that the hospitals here make names for themselves by taking on difficult cases and patients making a successful recovery and all but, no. You try to have sex with a horse and if the worst thing that happens to you is that you get smashed in the face, count your blessings sir. Once he gets deported back to North Africa, will he be prosecuted or hailed as some sort of Muslim hero? What if he needed and received a blood transfusion, a big no-no for Islamic followers. Hope he gets stoned to death.

  7. Muslim men have in the past and are currently raping infants as young as three months. If you want to contemplate ‘size’, remember the little babies that need to be surgically sewn back together. Abhorrent and disgraceful behavior among Muslim men.

  8. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH ! Can’t stop laughing ; So this proves that , THAT ill born Muslim , lunatic , pigson of deffinite whore , rapist of any 4 legged ones ( hence died of venereal disease ) womaniser Mohammad was the first PEDOPHILE , to have sex with the 4 legged ones ( Preached his followers too to do the same ) ! Non – stop laugh ! hahahahahahah……………..!




      by Kirsten Andersen
      • Thu Sep 12, 2013
      CANTERBURY, UK, September 12, 2013 ( – When Richard Dawkins was 11 years old, his art teacher pulled him onto his lap, reached into his shorts, and fondled his genitals. When he told his schoolmates, he learned he wasn’t alone – the man had abused some of his friends, too. But 60 years later, the famed atheist author of The God Delusion can’t bring himself to condemn the teacher’s actions.
      Dawkins told The Times magazine last week that abuse like he and his classmates suffered causes “no lasting harm,” and that “mild pedophilia” or “touching up” shouldn’t be judged as harshly as rape or other crimes.
      “I am very conscious that you can’t condemn people of an earlier era by the standards of ours,” Dawkins said. “Just as we don’t look back at the 18th and 19th centuries and condemn people for racism in the same way as we would condemn a modern person for racism, I look back a few decades to my childhood and see things like caning, like mild pedophilia, and can’t find it in me to condemn it by the same standards as I or anyone would today.”
      Victims’ rights groups reacted with outrage to Dawkins’ comments. Peter Watt, director of child protection at the National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children, said Dawkins’ remarks were “a terrible slight” to victims of childhood sexual abuse.
      “Mr. Dawkins seems to think that because a crime was committed a long time ago we should judge it in a different way,” Watt said. “But we know that the victims of sexual abuse suffer the same effects, whether it was 50 years ago or yesterday.”
      Peter Saunders, founder of the National Association for People Abused in Childhood and himself a victim of abuse, said, “Abuse in all its forms has always been wrong. Evil is evil and we have to challenge it whenever and wherever it occurs.”
      But Dawkins doubled down on his remarks via social media Tuesday, taking to Twitter to argue that “’Mild touching up’ is bad. Raping 8-year-old wife to death is worse…Quantitative judgment vs. black/white.”
      When users reacted with anger to the statement, he pressed on, writing, “Is anyone seriously denying that raping an 8-year-old to death is worse than putting a hand inside a child’s clothes? Are you that ABSOLUTE?”
      “Non-consensual sex is always bad. But raping an 8-year-old to death is quantitatively worse than ‘touching inappropriately,’” he added. “Shades of grey.”
      This is not the first time Dawkins has said something controversial about pedophilia. In his book The God Delusion, he argued that raising children in the Catholic faith is more abusive than sexual molestation.
      Regarding the priestly abuse scandals then rocking the Church in Ireland, Dawkins wrote, “Horrible as sexual abuse no doubt was, the damage was arguably less than the long-term psychological damage inflicted by bringing the child up Catholic in the first place.”
      Last year, he stood by that statement in an interview on Al Jazeera, telling interviewer Mehdi Hasan about a friend of his who was sexually abused by a priest at the age of seven, but as an adult, remembered being taught about the existence of Hell as having been much more traumatic.
      “She told me of those two abuses, she got over the physical abuse; it was yucky but she got over it,” Dawkins said. “But the mental abuse of being told about Hell, she took years to get over.”
      During the author’s Twitter battle Tuesday, one user, @pelirrojo79, referenced the exchange, writing, “Weird. Richard Dawkins says religion is child abuse. Actual child abuse, not that bad. He got touched as a kid and he’s doing fine.”

  9. If this had happened in Syria the horse would have been brutally murdered for being raped! I hope the Spanish government throws the book at the sicko rapist. I say cut his cajones off and let him bleed out so he doesn’t get deported and rape any more females!

  10. Yes, this is a sad commentary, again, on the issue of rape, which rears it’s ugly head and doesn’t go away. And why would a normal self-respecting man who cares about his dignity and health want to insert a body part into an animal? I’m sorry, I don’t get it. Not on any level. Sexual intercourse is for procreation; our culture has made it acceptable as a form of pleasure, hopefully between consenting adults, yest so many people–and yes it’s mostly MEN–persist in using the sexual organ as to unish, to release anger, to show power, or just to…??? Huh? Help me out here? What is it? Have they no dignity, self awareness, self control. Age old questions for an age old enigama. The heartbreak of humanity. The crime that is the anit-Christ.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s